Chris_Pearson

Please let Affinity apps recognise profiles with the .icm extension (which is the default on the Windows platform), working around the .icc only thing is time consuming, boring and annoying.
For those of us working in a studio environment where hundreds of colour profiles are stored on a server, and who don't want to stick them all in the OS's default location on each workstation, what do you suggest? It should be a simple matter to connect to a shared folder containing such assets, but none of the Affinity apps want to know.

Dragging and dropping, or placing, image files into a Publisher document treats the images as if they were 72ppi - in an ideal world the actual ppi would be honoured. If images have already been sized in Photo or whatever, it's pain in the neck rescaling everything or drawing boxes of the correct size.
For example, if I have a TIFF file that has been sized to 20cm x 30cm, I'd expect it to come into publisher at exactly that size whether it's 72ppi, 300ppi or 471ppi.

This issue is making Affinity look amateurish. It's things like this and a few other problems which are going to force me to abandon Affinity products: it's bad enough that they weren't picked up in beta testing, but to drag your feet fixing something as simple, but vital as this diminishes confidence in your ability to produce professional software.