Jump to content

abarkalo

Members
  • Content Count

    193
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by abarkalo

  1. Yeah you got me there. Photoshop's UI is really dated, and something more like hue vs hue in Resolve, or Resolve's highly precise eyedropper, ramp and matte refinement would be great. Still, if Photo can make incremental improvements here then I would be happy for now.
  2. Yes I agree that it is never a good idea to put actual design document in any DAM. However with template, mockup and element files it is a completely different matter. I want to find these design elements quickly by their tag, name and other metadata. I use Pixave for Affinity templates and Lingo for SVG, TIFF, EPS, JPG and PNGs. I greatly speeds up my workflow to quickly find and drop in templates/components. Here's one example: Someone sends me a Sketch file, and I don't want to continue editing in Sketch but want to import all the assets. I then use the Lingo plugin within Sketch. Then all the assets (I can pick auto or manual mode to import). Now all the Sketch components are in Lingo and can copy to the clipboard as SVG or PNG into the Affinity document that I'm working on. I don't have to deal with copy/paste from Sketch directly. All symbols are imported as well. I wish Lingo could would with Affinity but not as of yet.
  3. There is currently one product on the market (that I know of) that allows you to view thumbnails from Affinity Photo/Designer - Pixave, which you can get on the Mac App Store. Adobe Bridge doesn't allow you to view thumbnails, and you can't see a preview either. Lightroom is only limited to PNG, TIFF, JPG and RAW. Pixave handles more file types than anything I know of, and it previews Affinity quite nicely. It's the thing to use until Affinity comes with their DAM, which I'm really looking forward to.
  4. I would like to have an easy way to change ALL the specific hues in the photo, not just in a given area using the HSL adjustment layer. In Photo as in Photoshop I can use the HSL adjustment layer (Hue/Saturation in Photoshop). In Photoshop I can pick from 6 colors but I can extend or restrict the color range, or use the eyedropper tool to pick the correct starting point. In Photo, I can only manipulate the six set colors, and no eyedropper tool and seemingly no ability to extent/restrict the range. What I can do in Photo is select Select Sampled Color and then apply an HSL adjustment - but I just can't seem to fine tune as easily. In your Black and White adjustment layer you have a Picker. I would like something like that in Photo, or at least a method to duplicate what I do in Photoshop - see attached photo.
  5. The PSD displacement file didn't want to post- it got covered to a PNG - let me try again here . displace_jacket.psd
  6. HI Sean, Sorry it took me so long to get back with you. I tried this again in Beta 4 Affinity Photo and with the same result - I really can't get displacement to work there. In Photo and in Photoshop I save the channel with the most depth info - typically the red channel. I do a Gaussian blue of 1 pixel and I create spare channels and in Photoshop I save to a PSD file and in Photo to a PNG file as it says to do (and also there is an option to load layers underneath - which I also tried). Please see the results in both Photoshop and Photo. See the names of the files to see the result. Also I rasterized fonts in Photo and created a smart object in Photoshop. Please lmk what I'm doing wrong. I can't get this effect to work and this is a much needed technique for me. Alex displace_jacket.psd
  7. Hi I would like there to be a shortcut for transparency. I need to switch back and forth quickly and also I can't always work in transparency mode with the grid. But it take few few extra steps to go to Document then Color and then check Transparency, and then to uncheck later on. If there was a menu item then I could assign a shortcut to it but it's not there.
  8. Right now I love that Designer allows for embedded but editable files. There is one huge advantage to this as well as disadvantages - there are different use cases. Sometimes I really want to customize an embedded image for the document. This is the case when I start with a template/mockup - I don't want the original affected. And I LOVE that you can just open up right within Designer and edit there. I call this embedded-editable vs "edit with" as found in InDesign etc. What I don't like right now is that if I want to save that instance of what I modified in the embedded file I just cannot save that particular instance so I may use elsewhere. I have to copy all the layers and start a new file and then paste. However the lack of linked capabilities makes life difficult - not just the case of modifying a logo all throughout the document. Let me bring up another case. If you paste a PSD or a Photo file within Designer, then it's great that you can edit the embedded file. But wait, there are a lot of tool missing in Pixel Personal and all you really can/should do is turn on/off layers - which is great but limited (for instance the inpainting brush, my favorite, is missing, as is the stamp brush tool). But what if I really want to edit that file. I have to replace the file and make sure it's aligned just right again.
  9. It would be great to occasionally do some inpainting or blemish removal of an image I have in Designer. Yes I do know that I have a full set of tools in Photo, but sometimes I just need to make a slight correction and it doesn't warrant this round trip.
  10. I absolutely love this feature in Photo but I wish it was in Designer. Please move this to the top of the list in Designer. Let me give you a real world scenario. I want to create a box and put the label I designed for it. Certainly I can create the box in Photo and create the sides and shade and add noise. But once I'm in Photo the vector looks pixellated and I can't create the effect I want with the inked-in look that I want (adding blend types and noise etc). So right now I am forced to do this type of thing in Illustrator.
  11. I have tried several times but I am not able to get in Affinity Photo the high quality of displacement maps that I do in Photoshop. In either program I select the color channel for with the best depth information and save the single channel as a new pixel layer. In Photoshop I save the channel as PSD, in Affinity in PNG of course. When I work with the same images then in Photoshop and displace the result is usually very good. In Affinity sorry to say I get a mess. I watched the videos on your site several times, and you show type over a rocky surface. I've been trying to work on a logo over a fabric with wrinkles and folds and the logo disintegrates, whereas it folds nicely in Photoshop. I have tried reloading other color channels (from saved PNGs) as well as selecting from the layer underneath. This is a very essential feature for me and I really would like to see what I am doing wrong or if there this is going to be improved later on please let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note the Annual Company Closure section in the Terms of Use. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.