schtiefel

Currently it's only possible to set export name, path and variables per slice. It would be a huge improvement if you could set general values for all slices, like Illustrators prefix and suffix settings. One way would be simple prefix and suffix fields in the export options tab, or there could be a project wide path constructor for all slices with user variables and path components like document name, date, incremental counter (for versioning) etc.
Even an option to add incremental numbers instead of overwriting, like when you download files with the same file name, would be something.
Disappointed to see that this is still missing in export persona in v2  In fact, it seems like export persona did not get any love at all in the update.

And...
I want adding 'FILE NAME' to list 'Variable'.
(for example: each event, each file  = within several artboards export with [filename]_[slice name].
 

Hello,
in Export Persona > Slices > Additional properties > Path components I can't find a variable for something like document name.
I want to export all slices with the document name (file name) as prefix, e.g. instead of "MyNicePicture_[ Slice name ]" I'd like to have "[ Document name ]_[ Slice name ]".
Maybe this is already available somewhere else?
If not, I'd like to kindly add it as a feature request  : )
Thx for any help.
 
Additional Properties:    >   

I'd like to add my vote here — being able to hide the outline would greatly increase usability.
For me the problem is not solely large brushes with much structure, but dynamic-sized brushes using pressure-sensitive input devices.
Because then I can't even guess where a stroke will appear, e.g. as in the attached example image.
Maybe there is already an existing option that I/we might have missed — or can we hope for a future release?
Thx for any help  : )

I'd like to add my vote here — being able to hide the outline would greatly increase usability.
For me the problem is not solely large brushes with much structure, but dynamic-sized brushes using pressure-sensitive input devices.
Because then I can't even guess where a stroke will appear, e.g. as in the attached example image.
Maybe there is already an existing option that I/we might have missed — or can we hope for a future release?
Thx for any help  : )

I'd like to add my vote here — being able to hide the outline would greatly increase usability.
For me the problem is not solely large brushes with much structure, but dynamic-sized brushes using pressure-sensitive input devices.
Because then I can't even guess where a stroke will appear, e.g. as in the attached example image.
Maybe there is already an existing option that I/we might have missed — or can we hope for a future release?
Thx for any help  : )