-
Posts
8,883 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Pšenda
-
-
1 hour ago, Red Sands said:
There is no hope.
Only for interest - this fact must have been obvious to you for a long time, so why are you constantly involved here? Why do you keep posting negative posts on anything that has anything to do with Affinity/Serif and its god forbid satisfied users?
- _Th, Paul Mudditt, PaulEC and 3 others
-
6
-
4 hours ago, GarryP said:
“Not A Number”
NaN is mostly a result of division by zero, which is probably a result of setting DPI to 0.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaNIt is interesting that the document has this meaningless value at all - if I enter zero DPI in New Document, the value automatically changes to 1 (which is correct).
So this erroneous value, which Affinity apparently no longer tests and corrects, must have been obtained by the document through some kind of import. -
2 hours ago, LionelD said:
In my case I “fixed” the problem by realigning my artboards
Just for information - the position of the Artboards is defined by the position of the "Origin" Artboard - i.e. the leftmost and topmost one, which is always at position 0, 0. Very easily (by moving or adding new artboard before/above this Origin artboard) you can mess up the right one (Pixel perfect) positions of the other artboards, or you can correct them on the contrary - by correcting the position of the Origin artboards by the necessary offset, the positions of the others will also be aligned, so they do not have to be corrected one by one.
-
-
5 minutes ago, LionelD said:
are you able to provide a link to Serif’s explanation, please? I need to read it, thanks.
For example:
-
1 hour ago, markw said:
100% Zoom; matches document pixels to screen pixels 1:1 I believe.
-
3 hours ago, PaulEC said:
sticky setting
Not respecting these standards (remembering preferences can be considered an absolute standard for modern applications), and not accepting dozens of user requests on this topic, is completely incomprehensible to me - it can make working with Affinity applications so annoying that it's hard to believe that Serif is not going to do anything about it.
-
-
1 hour ago, walt.farrell said:
The Surface Pro X uses an ARM64 processor, and runs Windows 10 or 11.
Yes, but "it" isn't what the OP is asking. Please read his question and topic title.
-
2 hours ago, walt.farrell said:
The Surface Pro X
What does Surface Pro X have to do with a question that explicitly mentions Windows?
-
8 minutes ago, Stun Damage said:
And vignetting will still be a fixed value regardless of focal length.
https://dustinabbott.net/2021/11/tamron-28-75mm-f2-8-di-iii-vxd-g2-a063-review/
24mm... There is a moderate amount of vignette (+55 to correct).
50mm... while the vignette diminishes (+41 to correct).
75mm .... while vignette is slightly less (+37 to correct). -
4 minutes ago, Stun Damage said:
take the time to manually correct the distortion in one of your photos
Since the lens in question is a zoom (not fixed/single focus), you would have to do this for all focal lengths. Then, according to the specific photo (focal length used), apply the measured correction parameters of the relevant focal length. That's quite a lot of work 🙂
-
Optionally forcing the use of a key modifier (such as Alt, which would complement the existing modifier keys Ctrl and Shift, step 0.1 and 10) would distinguish the desired change of the edit field from random scrolling of the canvas or list of items.
-
-
20 hours ago, vitaprimo said:
they ARE aligned perfectly.
You mean "pixel perfect"?
-
On 6/4/2023 at 4:49 PM, Old Bruce said:
I think it has to do with Slices being integer Pixels in size and are somehow rigidly fixed to the Document pixel grid. It just seems very weird in that an Artboard can have a pixel grid and items placed and sized to that pixel grid are integer pixels co-ordinates and sizes. Yet on export their slice co-ordinates and sizes are made according to the Document wide Pixel Grid.
Yes, Serif already explained it here. And by the way, it's also why Slices can't be snapped to grids and guides - they're just in a different/incompatible space.
-
20 hours ago, Grunt said:
Would be possible to create "light" build of Affinity suite? Windows version. Just for testing.
I'm just wondering - why would Serif do this? Why should he spend valuable resources (development capacities), which he obviously lacks even on regular/saleable applications, on some three other "testing" (so apparently not even saleable) applications?
-
Did you notice what I was reacting to? Where in this requirement does it talk about Export persons? Only StudioLink is mentioned, i.e. what it already does today.
-
6 minutes ago, gabriel_komorov said:
At purchase time you decide what modules you want, and then they are available in Studio Link. If you change your mind after purchase - no problem, just buy module you want
This is exactly how it works today with APublisher and StudioLink.
You buy APublisher, only Publisher persona works for you. If you decide to purchase the APhoto module/app, Photo Persona also works for you.- Bryce and Paul Mudditt
-
2
-
Hi @stokerg
Since the original object had a fill, two objects will be created during the Expand Stroke execution - a separate outline line and a separate fill.

But the problem is that the name of the original object is taken over by only one created object (in this case, fill), while the second object has no name at all - and must therefore be supplemented/copied from the first object. Is this desirable behavior? - personally, I would expect that the name of the original object will be taken over by both newly created objects (even if they want to differ in the name - perhaps with some suffix, it is still more convenient if the original name is listed there).
-
-
1 hour ago, AuthorAuthor said:
to use in version 1
Even in version 1 it was set to Ctrl+- by default, so you had to change it in Preferences.
-
-
On 3/23/2023 at 3:34 AM, Raydar said:
I am trying to use the color picker to select a color (nothing more), but when I select a color the entire image changes to that color.
Or Image vs Pixel layer?




I cannot put text on the front of the image.
in Affinity on Desktop Questions (macOS and Windows)
Posted · Edited by Pšenda
It's alright.

Save image and Open image with APhoto:
P.S. This is a "bug" in Affinity - image processing with such erroneous/incorrect data must be properly treated.