Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Pšenda

Members
  • Posts

    8,883
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pšenda

  1. 3 hours ago, Hokusai said:

    If you don't make a Layer

    I personally think, that the use term of "Layer" and "Layers" is not entirely correct and consistent, see your second picture.
    "Layer" is and should always be only one/single layer. As for the grouping of many objects and many layers, like Groups, it should always be "Layers".

    Here, I suppose, should be Layers, because is created a group/stack for several objects.

    image.png.cdd80accd04febc3689d20c7ade5d49f.png

    https://affinity.help/designer/English.lproj/pages/Layers/createLayers.html

     

    P.S. Actually, I do not really understand, why the Layer/Layers are there, why it is not enough the standard and logically cleaner Groups.

  2. 2 hours ago, Hokusai said:

    but I'm guessing that your problem comes from either subtracting something or combining them using the "union" operation

    No. As I described in my post, the webworld did not understand, what the "Layer Menu" and "Expand Stroke" means.

    webworld: "I do not know if Expand Stroke is supposed to create a 3rd layer automatically.  See the red arrow.  I am guessing that there is a button somewhere in the Stroke that I would have created the 3rd layer".

  3. 13 hours ago, webworld said:

    This book has three layersWhat is going on?

    Yes, it is show in first image, right part:

    - one (bottom) layer is fill rectangle (see point 2. Select the square... ),

    - middle layer is added circles group,

    - and top layer is expanded stroke from this circles group.

     

    7 hours ago, webworld said:

    I think that the author did not proofread this tutorial.

    I think, that you must read this tutorials more carefully.

  4. 10 hours ago, Alfred said:

    It sounds as though you’re in favour of combining all the functions of AD and APh into a single app which costs twice as much as either one on its own.

    No, definitely not.

    I think,that two/three separate apps are the right way, because they allow users to buy exactly what they need for their specific purposes. They are only interested in photography, they buy only APhoto. If their interest is wider, they buy both or all three apps.

    I would, however, like to customize the application according to the purchased licenses. Already today, the applications can do everything else with other applications - ADesigner can apply filters to photos created in APhoto, APhoto can draw vector shapes drawn in ADesigner (like text on path), etc. This is a big advantage of a common format and common engine applications (bravo, I say this as a developer). So just make it available to other applications is editing and entering specific parameters - make them modular to adapt their skills/Personas according to the licenses (Draw Persona in APhoto, Photo and Develop Persona in ADesigner, etc.). When buying two or more licenses, ASuite application would be created instead of a individual APh/ADe/APub applications, between which you need to switch.

    Perhaps I wrote it understandably :-)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.