-
Posts
81 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by musiberti
-
Affinity Photo/ Brush Editing Panel not showing up.
musiberti replied to Gregory-CJ's topic in V2 Bugs found on macOS
Same issues here on a MBP 16“ 2019 (Ventura). Affinty always shows the beachball when changing the options in the brush editing panel. -
Global layers
musiberti replied to Tony Cotterill's topic in Feedback for Affinity Publisher V1 on Desktop
Still no global layers in version 1.8. Pleeeeeeaaaase, give us GLOBAL layers. It‘s essential. -
Still missing global layers in Publisher 1.8.
-
Foto Frames in Master
musiberti replied to Jostmuc's topic in [ARCHIVE] Publisher beta on macOS threads
Master pages in Publisher are currently useless for any professional workflow. I can not imagine that Affinity seriously wants to keep this concept. -
Sorry, but "NO"! It was clear from the beginning that the Publisher would be a harder piece of work for Affinty than Photo and Designer combined. In most cases, a graphic designer has to earn a large part of his income with a layout applicaton. Here, Affinity can not afford to do without basic functionality. After all, time is money. And nobody wastes time with workarounds!
-
No, the opposite is the case. In a document with many pages you will lose the overview quickly when you are working only with the existing local layers. Almost every professional Layouter works with "global layers", otherwise you will have to unnecessarily perform many simple actions several times . Luckily, Affinity has already announced in the forum that they are working on global layers. As I understand it, the "local" layers will remain as well. So everyone has the opportunity to use his preferred workflow. In the end, we would have even more options than in InDesign.
-
I agree to 100% to this review. Affinity had better done well to publish the Publisher as Alpha. The Publisher lacks so many very basic features for DTP (global layers etc.). Unfortunately, the Publisher is currently only a Designer with the ability to manage multiple pages. I am sure that Affinity will deliver many features until the final release. But in view of the necessary mass I have doubts whether this is feasible in the foreseeable future at all. Please Affinity: surprise me.
-
Affinity Publisher Public Beta - 1.7.0.58
musiberti replied to AdamW's topic in [ARCHIVE] Publisher beta on macOS threads
Great Update! But please don't forget the global layers. -
The functions of the apps inevitably overlap. This is not different with Adobe and can not be avoided synonymous. But the core features are already well recognizable in Affinity products. I have not yet used Designer and Photo for professional work. For my workflow, this is only when the entire suite is complete.
-
Publisher - some thoughts
musiberti replied to stunev's topic in Feedback for Affinity Publisher V1 on Desktop
-
Layers a little confusing
musiberti replied to Jeremy Bohn's topic in Feedback for Affinity Publisher V1 on Desktop
-
I would like to add a suggestion from another thread: Tagged Layers could be a working substitute for Global Layers. With the possibility of tagging any layer with keywords, we could achieve a similar functionality. You need a few more clicks, but it would be a substitute that is even more versatile. But I stick with it: without Global Layers (or Tagged Layers) the publisher is a failure. For me and for most InDesign/Xpress Users.
-
@MikeW: Unfortunately, most of the users here do not even begin to understand the difference between layers and master pages. Sorry if I'm desperate to make someone clear what "global" layers are. I had already tried to explain it many times. And then someone comes again who says "but with master pages I can do that too". Anyone who claims to be switching from InDesign to Publisher at this point in time is certainly no one who has to earn his money in graphic design.
-
Global Layers are not only for multi-lingual work. There are thousands of purposes and it would be a huge loss if global layers are not included in the Publisher. Please do not hesitate, that I do not wish the Publisher any harm. I'm just trying to make you understand that it would be a big mistake to voluntarily give up such a powerful function. Ultimately, this would also result in the Publisher's failure because it would not move anyone to switch from InDesign or Xpress.