This is not new. Before iPhones and iPads the Mac was the choice of professional designers, photographers etc.
I have worked with both over my 30 year career in IT. At the end I was responsible for all desktops, laptops, servers etc but had a MacBook Pro and iMac at home for my photography work. I would have loved to have replaced all the desktops with Macs but yes the cost is high but an Apple Desktop / MacBook had a far longer working life and still do. I would argue that it’s the same with the iPhone and iPad as IOS tends to work on previous versions.
The Microsoft environment depended on the hardware installed so to manage a large stock of machines you could do this by building each one or use a disk image but if the hardware changed you needed a new image
Also consider if the Apple environment is pitched still at designers, photographers ( Adobe have appeared a few times on recent Apple Events ) the the ability to use the same kit and ethos throughout the product range just makes things easy.
You don’t have that with Android. Is there a desktop version? The take up of updated software is lower on Android. So there isn’t the same level of continuity.
Not knocking Android - when I was younger I loved to tinker, built my on PC, and kept upgrading it. I probably would have gone Android - I was tempted recently with the Hawei 30 Pro just for the camera.
Still have a dislike of Microsoft only because when they were ruling the roost they treated business clients really shabbily.