hannah

Ok. So cmd9 is the shortcut to view at pixel size.
 
Here are screen grabs of your file at 199% and then at 200%


Regarding your last post. If I move the ellipse I see a crescent of the black below. Which is understandable.
(rest assured I moved the ellipse (1px). The wrong layer is highlighted in the pic)

you might have to scroll down, Miscellaneous is the very last menu-point, that might be not visible if your screen-resolution is on the lower side. If that's the case drag the whole Preferences-Window to the top, as high as you can and then open the drop-down-menu again. You find it? I'd really like you to find it
 

You are not there yet. Where it says "Affinity Photo", right bellow "Photo", that's a second drop-down menu. You have to set it to "Miscellaneous".

Because you are not using the method @firstdefence mentioned in this post above. If you did, browsers would not render the text as pixels embedded in your exported rasterized image but as a separate HTML text element rendered over it. Note that in the W3Schools web page example, if you move your mouse pointer over the text, it changes to an 'i-beam' text cursor & you can select & copy it, just as you can with any other ordinary HTML text element on a web page. You can't do that with text embedded in a raster image because it isn't really text, just some of the pixels in that image.

1. Resampling methods
2. Kerning and text size / position
3. What firstdefence wrote

If you are designing a website, using images with embedded bitmapped text isn't really the way to go. Take a look at this: https://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_css_image_text.asp you will get much better results if you follow this method, its got a learning curve but definitely worth learning.
 
If you have to go the text in an image route, choosing the right font and colour is important.

It would be very helpful if you attached some files to look at
How do you resize them from 400 to 200 ?
 
It would be very helpful if you attached some original files.
 
I just did a test, exported as a JPEG at 200px, exported at 400px and resized to 200, then exported as a PNG (despite it saying jpeg) for comparison (no lossy compression with png.
 
I cant see a massive difference between them.

 

Hi Hannah,
 
Do you see the picture sharp in the Preview window? ( Photo Viewer)
 
Can you attach the image and a link to the web-page so we can have a look?
 
Resizing to a smaller size (in px) will increase the sharpness. So technically, a 200px will not be as sharp as a 400px resized to 200px. 
 
Thanks,
Gabe. 

It depends on the image size versus the file format used. 200 pixels is a tiny image, so text will suffer if you try to view it larger
 
Look at these two identical 200 pixel wide images I have included
 
The image has the text exported as part of the jpeg file, so the text is a bitmap. Enlarge it and see what happens.
 
The PDF file has the text exported as text. It will be sharp no matter what size it is viewed at. Although the bitmap will be poor.
 

 
In other words, you need the text to remain as text, which is why the CONTACT details are sharp.
texted.pdf

You are not there yet. Where it says "Affinity Photo", right bellow "Photo", that's a second drop-down menu. You have to set it to "Miscellaneous".

So, I did it for AfD, but I think I found the same settings in AfP. They have this double-dropdown menus which makes it really confusing, but you can defind your shortcuts for "Set fill to..." and "Set fill None" for deleting a fill.
Go to preferences>keyboard shortcuts and select in the menus what you see in the screenshots (one shows AfP, the other AfD).
Hope that helps!

So, I did it for AfD, but I think I found the same settings in AfP. They have this double-dropdown menus which makes it really confusing, but you can defind your shortcuts for "Set fill to..." and "Set fill None" for deleting a fill.
Go to preferences>keyboard shortcuts and select in the menus what you see in the screenshots (one shows AfP, the other AfD).
Hope that helps!

Hi. 
I often design seamless patterns and would like a way to test if I did it correct. In illustrator I tested this by fill a large square with my pattern.

Good day!
If you would like to copy a part of any vectorshape, now you have to
(1) copy the path, (2) select 2 nodes seperately, (3) break them, (4) ungroup the object, (5) delete the part you don't need. (6) break and delete node, if open path is required
OR
(1) copy the path, (2) draw a path on top of it that includes the area you'd like to keep, (3) mark the two objects, (4) use intersect-tool, (5) break and delete node, if open path is required
I would very much like to simply (1) SELECT the part of a curve I want and then press (2) COPY+PASTE to paste the selection.
 
Thank you for considering!
 
 

Good day!
If you would like to copy a part of any vectorshape, now you have to
(1) copy the path, (2) select 2 nodes seperately, (3) break them, (4) ungroup the object, (5) delete the part you don't need. (6) break and delete node, if open path is required
OR
(1) copy the path, (2) draw a path on top of it that includes the area you'd like to keep, (3) mark the two objects, (4) use intersect-tool, (5) break and delete node, if open path is required
I would very much like to simply (1) SELECT the part of a curve I want and then press (2) COPY+PASTE to paste the selection.
 
Thank you for considering!