Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Jeremy Bohn

Members
  • Posts

    594
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jeremy Bohn

  1. 2 hours ago, garrettm30 said:

    One thing to note when using auto-activation in conjunction with Publisher is Publisher will report missing fonts in a just-opened document before Typeface has the chance to activate them. Then after a couple seconds Typeface will make the font available. Another issue is that if you link an aPub document into another document, and the linked document has fonts that are not activated, Typeface won't activate those fonts. The solution there is to open the linked document separately so Typeface can know to open them, and then those fonts will also be available in the other document containing the linked document. (I hope that made sense!)

    Exactly as it worked with InDesign and FontAgent.

  2. I used to use FontAgent but ditched them when my old version no longer worked in 64-bit. Newer versions are 64-bit but it seems the features they remove outweigh the benefits of them rewriting the app to modern standards. I checked out both RightFont and Typeface and found RightFont to be closer to my needs but not quite there, or enough to actually buy it, but I did send a few suggestions to the developer. I think it needs a more professional list of fonts, just the names without previews, and you see the preview in a separate panel only when you click on the font. This is needed when you have thousands of fonts to scroll through. The previewed view takes up too much room, slowing you down. Also the ability to have auto-activation happen without the app open (FontAgent can do this).

  3. Yikes, that would be annoying. I use that trick often as well.

    Side note: I'm also used to triple-clicking to select a whole paragraph, which also works in Publisher. But I've had to untrain myself from triple-click-drag and moving the cursor up or down to select whole batches of paragraphs. This is because Publisher moves the paragraph text instead of adding to the selection. I wish there was a way to disable that so it matches the behaviour od the double-click-drag.

  4. 4 hours ago, garrettm30 said:

    I have long thought this is a macOS deficiency, and the very suggestion you have made for Affinity is what I have wished could be possible at the system level. I don't want to disable fonts that the system—or, for example, music programs—might use, but I don't want them cluttering the font menus.

    My opinion is it's only a recent deficiency because you used to be able to remove the foreign language fonts. Recent versions of macOS were more restricting. In Mojave I could remove most of the extra fonts manually with the admin password. Just some asian ones remained. Now with Catalina, the fonts have all been moved into the System Fonts folder, and that folder is now on a locked system partition. I also don't recall ever seeing Noto prior to Catalina, so I wonder if it's new for Catalina.

  5. I wasn't 100% sure on this either garrett until I noticed 1 million "Noto" fonts clogging my font menu in Publisher. I had to Google that font to figure out what it was only to find out I can't remove them. The fact that Noto doesn't show up in many Apple-built apps suggests there's a way to hide those kinds of fonts.

    I also put in a request with Apple regarding this subject. Either let us disable those fonts in FontBook, or provide a way for developers to hide them so each developer doesn't have to work on their own solution.

  6. No it doesn't work like that. I just tried it. When I select the new text, Past Style is greyed out.

    UPDATE > ok I tried it differently. It only works by selecting the entire text frame, not the specific text. So it's partially helpful but not the same because you can't just grab from one part of a text frame and paste it onto part of another.

    It also seems to just grab the formatting from the first line of text, so if the formatting you want to copy is lower down then you're out of luck.

  7. Yes, it also throws me off a little as well. In photoshop you have both live adjustments and destructive adjustments which sometimes would be nice to have. But currently I find it a little cumbersome to make an adjustment layer and then drop it onto the layer I want to adjust - an extra step. Unless I'm missing something, it would be great to select a layer and chose an adjustment, and have that adjustment automatically be linked to the selected layer.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.