Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Venyer

Members
  • Posts

    90
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Venyer

  1. 2 hours ago, Roqoco said:

    Just a random thought - I know that Windows pro has some quirks, for instance they recently released a restrictive safety extension that some users found hard to completely eliminate... Anyway, it seems to me that given the experiences of others with the windows version your problem is most likely due to some incompatibity or glitch with something in your specific configuration. Not easy to tie down what that might be.

    Thank you @Roqoco: That could be one of the reasons but I don't understand how that could be happening since the last beta is supposed to be exactly the same as the 'stable' version. It happens since the 1.9 release.

  2. 22 minutes ago, Paul Mudditt said:

    Your results are much better than my PC version Intel I5-7400 32GB + GTX 1650. But my PC works well. Also here is my M1 for comparison and why I prefer that.

    The M1 seems to be a great machine. My computer is good enough to run AP and I was really happy when I tried the beta because it really improved its performance and some other bugs but my surprise was when I installed the 'stable' and the performance was really really low... Unusable.

    11 minutes ago, firstdefence said:

    Clutching at straws here but do you Antivirus (AV) running? could you add Affinity to a whitelist and/or an exclusion list or temporarily disable the AV to test. If you close any an all non-essential apps does that make a difference, if it does there may be a conflict between apps that are running. 

    I have it disabled and I have tried running the program with almost no proccesses running in the background with the same results.

  3. 19 minutes ago, Patrick Connor said:

    That is surprising as they are the same codebase, so not sure how that could be the case if all other things are equal (same document, same layout of the panels etc). What does "Preferences > Performance > Hardware Acceleration" say for you in each version?

    Yes, it is. Tested using the same files and settings. The same happened with the last stable (1.9) version and the beta.

    In the 1.9.1.979 the performance preferences are the same.

    191_979_beta_performance_settings.JPG

    191_979_stable_performance_settings.JPG

  4. 9 hours ago, Roqoco said:

    Is also working on my nvidia 1080 late jan driver. Also 1.9.1 appears faster and more stable (failure to save and other problems appear to be fixed). Might be worth posting your specs.

    I am using Win10pro on a xeon e31240v2, 32gb of ram, ssd and a Nvidia 1660ti with the latest drivers.

    I am glad to hear that the program runs well for you. The 1.9 branch has so many problems that it is really hard to make any serious work with it.

    For now, I am using the beta version which runs much faster.

  5. Hi @walt.farrell: yes, I have tried almost every option with no luck. It looks that nvidia acceleration doesn't work in the stable version while it is working perfectly in the beta version.

    I had reported this weird behaviour several times. It looks that there is something in the stable compilation that is not on the beta. I am really dissapointed.

    I have been recomending the programs to lots of people since I bought them years ago... but no more. I get all kind of bad comments from people who tried to change their workflow from Adobe to Affinity following my advice recently and that it is a real pity.

  6. I have been experiencing problems since last summer. This is getting so frustrating that I have decided that I won't recommend this program anymore.

    I have the three programs besides the three workbooks. I am really dissapointed. I have been beta testing for months and it seems the problems are unsolvable. The beta version works better than the stable version.

     

  7. 9 minutes ago, walt.farrell said:

    It runs in the background, using CPU and GPU cycles to solve various problems involving protein folding to help fight diseases (such as COVID-19). It can be configured to pause when the system is busy, or to use as much resource as it can get all the time. Either would interfere, to varying amounts, with a benchmark.

    Ok. Thank you @walt.farrell

  8. I believe beta testing is there fo a reason. There is no point releasing a 'stable' version with so many problems.

    Average users backup their documents just in case. I think that should be enough.

    It is a pity that you can't have a robust and stable system with Windows and other program updates... You have to keep your fingers crossed hoping that everything goes well.

  9. I have been trying 1.9 betas and the performance was superior to the 1.8.5. I updated AP to 1.9 stable and it is SO slow that it is unusable. Hardware acceleration doesn't work and even in warp mode it is slow as hell. I can't understand how it is possible that the betas worked better than the stable release.

    It's been lots of problems since last summer, panoramas that don't work, stacks, hdrs, nvidia drivers, C1 interferring... and now AP 1.9 Stable really slow. I have read lots of comments relating the same thing in the forum.

    Is Affinity going to release a fix or something soon? This is so frustrating. I can't imagine proffesionals relying on this software.

    Where can I download the betas of the 1.9 version?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.