Pšenda

I agree with you of course - I'm just pointing this out as an example that perceptions of ASuite's value for money may simply be different.

Have you tried what I suggested? That is, open the document in APublisher, and using Person use functions from APhoto and ADesigner (not switch to them). To me, it does exactly what an single all-in app should do. Apparently you didn't register dozens of angry users after the release of version 2 that the discount is only 40% of your fabulous/cheap price 🙂

Unfortunately, I do not understand the meaning of your response in the context of the quote from my post. I really don't see the relationship between "losing customers" and the mentioned "UI". P.S. I will also add my opinion about the loss of customers when switching to one all-in application, which will be unnecessarily expensive for many - why should they pay 3x as much when they only need to edit photos, i.e. no drawing (they also have a basis in APhoto) and no text functions (they also have a basis in APhoto), and unnecessarily complicated. Today, they buy one app that fits their needs and wallet exactly. After a certain period of use, they will find that drawing could actually be useful for them (after all, ADesigner is more handy for drawing), the applications understand each other (full file compatibility), they are already familiar with the controls, and other costs will somehow dissolve (it is not a one-time higher investment, and they are buying another function for which they are happy to pay something extra). The same, for example, with APublisher. So in the end they buy two/three apps one by one (they let themselves be lured into another by using one), which they would never do with an expensive all-in, and prefer to buy another simple photo/draw/text app they just need.

But already today, APublisher uses StudioLink to bring the functions of the entire ASuite in one application. However, the Person concept elegantly separates the individual tasks, including the appropriate adaptation of the work environment.

Since version 1, I've been using APublisher as the default application for all types of documents (*.afdesign, *.afphoto, *.afpub) and only use Designer and Photo Personas to switch for specific functions. And that includes the specific layout of the Toolbar, Tools panel and Studios/Panels, which I have adapted for the given use. So I definitely don't need one "monster" application, and it would be mistake from Serif in my opinion, because it would certainly lose many customers who use only APhoto or only ADesigner.

Personally, I would also like the fact that the selection of the brush (including the setting of its parameters) is modified according to the selected curve with the applied brush. As is the case with the parameters Stroke, Colors, etc.

??? Try scrolling the wheel above the edit field - as OP requested in previous post ("I want to change the width of stroke using the mouse wheel without any clicks"). Or click directly to edit the field, without the need to click to expand the pulldown panel.

Did you see my proposal? P.S. Serif does not have to invent anything new - it is enough if it uses the same element for the stroke width value as for the rounded corners value.

Is it within one or more documents? If your document already contains this effect, then I would use its copying - nowadays very fast using drag and drop.

You mean this? Or clicking on the appropriate vertical line that represents a certain level in the nesting hierarchy of layers and their groups?

Yes, but you must have the Stroke panel displayed. Since there is already an item with stroke width on the Context Toolbar (if it would allow editing), another useful panel could be displayed instead. It would be a shame not to make this item active (to allow direct editing of the value), thus simplifying and speeding up the change of stroke width without the need to constantly display the Stroke panel.

It is advisable to use a meaningful thread name - not only is it in line with the forum rules, but most importantly it can "attract" users who can then help you with your problem.

You are welcome 🙂

And why do some people still have cameras when AI can generate pictures for them on demand! And why do travel agencies still exist when everyone can have their picture taken (and that's what traveling is all about) anywhere in the world - just enter the AI "I'm at the North Pole" and I don't have to go anywhere. So is it "End Of Life of...." for all camera manufacturers, travel agencies,....? 🙂

As I mentioned earlier, all new production releases (and it doesn't matter if they have few or many changes) are always differentiated at the level of the third version number (2.0.0 - 2.0.4, 2.1.0). The build version is therefore completely irrelevant for users (except beta version, which is not intended for regular users).

https://affinity.help/photo2/English.lproj/pages/Text/text_general.html

Osobně si myslím, že je vždy lepší zkusit překlad do angličtiny, která je pro většinu uživatelů srozumitelnější, a tak si rozšířit řady potenciálních pomocníků a jejich pomoc (díky za ní) jim maximálně usnadnit. Rovněž je důležitá možnost okamžité "korekce" překladu uživatelem, protože automatické překlady nejsou vždy stoprocentní. A následný překlad do jiného jazyka je ve většině případů z angličtiny nejméně problematický.

So is it ok to provide the Build information in the update prompt?

"Transform Panel". See to submenu Studio - unHide Studio, Show Right Studio, maybe Reset Studio.