Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Pietrach

Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pietrach

  1. 2 hours ago, John Rostron said:

    My guess is that there are too many soft edges (clouds, waves) and not enough hard edges (rocks, mountains) for the auto alignment to work properly. (Or at least in Affinity Photo.) There seems to be a related problem in auto aligning astronomical images.

    John

    If this is the case, then it is extremely disapointing, as this image is not, by any stretch of imagination, lacking features which the software could use for alignment. Especially that the individual images were pretty much aligned any way.

    Auto Alignment is a must for me. Enough to be a deal-breaker.

  2. Hi 

    i have a series of nearly 40 images taken from a tripod each at 1/15sec. I wanted to stack them, align, and use Median stack to mimic a long exposure. This works flawlessly in photoshop, but I get all sorts of problems in AP. I do file, stack, select auto align, and on you go. The effect, with Median selected is very poor. Not only there is no or very little movement (long exposure) visible in the clouds, but also the images are more miss-aligned than they were comparing to manual stacking in layers.

    This is the resulting image from auto stack in AP (APauto-fail.jpg). 

    APauto-fail.jpg

    This is an image where I manually blended all 39 images placed on individual layers, without any alignment for images - as AP does not allow to auto align layers without using a stack as far as I know.

    APmanual-ok.jpg

    Am I doing something wrong? All images are exactly the same size.

  3. 1 hour ago, R C-R said:

    The loss of sharpness is due to using the Perspective Tool, which substantially increased the size of the tower. That required resampling the image to create pixels that were not there in the original image. Below is a comparison of part of the tower from each image, with the original on the left. You can clearly see that the tower is much larger than it originally was.

    compared.png.5118425e3bf99796470c56ef9decc416.png

     

    Thank you so much. i anticipated such answer. So there is nothing I can do about this. Do you know of any other methods of correcting the verticals without stretching the image and the pixels?

     

    thanks

  4. Original JPEG as came out from Capture One. I am happy with sharpness here. 

    https://drive.google.com/open?id=1FeLg_oTQdbBSYoNui88vrN0FGZOjxRgL

     

    Image edited in Affinity. Above photo was opened in Affinity, Perspective tool used to correct verticals (Planes: Single Plane; Mode: Destination) then Apply. Then Export to JPEG at 100%. nothing else. When you look at 100% at the detail on the tower, you will notice a clear difference.

    https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lIu6E1Vwbdln8m2PeWPpgYhRfp98caY1

     

    Thank you.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.