jenk

Members
  • Content count

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About jenk

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. You use a wrong tool, you need to use Divide operation to split the shape into pieces.
  2. There is no this problem in Affinity Photo 1.6.6. Gradient-32bit.afphoto
  3. No, it's not subjective. I created a gradient from black to white, performed one brush stroke with 100% opacity, and then created a curve representing the tool effect. The following two images represent how the Dodge and Burn tools work in Photoshop. The second with the Protect Tones option enabled. The following picture represent how it works in Affinity Photo. The Shadows is completely broken, they affects the midtones and highlights range more than the Midtones. It seems like the left part of the Burn (Shadows) graph is flipped. In 16bit mode the Dodge (Midtones) is also broken. Related threads: https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/48556-strange-bug-with-the-dodging-tool/ https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/11559-dodge-burn-brushes-behavior-and-defaults/ https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/30928-cant-burn-to-pure-black/
  4. Try SVG Optimizer to reduce the size: https://jakearchibald.github.io/svgomg/
  5. The <use> element works fine, see attached: use-opacity-bug.svg
  6. When there are rounded rectangles with a corners radius specified in pixels (not Absolute sizes), scaling of entire document (Resize Document…) does not affect the radius that leads to a change in the picture/design. It looks like a bug and not a feature. So there is no easy way, for example, to scale the icon set imported from SVG.
  7. The opacity attribute of the <use> element is ignored during import. <circle id="c" fill="red" r="20" cx="25" cy="25"/> <use opacity="0.5" x="25" y="0" xlink:href="#c"/>
  8. Export to PSD, why do you need SVG.
  9. When you delete the pixel layer, you get a group which contains only adjustments and filters in it, that leads to a different result. There's no bug, it's by design: But there is a bug with the live filter:
  10. The Invert command is applied to the current layer, the Invert Adjustment layer added directly above the selected layer. If you use a blend mode on layer, you get different stacking order and different result.
  11. It seems this is a bug. If you select a group (in the Layers panel) and set the color (in the Color panel or by Color Picker Tool) then all pixel layers in the group will be filled with this color.
  12. If you have the 216x162mm at 300dpi image that is equivalent to 2551x1913px. It can't turn into 5152x3864px.
  13. There are issues with declarations CSS classes separated by commas. .bs, .bm, .cr, .gt, .ky, .ca, .fm, .ni, .pr, .us, .ve { fill: #df2929; } And it seems also with CSS comments.
  14. To be precise, SVG (for the web) is not an option, it is a Preset (set of export options). Click the More button to see options. For example, without Flatten transforms: <g transform="matrix(0.922466,-0.386079,0.386079,0.922466,-87.7666,149.969)"> <rect x="256" y="256" width="128" height="128" style="fill:#ffffff;"/> </g> With this option, the transformation will be applied to the rectangle: <path d="M360.879,216.95l-107.929,45.171l45.171,107.929l107.929,-45.171l-45.171,-107.929Z" style="fill:#ffffff;"/>
  15. There are two ways to work around this limitation: just place all adjustments layers into an additional group add fill layer which does not change the image (white in Darken mode)