Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Ed Lyons

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Ed Lyons got a reaction from Aurea Ratio in Larger page thumbnails in Publisher   
    Currently there is small, medium, and large, but humongous would be nice, about twice the size of large. I would then be able to make the Pages window almost fill the screen and move pages around my textbook by being able to read the titles.
  2. Like
    Ed Lyons got a reaction from Bartosz Borecki in Pinned documents automatically unpinned when opened   
    I keep losing my pinned files also. It happens across all three Windows 11 apps.
  3. Like
    Ed Lyons got a reaction from walt.farrell in Publisher page navigation gets out of sync   
    Thank you for the tip! I had not seen that before, but mine was already checked.
    I tested it several ways and scrolling happened properly...AFTER I restarted the app. I should have thought of that possibility before...
    My best explanation is that after a while, (perhaps putting the computer to sleep for the night?) Affinity apps act sluggish like their memory is fragged. That is just my guess, because Task Manager shows memory and drive usage is low and availability is high. I restart and things get better, the sun shines, the birds sing,...!!!
  4. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to R C-R in Why can't I add these shapes together?   
    It does to me but I may not understand why the shapes not being fully aligned would have any effect on this. I do not think it is the same for V1 is it?
  5. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to 4dimage in Why can't I add these shapes together?   
    I guess this is related to some other v2 bugs concerning pathes that where created from Text (artistic text -> convert to curves). These shapes lead to weird results in boolean operations, montage group and with the new shape builder tool.
    I guess Serif is aware of this bug.
     Read e.g. this and other posts:
     
    If i take your shapes and try this in Designer v1 (select all -> boolean merge) it works as expected without any problems:



     
     
  6. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to firstdefence in Why can't I add these shapes together?   
    The issue is where the 'Y' and the 'T' intersect and the same on the other side with the 'B', altering this allows the letters to join as expected. Also the letters aren't quite aligned correctly but using the alignment tools gets around that small issue.
    Not aligned correctly.

    How to fix the issue, Firstly I flipped the stroke to a fill, you can flip the colour back to a stroke later.
    Use the alignment tools.

    Slide the nodes to a different position

    You should end up with something like this

    Remember you have to do the same thing with the Y and the B on the other side but you should now be able to Geometry Add all the letters
     
     
  7. Like
    Ed Lyons got a reaction from PixelEngineer in Bizarre results for superscript   
    Oh wow! I have never seen that option before! That helps and it clarifies!!
    Thank you!
  8. Like
    Ed Lyons got a reaction from angelhdz12 in Preferences window UI is frustratingly designed   
    I agree with Nikola and Aammppaa. Preferences is mostly an intellectual mess and takes too many clicks to find the right category. And there are not even that many settings right now. Imagine what will happen as they grow with future versions! Put a simple list of categories on the left that shows the options on the right. One click!
  9. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to AndyQ in Preferences window UI is frustratingly designed   
    One quick fix for efficiency is simply to make a list of categories in a panel at the left which bring up the options for that category on the right, so you can click through them super fast rather than having to go forward and back. "Aammppaa" mentioned Reaper and Blender (2.8 presumably) as examples, and both of these applications (as with Adobe apps) use this type of system. A lot of "preference" options are things I'm changing frequently so faster access would be very helpful.
  10. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to angelhdz12 in Preferences window UI is frustratingly designed   
    Totally agree. Preferences window is a mess.
  11. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to Aammppaa in Preferences window UI is frustratingly designed   
    REAPER is an excellent example.
    As is XYplorer file manager, which has a searchable list of 100s if not 1000s of actions.
    I've said it elsewhere, but it bears repeating, we must be able to search both for actions, and existing keypresses.
    And, be able to jump instantly to the opposite half of any conflicting shortcut, so that it can be resolved.
  12. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to Nikola Kovac in Preferences window UI is frustratingly designed   
    Version 1.7 still has just as hideous Preferences window as before. Such a shame, all those nice new features' shortcuts hidden under a black magic wall that the "Keyboard Shortcuts" window is. Using it hurts like my fingers are broken. For a graphical design app this is embarrassing. Take a look at Reaper digital audio workstation app for instance how "search" should work. The program might be ugly but it works and is 100 times more intuitive and quicker to set up.
    Excuse my strong language, but for someone working in several 3D, game engine, audio, graphical and painting apps daily switching them back and forth (think 5-6 daily) setting up shortcuts easily is absolutely important. Being able to set up most of shortcuts the same in all graphics apps quickly for me is the first base and Affinity leaves bitter taste at the very start.
    People do not think of features of an app in terms of categories but as tools or features. Affinity pleases don't make us search for them via two mutually dependant dropdowns like it is 1990. It is 2019 for god's sake, filter the list while I'm typing into search bar at least. or as in Blender 3d allow me to set a new shortcut immediately in the program with right-click on the button on the main UI.
    Please, please, please!
  13. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to Aammppaa in Preferences window UI is frustratingly designed   
    Yes… <reads more paragraphs> Yes <reads more> Still yes <more> OMG yes! <reads to the end> Yup, agree with everything you wrote.
    I asked for an upgrade to the search function back in 2016, still got my fingers crossed.
    But as you say, the whole Preferences dialogue needs an overhaul.
  14. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to Nikola Kovac in Preferences window UI is frustratingly designed   
    ...continued
    "Reset" what? does it reset the shortcuts in focus or all? the manual says all customized, but a first time user, trying to find its way around the app will have to dig, and all it takes is that button to say "Reset all shortcuts to factory defaults" (or something on that line)
    "Clear all shortcuts" ok this one is self explanatory.
    7. the shortcut list itself...
    a) c'mon, it's a list and it is restricted to show only 8 lines at a time it is wider than it is tall, and the window cannot be resized to see all items on the list :-D that's silly. I need to constantly scroll up and down this miniature list although I could dedicate a whole monitor for it, as I am unable to search for an item on it because the frickin' search bar is bonkers.
    b) If I pick a new key that overlaps with existing combo, I get great little yellow icon telling me so, mouseover will give me the info, great. And now I need to go back to those two fiddly drop-downs fo find my way to the duplicate if I want to change it, why not give me an opportunity to solve this conflict here and now, by doublee clicking on the yellow icon or something.
    Here is my suggestion for solving the Keyboard Shortcut preferences mess. Why not making a table with horizontally foldable categories of shortcuts (foldable like "Assets" sub categories) these categories would be "File", "Edit", "Text" etc.. First column would stay the same, that is, the description, Second column would show Draw persona shortcuts, third Pixel persona, fourth Export persona. It would make the features that are parallel across personas obvious, those that are non-existent in a certain persona would be "grayed out"  And make the preferences window resizable, please. That way we could edit our shortcuts many times more quickly, and enjoy the switch to Affinity apps much more.
    Please, pardon my ignorance, as I am not a professional UI designer but a frustrated user. I have written this overly long post to try and make Affinity better. I have lost precious time and artistic inspiration because of the design of this window and decided to spend some more time, trying my best to alleviate the problem somehow.
    Please try and read it with an open heart, as it was written in the best of intention.
     
  15. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to Nikola Kovac in Preferences window UI is frustratingly designed   
    There it goes, my inspiration that is, out of the window, and I lost it trying to change who knows what shortcut key... again.
    As a professional in video, animation, 3d and audio I have used many many applications over the years, and find Affinity package a real refreshing leap forward. However, I must admit that the preferences window across all three Affinity apps (Photo, Designer and Publisher) is one of the most useless I have ever encountered. I am not afraid to switch and learn applications and am ready to customize the new ones I learn to my own best practices, and the preferences window is my friend or it should be, but Affinity's is not at all. Please let me try to explain what I find is wrong with and suggest some changes which I did not think a lot about, but seem much simpler to use. Let's start:
    1. The preferences window uses a unique visual paradigm, completely different from any other dialogue I have encountered in the rest of the application. It has a header with Back/forward buttons, "home" button (with an odd icon and a drop-down menu) and search bar. No other panel, toolbar, manager, assistant or any other window in Affinity uses this paradigm or at least my humble knowledge of the app does not bring any into the mind. I doubt that this is good. For instance having tabs, like some other windows would do the trick no need for back/forward buttons, no need for home button, no need for drop-down menu, just 7 simple instantly accessable tabs.
    2. search bar is a sneaky red herring! It is in fact dangerously useless! I'd like to change a shortcut for brush size in pixel persona? typing any of these terms does not help me to find where to do it. It seems that this search bar is good for searching only a couple of dozen words which does not make any sense at all, either you make every single preference item that can be change searchable or get rid of the search bar because the way it is now is frustratingly useless.
    3. I will not go in depth on my thoughts about "General", "Color", "Performance", "User Interface" and "Tools" pages as I do see some benefit of "bite sized" preferences pages even if some items on them seem to belong to another page, and the number of these pages could actually be decreased. (for instance half of the "Tools" preferences could easily belong to "User Interface" tab)
    4. Checkboxes, since they have really powerful results would benefit from tooltip help with a more verbose description of what they do.
    5. "Miscellaneous" could easily be renamed to "factory resets" or something on that line, as that is what it does.
    6. And now I come to my nemesis, the "Keyboard Shortcuts" page. Where to start?!
    a) there is a search bar on the upper right, that is as we said a sneaky trap, and a red herring. It does not help us here, and will take us "home" probably finding nothing of interest.
    b) we need to use these two fiddly drop-downs. The first one could easily be replaced with beautiful Draw, Pixel and Export icons cutting the number of actions for picking persona to edit to only one click (or even better none.. read on). The second one is really unintuitive as its items partially overlap in different personas. It took me a while to get the idea that this second one is contextual to the first one (as the list changes "behind the curtain")... I got it only after learning my way a bit around the app so I recognised that some items belong to some personas.
    c)  a quick overview of other buttons and check boxes in this upper region of Keyboard Shortcuts page;
    "Apply to all" -what? to all what? I had to dig through the manual to see what it does, and all it would take to fix it is to call it "apply shortcut changes to all personas" without this information there is no way to know that there actually are some connections possible between personas. As if the for instance, brush size in pixel and draw persona must be separate.
    "Ignore Modifier—Lets you create shortcuts using a single letter designation instead of using keyboard modifiers." says the manual, and I still do not get it. Does it allow me to pres only the letter in application without modifier keys and get what I want? No, as Ctrl+S is stil "save" and "Ctrl+Shift+S" is stil Save as. Does it filter out the input of Modifier keys while assigning new shortcuts? No. So what does it do? Maybe a better explanation in manual would help, and a more verbose checkbox title or tooltip.
    "Load/Save" what? it loads and saves what? a file obviously, but what does that file contain? All shortcuts, or only those in focus? Maybe "Load Shortcut configuration" or something on that line would be better. to be continued...
  16. Sad
    Ed Lyons reacted to MEB in Open PagePlus (*.ppp) files   
    Hi MJWHM,
    Welcome to Affinity Forums
    As you probably have read by now the Affinity suite is being developed from scratch - it is not intended to be an upgrade or direct replacement to the Serif Plus line. This was done because Serif's Plus software codebase was starting showing its age and imposing limitations on its expansion. Affinity apps were developed with cross-platform in mind from beginning, a common file format that can be opened in any of the suite apps and to take advantage of the latest technology/API available on modern hardware/OSs. Since there's no feature parity between the old and new suite some of its features don't have yet an equivalent function/match in the new Affinity line or were implemented in a different way so even if there was an importer a few things would be lost anyway. Exporting the documents from the Plus line as PDF (SVG, PSD where applicable etc) isn't certainly an ideal solution as it also leads to some loss but the difference from a dedicated importer isn't probably that big to justify the time spent developing it. So what we advise is to keep using the old line for projects you have started there (it still works as usual as long as the OS supports it) and slowly transition new work to the new Affinity suite whenever possible. Hope you understand.
  17. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to OGMedia in Open PagePlus (*.ppp) files   
    I have years worth of publications, forms, etc. that I have created in Page Plus, would love to be able to open these and not have to start over.
     
  18. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to ChrisatBRIL in Open PagePlus (*.ppp) files   
    Yes, agreed very much. Those of us who have been very loyal Serrif users (for decades!) should not be forgotten. I am really surprised that you did not think of this right from the start, especially given the similarity of design and layour of your new Publisher. It means those of us with legacy documents that might be very important will have to maintain PagePlus and the new Publisher. So please don't just put this on the backburner, but get on and implement it.
  19. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to bbroth in Open PagePlus (*.ppp) files   
    Yes. I would also welcome this feature as I have many ppp files that I often reuse.
  20. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to vicsetter in Open PagePlus (*.ppp) files   
    Another request here, especially as Affinity Publisher (Beta) is stuck at 'Not Responding' trying to open my PagePlus created PDF!!
  21. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to Taiko-Karl in Open PagePlus (*.ppp) files   
    We also want to use our old PPP files (PagePlus X7) in the new AFP. We have put a lot of work in it and spend hours to create the publications.
     
  22. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to Allan PW in Open PagePlus (*.ppp) files   
    Please, please, pretty please! The structure, from what I've seen, is very like Pageplus and I've got years of stuff in that. Recreating a lot of text and document formats all over again would be a major pain. In practice, I wouldn't purchase until I had to unless this was on offer.
  23. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to Sam Neil in Open PagePlus (*.ppp) files   
    I too love to see this feature (even as a plugin)
  24. Like
    Ed Lyons reacted to BtB in Open PagePlus (*.ppp) files   
    Hi,
    Got a library of hundred of these (version X6) that regularly get updated. Will they be supported? Haven't spotted any reference to this in anything I've read. Hope I've just missed it.
    Thanks
    Richard
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.