Gabe

Can we please keep this thread for discussions about the Delete node feature? 

Can we please keep this thread for discussions about the Delete node feature? 

There was no intention of calling anyone stupid. I was strictly speaking for this scenario (our apps not working on OCLP). We know our apps work on supported platforms, and was just saying we cannot help/look into why the app doesn't work. Sorry, I should have phrased that better.
Absolutely. If you get it running, we have nothing against you using it, or anything against you reporting bugs.

Thanks. Issue logged. 

The original report was about this ^, so we reverted it to the v1 behaviour. 
I agree, the modal dialog you get when you open a PDF would be a better solution, but that would be an improvement request/new feature rather than a bug. 

The original report was about this ^, so we reverted it to the v1 behaviour. 
I agree, the modal dialog you get when you open a PDF would be a better solution, but that would be an improvement request/new feature rather than a bug. 

Hi @Gabe, while this is indeed the case, i.e., in relation to the video in the first post the reversion back to 1.10.6 behaviour which was deemed to be the resolution to this specific problem resulted in the unexpected (to me at least) reversion, side effect (or whatever you would call it) of flowing frame text reverting back to individual lines of Artistic text which makes it completely uneditable...
That wasn't the initial expectation, as in, the hope was that where individual frame text items in a table like layout become grouped into columns, making it impossible to hide rows of text, the desire was that these would or could remain as individual frame text items to allow them to be toggled on or off individually while leaving longform text as editable frame text (as per 2.0.4) so while the former has effectively been achieved by reverting back to 1.10.6 behaviour that has had a negative impact on longform frame text as well, i.e., the expectation wasn't that longform frame text would also revert back to individual lines of uneditable Artistic text.
The issue (unknowingly at the time) seems to be that it's one or the other, where the hope had been for a solution that combined the two if that makes sense... so even though this was initially a request for an improvement it was reported here because there was also the bug where toggling layer visibility on and off wasn't actually hiding the text on canvas which has now been resolved.
I think, the modal dialog would perhaps provide the best of both worlds and at least allow users to choose between the two, and I agree, now we are where we are, yes, this is really now an improvement request/new feature rather than a bug.
I hope some of that at least makes sense...

The original report was about this ^, so we reverted it to the v1 behaviour. 
I agree, the modal dialog you get when you open a PDF would be a better solution, but that would be an improvement request/new feature rather than a bug. 

we are aware of this issue. 

I get it now. It wasn't your English. The screenshot was not very clear.  I'll get it logged. 

I believe we've been down this road before. We will not be investigating issues when running unsupported OS'. Sorry. 

It's probably just rending the thumbnails for the recents dialog. If you leave it for a minute or so, does the load on the CPU drop? 

Do they appear in a different order in 2.0.4? 

I'm afraid this is not a bug. I'll move it to improvements. 

Thanks. I'll pass this on. 

Hello, thank you for reply. Seems like the issues are gone with the latest beta .1736 build. I will do sepatate reports in the future. I apologize for the inconvenience.
Kind regards,
Roman

Thanks. Issue logged. 
 

The double click to change layer has Fill opacity within Blend options set to 60% 

Already reported earlier in this thread, I think: 
 
 

Thanks. Issue logged. 

Thanks. Issue logged. 

That's not a ghost artboard. In Designer, you can have documents without artboards, and this is what you end up with when you delete that single artboard. 
We are aware of the second issue. In the future, please create one thread per issue  

The beta version of the book function is very much improved. I have been playing with it in a multi chapter project and it is much faster and has not crashed. Also the book extension file would was corrupted sometimes and that has not happen either. So, bravo! I was thinking that a new feature of previewing the entire book directly in Publisher would really make it special. Exporting to pdf is fine but being able to stay in publisher and see how things are working together would be amazingly. 
 
if this is in the wrong section, I apologize, I wasn’t sure where to put it. 

Hi @J a n,
Space should work for the whole project ( temporarily, until you release it). There is no way to permanently hide the bounding box. 
Also, you cannot hide the red stabiliser line. 
Thanks,
Gabe. 

This is fixed in the latest beta > https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/forum/138-21-new-features-and-improvements/