Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

toltec

Members
  • Posts

    3,560
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by toltec

  1. 3 minutes ago, Oceanwatcher said:


    Yes and no. It has to be resampled as the number of pixels will be different from the original.

    But resolution as you call it, is not relevant for a digital file. Only for print. It is just a flag that tells a printer how close to output the pixels. So you could easily keep the same resolution when you change the number of pixels in a file. If you print the file, it will of course be a different size. A file that is 1000px x 500px @ 150 PPI will print much bigger than a file that is 1000px x 500px @ 3000 PPI. But both of them will look exactly the same if you put them on a web page.

    This is easily demonstrated by opening a file in Photoshop, changing only the PPI and save it with a new name. The file should be the same size as the original give or take a few bytes. PPI is just information to a printer.

     

    I think you need to clarify that. 

     

    Using inches for websites does not work either. At 1000 px your web image will appear at a very different size on a 52" tv or a smart phone.

     

    You don't need to use Photoshop. Us poor Affinity Photo users can do that too ;)

     

  2. There are over 200 videos from Serif but these 4 should point you in the right direction for "compositing" images.

     

    The fourth one is the most relevant for you but I do recommend you watch the first three first so you understand the basics of sizes, layers and placing multiple images in one file.

     

    Affinity Photo - Document Setup

    Affinity Photo - Layers Overview

    Affinity Photo - Placing Images

    Affinity Photo - Cutting Out

     

    They are on youtube and vimeo so just google them.

     

    Note, after placing images (third video), the placed images will be "Image" layers. That prevents a lot of editing so select each placed image layer and go Layer > Rasterise. Don't worry about why for now.
     

    If you get stuck, just ask :)

  3. 1 hour ago, RichRooster said:

    Hi MEB, I have tried this and it does not seem to change the dpi of the rasterized image. Here is what I just tried:

     

    1) I created two new Designer files. One with the document DPI set to 72, the other set to 3000.

    2) I dragged a jpg file with high resolutoin into both designer files.

    3) I rasterized both images. The resolutions of the end results are the same. 

     

    Is that how it is supposed to behave?

    rasterized_at_72dpi.afdesign

    rasterized_at_3000dpi.afdesign

     

    The resolution (pixel size) is set by the size you entered in Pixels in document setup. The DPI has no effect at all on resolution.

     

    If you used a page size (like A4) the dpi would affect things i.e. If you create a bitmap inside Designer at two inches wide, it should be 800 pixels wide if the document is set at 400 dpi. It should be 600 pixels wide if the document is set at 300 dpi. That is the theory.

     

    That is the only time the dpi affects the size.

     

    The dpi does affect how Designer sizes the image when you import (place) it. If you set a 4 inch wide picture at 300 dpi, it should be placed in your 300 dpi affinity document at 4 inches wide. If you set it 72 dpi, even if it is the same pixel size, it would be placed at a different size. See the picture.

     

    Exactly the same file, but the top one is set at 300dpi and arrived at 4 inches wide (place), the bottom was changed to 72 dpi (at the same pixel resolution). and arrived much bigger.

     

    resizing.jpg.ced35a38884a1e4f3281524fc90c2b58.jpg

     

    If you set the pixel size of your document to 6000 x 4000 (or much, much bigger) the file would be much, much larger, no matter what you put in the dpi. box. That only applies to bitmaps. Vector files will be the same.

  4. If you start blending like that, to be honest there is not much point. 9 times out of 10 it would be cheaper and easier using 4 colour process. You are trying to mix too many processes. Spot colours and bitmaps (basically RGB) etc. I don't actually know of any software that does that except for silk screen printing stuff.

     

    Because T Shirts are often printed on coloured shirts, 4 colour process is impossible because there is no white background. The prints are usually many more colours, one of which usually has to be white. There is some very specialised and very expensive software for that.

     

    http://www.ultraseps.com

     

  5. The chequerboard does not exist. It is just what Affinity uses to display a hole, because a monitor, like a piece of paper, displays white where a hole would be.

     

    Here is a document, with a hole (as indicated by the chequerboard display). Note, I did have to fake it by making a screengrab of the flowers AND the chequerboard, or the background would appear white on this page.

     

    cheq1.jpg.6c6964c65b5181def873b43c125d8178.jpg

     

    Note: Only one layer, no chequerboard layer !!!  It is just a display.

    chlayer.png.c93e8d2f62a17b34ea15e9ca15f6879b.png

     

    To "fill" it, I placed a layer with a picture of a sky

    sky.jpg.3000b0d40cee4cbd86ee7a12d3b3d44d.jpg

    behind the flowers.

    skylayer.png.5221595dedce995dd87f8dbf38630dbf.png

     

    The hole (as indicated by the chequerboard) allows the sky to show through.

    skyback.jpg.5d9a1d833255cca4af2ff03af0f4c07f.jpg

     

    To fill the hole, just put any picture layer behind the image and it will show through.

     

    Just one thought. You haven't done a screengrab at any time have you? If you do a screengrab of an image displaying the chequerboard, it becomes part of the image. i.e. no longer transparent. That is what I did with the first picture of the flowers. Otherwise it would just have just shown the white background when I posted it.

     

    If you did, you need to delete it.

  6. 25 minutes ago, American said:

    Are you saying that the layer on which I impulsively made the crop is THE layer on which I would be able to Clone, Patch, Paint, Copy/Paste additions to the photograph now "checkerboarded" because the crop threw everything off at least 5 degrees?

     

    Not sure what you mean, but you don't crop layers. You crop the whole document, which crops ALL layers.

     

    Also, one thing to bear in mind, Affinity does not discard the bit you crop. It is still there. Go Document > Unclip Canvas and it will reappear.

  7. 29 minutes ago, American said:

     

    Yes sir, that is exactly what I stated I *do* indeed do. I then said that I (and probably lots of Affinity users) deviate from that very well-advised standard operating procedure.

    Exactly, it's only a guide. Work the way YOU like.

     

    I only follow guides or rules until I find a better way :D

     

    Or, at least, better for me.

  8. The chequerboard indicates transparency. It is not a layer as such. It is a background.

     

    Any type of bitmap is on a pixel layer

    Text on a text layer

    A shape on a curve layer (although there are several variations)

    Adjustment on an adjustment layer

    Filter on a filter layer

    Mask on a mask layer.

    Lots of layers !!

     

    An "Image" layer is something else. It is an image that is "placed" (either you "place" it from a file or cut and paste something). It is independent of the main picture, it has its own resolution so you can resize it without losing quality. However, it means Affinity locks it from most editing. I think mainly due to exporting it again in PDF files but there may be other reasons. ?

     

    Look in the layers panel, if it says "Image" rather than "Pixel" then you need to rasterise it 

     

    To edit an "image" layer, you need to go Layer > Rasterise. Now you can edit it like a normal layer, although it does still keep its own resolution. Technically, an Image layer is already a raster/pixel layer (bitmap), you are just telling Affinity you want to treat it like a normal pixel layer.

     

     

     

     

  9. Why does it have to be rasterised?

     

    The problem is, when you Rasterise something, you are turning it into a pixel layer, which has to be RGB or CMYK. Or I suppose greyscale but I think all software treats that as RGB internally. it has to display it on an RGB screen.

     

    A spot colour has to be separate from that process.

     

    With your image Ideally create a white and a red vector layer set as spot colours and output as two spot colours.

     

    I don't know how you are printing this but remember, it does not matter what colour you design in when using spot colours. Your printer will need the red and the white as solid black films. That is all spot colours are when he makes the films or plates. Even CMYK are just 4 solid black films (with dots to simulate greys). Years ago I used to do spot colour printing from a program that only did CMYK separations, I used to set everything as black and magenta (sometimes plus cyan). I still ended up with two perfect (100% black) spot colour films. I just put PMS 245 (or whatever) ink on the "magenta" plate,

     

    If the white letter in the middle is cut out, it will be grey then? Where the background shows through.

  10. 1 hour ago, waltl said:

    Dear Friends,

    When I open either the Tonal  Persona or the Deveop Persona a panel appears smack in the middle of the photo and I can't seem move it. I can't drag down enough tograb the top. The Photo Persona doesn't do this/. Can you help?

     

    Should not get any panel.

     

    This is Develop on mine. Windows 1.5.2.69. I just selected the layer and pressed "Develop"

    persona.jpg.e41e097bfa1ddf64185e72e1002842c7.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.