Jump to content

RPC

Members
  • Content count

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About RPC

  • Rank
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

256 profile views
  1. I'd like to request an eraser tool like the one found in Clip Studio Paint for vector curves.
  2. Many of the programs I use now days allow you to set a backup directory and have x number of the most recent backups for each file kept in that location. I like using these features as they give me a generated backup on a second hard drive, thus adding a nice extra layer of security on all my.
  3. Indeed, first thing I tried was changing the file name. I have a faintly good backup system well my computer is unattended things automatically sync between three different physical locations. I had just gotten into a creative zone and worked 10hrs straight without letting the system go to idle long enough to sync. So the only thing that was lost was this one project.
  4. Is there any way to recover a .autosave file where the linked parent is gone? I had a hard drive failure and l lost the original file, but there is an .autosave file that looks like it's exactly the size of what I lost.
  5. Looking at things I'd wager it's really the OpenCL support. 970 GTX didn't have OpenCL and the older and vastly lower powered AMD cards I had tried earlier in the thread had OpenCL support which was apparently enough to make them performance just as good as the 970 GTX without it. So now that I have a high end card with OpenCL support that's probably why I saw the huge leap.
  6. In hindsight I really wished I would have made a video since it really has been an amazing change that I wasn't expected at all. But since I wasn't expecting it, it caught me me off guard and I had already pre-sold GTX 970 right before getting the 1080 TI so It went straight out the door the moment it was pulled from the system.
  7. Just got a 1080 ti for a good price since people are moving to 2xxx cards. Just wanted to add/update to this topic that there is a night and day difference in how well large complex files with lots of effects are handled 970 vs 1080 ti for pan & zoom. Had I known there was going to be this massive of an improvement in quality of life to pan & zoom I would have gladly updated to the 1080 TI a year ago when I first made this post and paid all the extra. Things went from slow and lagy at best and crippling slow frequently to barely noticeable at all even on my most complex works. I can now pan and zoom as fast as my hands and fingers can move on works that use to slow to a crippling crawl if I tried to move faster than a snails pace.
  8. After noticing some oddness well working it dose look like it's changed a bit. A new layer is placed correctly in place if the current selected object is another layer. See attached video. Attached a second video to show that it also happens when the layers are not nested. Layer On top.wmv Layer on top not nested.wmv
  9. If I can help with anymore info let me know, not being a developer can't really say much other than what I see and as of 1.6.4.104 layers are no longer being placed where working again and are being placed at the top once more. It happens on two different systems with entirely different setups. As before if it's not a real error I'd like to turn it into a request as it is the industry normal to place new layers where working not at the top. I downloaded and installed nearly every single windows comparable vector program I could find to make sure it's the case and they do all work that way.
  10. This issue has returned as of Windows version 1.6.4.104 Stable
  11. Just installed the new 1.6.3.100 BETA right after making my last reply and this has been fixed.
  12. But because they are intended to organize objects it's highly inconvenient for them to always be made out of place when you want them where you are working so you can organize what you are doing. I'd also argue that it's highly nonstandard as in nearly all other vector programs even "Serif Draw X8" vector layers are inserted in place not at the top.
  13. Issue is back as of 1.6.4.104 Stable FIXED IN 1.6.3.100 Windows beta 1.6.3.99 When you "add layer" it always puts the new layer at the top of the artboard rather than where you are actually working. This bug doesn't effect "add pixel layer" it places it where you are working just how one would expect a layer to be added. Video_2018-02-13_111553.wmv
  14. Sure video attached. As you can see I have an object selected and the text is being inserted at the top of the layer list even above the artboard. Video_2018-01-27_090425.wmv
  15. When adding a new text object it is always being added to the top of the artboard rather than where you are actually working at / expecting it to go
×