Pšenda

It's alright. Save image and Open image with APhoto: P.S. This is a "bug" in Affinity - image processing with such erroneous/incorrect data must be properly treated.

Only for interest - this fact must have been obvious to you for a long time, so why are you constantly involved here? Why do you keep posting negative posts on anything that has anything to do with Affinity/Serif and its god forbid satisfied users?

NaN is mostly a result of division by zero, which is probably a result of setting DPI to 0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaN It is interesting that the document has this meaningless value at all - if I enter zero DPI in New Document, the value automatically changes to 1 (which is correct). So this erroneous value, which Affinity apparently no longer tests and corrects, must have been obtained by the document through some kind of import.

Just for information - the position of the Artboards is defined by the position of the "Origin" Artboard - i.e. the leftmost and topmost one, which is always at position 0, 0. Very easily (by moving or adding new artboard before/above this Origin artboard) you can mess up the right one (Pixel perfect) positions of the other artboards, or you can correct them on the contrary - by correcting the position of the Origin artboards by the necessary offset, the positions of the others will also be aligned, so they do not have to be corrected one by one.

I'll just add:

For example:

https://affinity.help/designer2/English.lproj/index.html

Not respecting these standards (remembering preferences can be considered an absolute standard for modern applications), and not accepting dozens of user requests on this topic, is completely incomprehensible to me - it can make working with Affinity applications so annoying that it's hard to believe that Serif is not going to do anything about it.

https://affinity.help/publisher2/English.lproj/pages/Text/documentStats.html After click on words:

Yes, but "it" isn't what the OP is asking. Please read his question and topic title.

What does Surface Pro X have to do with a question that explicitly mentions Windows?

https://dustinabbott.net/2021/11/tamron-28-75mm-f2-8-di-iii-vxd-g2-a063-review/ 24mm... There is a moderate amount of vignette (+55 to correct). 50mm... while the vignette diminishes (+41 to correct). 75mm .... while vignette is slightly less (+37 to correct).

Since the lens in question is a zoom (not fixed/single focus), you would have to do this for all focal lengths. Then, according to the specific photo (focal length used), apply the measured correction parameters of the relevant focal length. That's quite a lot of work 🙂

Optionally forcing the use of a key modifier (such as Alt, which would complement the existing modifier keys Ctrl and Shift, step 0.1 and 10) would distinguish the desired change of the edit field from random scrolling of the canvas or list of items.

Try search this: https://www.google.com/search?q=lensfun+add+lens+correction+site:https://forum.affinity.serif.com

You mean "pixel perfect"?

Yes, Serif already explained it here. And by the way, it's also why Slices can't be snapped to grids and guides - they're just in a different/incompatible space.

I'm just wondering - why would Serif do this? Why should he spend valuable resources (development capacities), which he obviously lacks even on regular/saleable applications, on some three other "testing" (so apparently not even saleable) applications?

Did you notice what I was reacting to? Where in this requirement does it talk about Export persons? Only StudioLink is mentioned, i.e. what it already does today.

This is exactly how it works today with APublisher and StudioLink. You buy APublisher, only Publisher persona works for you. If you decide to purchase the APhoto module/app, Photo Persona also works for you.

Hi @stokerg Since the original object had a fill, two objects will be created during the Expand Stroke execution - a separate outline line and a separate fill. But the problem is that the name of the original object is taken over by only one created object (in this case, fill), while the second object has no name at all - and must therefore be supplemented/copied from the first object. Is this desirable behavior? - personally, I would expect that the name of the original object will be taken over by both newly created objects (even if they want to differ in the name - perhaps with some suffix, it is still more convenient if the original name is listed there).

Or menu Edit, Duplicate Selection (Ctrl+J), aka Power Duplicate - a very handy function that, in addition to duplicating the object, also performs the previous transformation operation.

Even in version 1 it was set to Ctrl+- by default, so you had to change it in Preferences.

I thought it was Ray 🙂

Or Image vs Pixel layer?