mykee

@thomaso Thank you very much for the video and the use of the switch is now clear. So even if the project is CMYK and the fill is only K, if the image color space is not converted when exporting, the switch is essential when using PDF export. It is safer to leave the switch always on. I added your step to my comment. Thank you very much!

I couldn't wait, so I tried your trick. It's brilliant. I would never have thought that by following these steps I could keep the K-only ability and still be able to tone down the greys. I'm posting the steps here for posterity: - CMYK project - paste the image - K-only button pressed - select the image - in the Color panel, select CMYK mode and set CMY sliders to zero, K to 100 - in the Color panel you set the Opacity slider (not the opacity of the image layer!) - when export your project use Convert image colour spaces option for perfect CMYK export I tested the exported PDF, and in Affinity Photo, turning off Composite Black in the Channels tab makes the image disappear, i.e. it only contains K.

Great trick, I will check it soon, thank you! This would solve my image editing problems. I'll solve the PDF back-testing with the Channels panel (like you did in Acrobat), and then I can actually use normal effects on the embedded images later. Does Total Area Coverage, which is in Acrobat, also exist in Affinity? Or should I add up the percentages in my head?

Interesting, but then it seems that masking can also cause such distortion in the colours, because I put in an image, masked the frame, and set it to K-only, and set it to 75% opacity. So the masking can be a problem on export. Thanks for the video, I absolutely understand what to look out for then.

However, the problem is that you can't really make any changes to a K-only image, because the program will export it incorrectly to the CMYK profile. So that means you should make any changes before you paste the image, then paste it, and then K-only. For example, in the case of opacity, why can't a K-only image be made to take x% of 100 as the export value, since black is greyed to white during opacity. So 100 opacity is 100 K, 25% opacity is 25 K, or no? Or whatever I set on the image (contrast, opacity) it will first execute and then finally drag the K-only "layer" on top.

It works perfectly well, I have Photo, so that's what I had in mind when I raised the issue. I can also check the PDF file back with this, thank you very much! The only thing I don't understand is that if I told the program to use only K-only for the images, it shouldn't include CMY when exporting, since the K-only option is inherently higher level, prohibiting the use of CMY (it was designed for that). So if I'm using effects or opacity, it should just modify based on K regardless of CMYK profile, even by rasterizing the image, since there is an option to rasterize what the PDF doesn't support. I don't usually use ICC embedding, I always turn it off because the press wants it that way by default, I guess because of the compatibility you mentioned. Is it perhaps worth turning off colour conversion when saving?

Yes, of course. I working with CMYK only in Publisher. I made covers and interior too with CMYK profiles. (I use FOGRA39)

I wonder how I can test this. In Photo has a meter, but I can't measure each image one by one, and sometimes it also converts the vector strokes to CMY values. I read in one of your comments that other tools have such a tool that measures CMY values that don't match, one of these would be good for Affinity Publisher.

Thank you for your feedback! It was not clear to me in the first place why once I set a vector to 0,0,0,100, it converts it during the Affinity export, even though I stay in color profile. Or if I set the opacity, why does it convert the CMY values if only the K value was set in the first place (i.e. why is the opacity in this case not x % of the K value?). So I'm reading the comments and trying to learn how to make a perfect K 100 only export from Affinity with CMYK profile.

If you could at least export directly to docx from Publisher, that would be good, because converting PDF back to docx is not so easy, especially because of the separations, which is not necessary for EPUB. This was perfectly solved by PagePlus for epub export. I was wondering how to get around PDF, but unfortunately I couldn't find any other solution.

I not only make covers, but also book interiors, where printing with black ink only is essential. So it can only contain elements that cannot contain CMY colours, only K. Is there a preflight option that I can use to filter out elements that meet this requirement? Unfortunately, the printer has repeatedly rejected the preflight because Publisher sometimes makes vector images stroke a non-CMYK 0,0,0,100, or if a K-only image does not have 100% opacity properties, the program will mix in a CMY value. Press can find these straight away using Acrobat, but I can't. It would be nice to filter this out before sending to the press.

Thank you @MEB, I have uploaded the file and I hope you can find the problem!

@MEB, @Dan C Thank you for your feedback! I reset the brush in the parameters, I used a masking brush. I tried it without and with rasterization. It seems like it takes the bottom, black layer and fills it with that as an inpaint image, and ignores the layer above it. The project is saved, I can upload it for testing (don't bother with the fonts).

I have a similar problem and I can't solve it: - PNG image pasted - rasterised - added a new pixel layer on top - In the Inpainting Brush Tool I set Current Layer & Below - the device draws a black line. - I reset it under the More button, but to no avail. Any other ideas? And result: I also tried putting just this picture in a group to do it within, but it didn't help. The base background colour is black (not visible between the layers, it's lower down), probably that's what you sampled from?

Here is the screenshot. In the other thread, we talked about having hidden text, and I set it to 1 pt, plus 0 pt line-height. I generated a TOC from it and got this. Hooray. It's getting frustrating in Publisher that it inherits the style when adding a new element. If I press the Revert Defaults button, I get the text fine without formatting, but then it doesn't work as a TOC, but as plain text. Okay, now I've tried it: if I press the button after adding the empty text frame and then generate a TOC, the letter will be correct. Annoying, but I'll try to pay attention to that from now on.

I've just tried this with TOC (because it takes over the formatting of titles, I don't know why). As soon as I pressed it, the text formatting went back to the default, but it lost the TOC fields.

True, but if I have the author and title within a paragraph, I can't align them separately (for example, author to the right, title in the middle, or a line under the author name), because that's paragraph formatting. I was thinking about this, too, to have it within a paragraph, but then the formatting is more tied up.

Thanks for the ideas for making invisible texts. The question is how much of a problem it will be for the PDF export, or what will be visible in print. In any case, you have posted some interesting ideas. I was wondering if you could also have sections in TOC, but they might slip when you break them. If you have more ideas, come, I look forward to it!

I would like a custom TOC structure. I have two paragraphs: an Author Name, followed by a Title 1. When I create the TOC, I want it to be in the format Author Name - Title. If I use Line break in Title this working, but should be the hyphen between the name and the title in the TOC. The reason I would use two paragraph styles is because there is a different font and layout for the title and author name. How can I make the TOC not see it as a separate paragraph and include the hyphen after the name?

Thank you, I will check it out soon!

I'm editing text for a book, and after I'm done, the new text boxes apply the text and font styles I used before, and make it difficult for me to reformat. Sometimes turning off text style is enough, but sometimes [No style] is not enough. There are times when parameters like No wrap or Superscript are left on, and I could go on and on. Where could I turn off the option to use a raw style for new text and textboxes, instead of inheriting previous styles, colors and others?

I used -240 for tracking, and Arial Unicode as font. Thanks, that's another brilliant tip!

Thanks for both tips, I'll try them and whichever I can use better I'll choose. Thank you very much!

That leaves the creation of the vector wave. I watched your video on how you do it, and I'll try to do something with the waves. Thank you very much!

Heading 1 always starts on a new page, but not always on the same page (so even or odd - variable). I thought of tying it to a style so that the distance, size, scale from the heading could be adjusted. Since each heading is a different length, so master pages would unfortunately only complicate things in my opinion.