lmphotoz
-
Posts
26 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by lmphotoz
-
-
@Mark Ingram we have previous comments on these forums where imagenomic portraiture 3 when opened inside photo causes a checkerboard effect on the image, meaning its tricky to use this plugin. While portraiture 2 plays nicely, is there likely to be anyone looking at v3 compatibility?
-
More of a question. One way of creating an artificial studio background with a light effect is to make a backdrop, draw a circle or ellipse and run a guassian blur (usually maxing the setting). However compared to photoshop Photos guassian blur is nowhere near strong enough to look realistic. Is there another way to achieve this ?
-
@Chris B @Mark Ingram appreciate the feedback fellas
-
@Chris B really enjoy the beta part of the affinity forum and its awesome how quickly the QA team are responsive to issues. Was wondering if possible, when issues are logged or queries made with the developers we could see the outcome of the conversation. Just to complete the bug report loop. Keep up the great work
-
When it arrives, I'm expecting the next iteration to have some pretty sweet fixes - the lads are doing a great job. Its actually very cool, and unique that us as users can interact with the actual developers. Thumbs up guys & gals.
-
-
Hey guys. Tried out the new beta with Imagenomic Portraiture 2. Great to see that Photo passes through accurate color information to this app now. Well done.
Hope that we eventually get Photo to play nicely (or vice versa) with Portaiture 3 - this is the version that causes the photo from AF Photo to look like a mosiac. Keep up the great work
-
@meb is Photo 1.7 far off its beta release ?
-
34 minutes ago, firstdefence said:
sRGB has a smaller colour swatch compared to Adobe RGB but sRGB has a brighter colouring hence the "blushing" Wouldn't it be better to set the camera to sRGB and eliminate the Translation away from Adobe RGB to sRGB that way you fix the "blushing" in ON1 RAW or actually on the camera. Or just keep everything in Adobe RGB. and keep the image slightly muted compared to sRGB.
@firstdefence I perfer the wider gamut of Adobe RGB which is why my camera and subsequently On1 Raw + Affinity Photo all use this setting. The only reason for the final conversion is that when I provide digital images to clients. When I convert for web publishing or social media I use png as an export via Affinity and the colouring is spot on, its only jpg exporting that for me at least is finiky. I guess if theres no way around I'll just need export client shots in On1 instead which, while not the end of the world, is an additional step.
When viewing the images side by side in affinity and on1 they all match so it doesnt appear to be any file generation issues.
The strangest thing for me is that this is happening when it hasnt previously with others software - case in point exporting via Photoshop Elements (before I left adobe) was perfect.
-
to avoid any possible issue with two profiles being presented I've deleted the unused one, rebooted the pc to ensure the profile loads correctly and have retried an export. The left is On1s export opened in Win10 Photos the right version is the equivalent Affinity Photo SRGB export.
I think that rules out any ICC clashes
-
@walt.farrell as mentioned above the image, its the spyder 5 icc profile. You can choose the name for the profile and I elected to keep the dell U2415 name of my adapter
-
@DWright this is my profile, ignoring the dell filename its a datacolor Spyder 5 Express generated profile
-
hi @DWright has anything further happened with this or is it unable to be replicated and hence closed off ?
-
@Roger C nothing back from Affinity officially yet. I had a play with another image and exported it twice out of Photo. - One exported as Adobe RGB, the other as SRGB. The Adobe version looks more like the original when viewed through Windows 10 photo viewer, the SRGB again still exhibits the redness.
The kicker is that when I load the SRGB version back into Photo it looks correct, and some people on other windows forums have indicated that it could be an issue with Windows 10 apps not acknowledging ICC profiles, and the effect is more prevalent on wide gamut monitors. The strange thing is that On1 Photo Raw's exporting of a SRGB JPG doesnt have this issue, I realise that different programs do things differently to get the same result but it does seem a drastic difference.
That leads me on to another question.......if one supplys images to clients as jpg files who wont necessarily be using a calibrated system and may be using Windows 10. How should we export files to ensure they receive what we as photographers see
-
9 hours ago, DWright said:
Can you please provide me with a copy of the RAW file and the outputted TIFF so I can investigate this further
Sure, via the forum or an email address
-
3 hours ago, jegog said:
It doesn't look like a colour-cast problem as the backgrounds all look very similar.
In No 3 the editing has warmed up the subject though the middle photo is a lot warmer.
Are you absolutely sure that the On1 and Affinity Photo images have the same colour profile?
I've checked a number of times to ensure the profiles are consistent with each programs export and they are.
-
2 hours ago, DWright said:
Can you please provide me with details of the source image format and the setting that where used to export as a jpg
The original file comes in from On1 Photo Raw as a TIFF file, is edited in Affinity Photo and converted to SRGB then exported by going into the file menu and selecting export jpg. The settings keep the same document size, 100 % quality, the resampling is the second to last option (though I believe I've had issues with other resampling methods also). I've used the allow document settings for the color profile and also manunally overridden to select srgb but have similar incorrect color results.
The odd thing is that I also export to PNG for smaller web versions of the same original TIFF and the results are what they should be.
-
Hi all. I'm having a mare with getting photo on windows to export to jpg correctly. I'm getting a huge red cast on skin. The images are edited in Adobe rgb, converted to srgb before exporting . The first image is from photo. The second is jpg export and the third is from a On1 photoraw export ...1 and 3 are as expected yet 1 and 2 differ...help
-
@Mark Ingram does the version address the importing of colour profiles into 3rd party plugins ?
-
Any indications on how many more betas there intends to be or when the next version is due for release ?
-
Imagenomic Portraiture 2 & 3 plugin has issues in Affinity where by
Portraiture 2 - Plugin loads correctly, but does not allow the corrected photo to load back into Affinity and causes the program to crash
Portraiture 3 - Plugin loads correctly, but the photo you have loaded into it is broken up into square pieces and randomly distributed around the image like a puzzle. Thus you cant work on the image. - Very strange
for reference the websites link is
http://imagenomic.com/Products/Portraiture
Imagenomic Portraiture plugin
in V2 Bugs found on Windows
Posted
We still have the well documented bug in V2 of Photo whereby the preview of Portraiture V3 and V4 brings up a chequerboard of the image. V2 of this plugin does appear to work, but is old and no longer available.
has there been any movement on this issue ( it’s been a good number of years and no response from serif or Imagenomic as to whether the issue will be corrected)