Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

lepr

Members
  • Posts

    5,522
  • Joined

Posts posted by lepr

  1. 21 minutes ago, Joshua Stamper said:

    what is 'promote group to layer' and why is it useful? If you've already grouped a set of layers, you can apply whatever modifications necessary for just that group, yes?

    I didn't know that you wanted to change all ledger lines to just one particular colour. The Layer instead of Group, in combination with disabling Edit All Layers, makes it easy to prevent other objects on the page from interfering with ad hoc selections of only some of the ledger lines.

     

  2. 15 hours ago, Joshua Stamper said:

    I'm needing to select the ledger lines and change their color at various points.

    Your ledger lines all appear to be black, so you can select them on that basis and put them into a Layer to make them easy to access by disabling Edit All Layers:

    • select any one ledger line
    • do Select > Select Same > Stroke Colour
    • press cmd+G to group
    • do Layer > Promote Group To Layer
    • use button at bottom left corner of Layers panel to disable Edit All Layers

    There will be a few black vertical lines in addition to the ledger lines in the Layer, but you can move them out of the Layer.

    You'll find the document much easier to work with if you give it a structure with various Layers for the various features of the notation.

     

  3. 2 hours ago, Joshua Stamper said:

    File attached. I can't cut through the staff lines or bar lines.

    Knife Tool refuses to slice through straight lines which have a fill (which won't be visible in the case of a straight line, of course).

    Your problematic lines have a redundant grey fill in addition to the grey stroke. Set their fill to none and then you'll have no trouble slicing through them.

  4. 4 hours ago, Ash said:

    There are ways we could do a hybrid tool in some way, but it is a huge amount of work - I guess we are wanting to figure out whether actually using the live filters from Photo do solve a lot of requirements that people have in this area, or whether we should still be looking to invest a lot more time in expanding the functionality of vector warp.

     

    In the absence of a hybrid tool, it would be very helpful if the Photo Mesh Warp live filter used the same meshes as the Designer Warp Group, and we could copy the mesh from one to the other.

  5. 5 hours ago, ZhangX said:

    Some of my Group icons in designer's layers panel have a round dot within them. Some others do not.
    What is the difference?

    The dot indicates the group contains at least one mask and no other type of object. You will see the same dot on a mask's thumbnail.

    The blank indicates the group contains at least one vector or raster object. It may also contain other types of objects. The Layers panel burger menu has an option for displaying a preview of the group's content in the thumbnail.

  6. On 2/1/2023 at 2:27 PM, Zero1 said:

    I assume this is a bug unless i am missing something here?

    Whether the result should be classed as a bug or not, I don't know, but I can explain what is happening.

    A live filter/adjustment operates on an on-the-fly rasterisation of whatever object it is applied to. That raster object covers the entire canvas, and its pixels are black with alpha of zero wherever the source object did not exist. If the filter/adjustment increases the alpha of those hidden black pixels, the pixels become visible to some degree, blending with the underlying scene, unless they are excluded by clipping by the object which is parent to the filter/adjustment.

  7. 2 minutes ago, smadell said:

    I'm guessing that there are multiple other combinations that would make this work, but Boolean logic always seems to break my brain a little.

    The Compound Mask operators aren't really Boolean although they effectively are Boolean when combining a pure "black" mask pixel with a pure "white" mask pixel.

    You might be more comfortable with the operators when you consider that they are really the equivalent of layer blending modes:

    • Add == Add
    • Subtract == Subtract
    • Intersect == Darken
    • Xor == Difference

     

  8. 20 minutes ago, R C-R said:

    Try selecting the Group of all 3 scaled down shapes, like in this group of 3.afdesign example, switching to the Contour Tool, & changing the radius on the context toolbar. When I try to do that, it flickers to other values but always goes back to 0 mm in the field in the Context Toolbar, while on the canvas there are strange redraw issues if I drag back & forth on the Radius label.

    Now I see the anomalous value. If you had initially said Group instead of explicitly saying the three objects, that would have helped.

  9. 3 minutes ago, R C-R said:

    It also seems to be buggy if you select all three scaled down shapes, switch to the Contour Tool & try to change the contour radius on all of them at once. At least for me, in the Context toolbar it always shows "0 mm" no matter what radius I set there.

    Not happening to me. The field in the toolbar shows whatever I set.

    Sounds like you have insufficient decimal places specified in Preferences for display of the values you are using.

  10. 17 minutes ago, Hangman said:

    Therefore still a bug as it clearly shouldn't... Also, curious to know if this affects Windows and iPad...

    Of course a bug!

    Did I say or imply otherwise? [rhetorical question, in case that could be misinterpreted too]

    I was only giving a little insight into what is happening, not a justification for the change.

  11. 29 minutes ago, Hangman said:

    As @,,, mentioned above, this is a CMYK document so all colours should be specified in CMYK. The elements are simple, again as @,,, mentions, you basically have two shapes using the same base CMYK green, i.e., CMYK (175, 0, 155, 0)... Note: these are 8-bit values, not percentages values.

     

     

    OK, I did say the document is CMYK.

    However, I did not say the two shapes are "using the same base CMYK green". I said the back shape is a lighter green than the one darker green that is specified in all nodes of the gradient fill of the front shape.

     

     

  12. The current V2 does a non-colour managed conversion from CMYK to RGB when a CMYK Pixel object is pasted in an RGB document. It's using the same simplistic formulas as the common online colour converters which do not consider colour profiles.

    V1 does a colour managed conversion which maintains colour appearance by taking into account the source and destination colour profiles.

  13. 4 minutes ago, Omi said:

    @,,,, thank you for pointing that out.

    I feel a bit sheepish about this, but I'm actually not 100% clear on how to specify a color mode for the gradient node color editor.

    Would you be willing to briefly explain how to do this?

    There is a selector for the mode immediately above the sliders in the node colour editor.

    It's at arrow 4 in the click sequence shown below.

    1090394830_nodecoloureditormodecontrol.png.ae5e025676eab0565c595ff3df25b563.png

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.