Jump to content

Tim Clarke

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Hi @GabrielM This recording shows the problem. Note that before starting the recording, I had confirmed that the symbol's outer glow colour was from the document palette. If you can give me an email address, I will send you the document, if it is of any use to you. Tim
  2. If a symbol line/fill/effect colour is from a document palette, and that colour is edited, and then the edit undone: the colour of the symbol remains the new colour and is no longer linked to the palette. While hapening most of the time, it does not appear to be consistent, so more than one attempt to replicate the bug may be necessary. Edit: further testing suggests the symbol colour is still linked to the document palette. After replicating the bug, and leaving the symbol with the wrong colour, editing the fill a second time is reflected in the symbol.
  3. On checking the behaviour of non-global palette colours, before submitting the bug "[AD] Palette Colour Opacity", I noticed that for those colours a noise value can be set. This value cannot be set for global colours. However, the noise value is picked up (along with the opacity), but cannot later be edited. This bug is identical to "[AD] Palette Colour Opacity", except instead of opacity, it relates to colour noise. And it affects global colours only (non-global colours have a control to edit the noise). It's possible both these bugs should be combined. But in my experience there should be no assumption about the underlying code, and seperate issues should be reported separately. My apologies if I'm wrong.
  4. When creating a new palette (ordinary or global), the opacity (alpha channel) is copied from the selected object (if there is one). There is no way to change the opacity after palette colour creation. Even using "Edit Fill..." and using the colour picker does not work. So if (for example) a global palette colour is created, accidentally with a opacity value of less than 100%, it cannot be later fixed. It would require a new palette colour to be created, and each object referencing the incorrect colour to be modified to use the corrected colour. Thus in part defeating the purpose of global palette colours.
  5. Tim Clarke

    [AD] Noses! -- Advice Needed

    Thanks retrograde. I was out for most of today, and I think stepping away from it has helped. Yes, I think building up the shadows beneath the nose will work, and I realised too that I had accidently removed shadow work beneath the left eye (left to us, Zoe's right eye) so that side of her face is looking a little flat. I haven't had time to work much on it today, but fixing that helped a little, as did shortening the nose just a wee bit. Thanks for the tip of using multiply. I just looked it up, and it's probably something I should be using instead of the skin tones document palette I set up. I already did a little work on Emily's skin, but it's not too late to try the multiply blend on her skin instead. Thanks. I showed them both today. Zoe hates it and refuses to look at it! But she's eighteen, and tells me she hates that photo (in fairness she's got quite a strange pose --- one she probably thought was "grown up" at the time). Emily hugged me and said "I love your picture, Uncle Tim." Not sure how to take that. She might be only ten years old, but she learned the arts of sarcasm and being patronising years ago! Well for a first effort, I don't think it's too bad so far (I'll probably look back in a year and cringe!).
  6. Hi all. I just bought Affinity Designer on Sunday to take advantage of the sale. Except for minor edits to a couple of SVG files, I've not worked with vector art before (or really any art except my camera since I was at school about 24 years ago), and am enjoying it very much. I used to code software and considered it an artistic form of logic, and vector art seems to be a logical form of art. Well ... perhaps it's just the way my head works. But I did a couple of tutorials (one and a half anyway!) and am now working on a picture of two of my nieces. Intro over! Most of the work is just the foundation shapes and colours. Zoe's (the girl on the left) cheek line, laughter line, mouth (ouch, those squint teeth!) and nostril are just place holders. Her skin tones are what I was working on today, and I'm pretty much happy with. I realise I haven't yet done the shadows around her neckline, but at the moment I'm struggling with the nose. I just can't seem to get it right. I'm just wondering if some fresh sets of eyes might be able to see where I've gone wrong. Perhaps I've just been working on the picture for too long today. I'm attaching the picture so far, as well as the reference photo. And a close-up of the nose in case that helps. Any other criticism is welcome. They're both a few years older now (Zoe just left for university, and Emily is now ten), so I don't know if they'll like this. But I hope they'll like the gesture, and so I'd like to put the effort in. Tim PS Just noticed that maybe I need to add some more darker shades under the nose -- I've been concentrating on the ridge and sides. Unfortuantely I now need to get some work done and get to bed, but any input is more than welcome.