Max N

Faced artifacts when zooming an image with multiple layers and masks. Artifacts in the form of transparent squares. Nvidia Studio drivers, latest, Win 10.

Now it is clear. And I at AP tried to figure out how the tool works, and did not see the difference. It turns out I tried the wrong program. Thanks for the answer. Help is not always enough to understand what works and how.

If it's not difficult for anyone, poke me into an explanatory tutorial on the "Edit All" tool. Through trial and error, I have not figured out how it works and what it affects.

Good day. I have added some clarifications. I would like to receive an answer that this is really not a bug and that this is how it works. I am recording a lesson on YouTube, and if this is a mistake, then I will wait for the correction. If this is the way it should be, then I will write down with recommendations how to minimize this effect.

Thanks for the advice. I wanted to record a video of using this tool and how it distorts I found it very old. I thought it was a program error. The distortion occurs not taking into account the shape of the selection, but taking into account the size of the original document.

Even to be more precise. X and Y - are the dimensions of the document. A1, A2 and B1, B2 - are the sizes of the selected area. I expect that: A = (A1 + A2) / 2 B = (B1 + B2) / 2 the formula is not accurate (for example, it may be difficult to correct it correctly). In real: A = Y B = X Application of X and Y in the split - gives the accuracy no higher than the use of any random number. If we take into account the size of the selected area in the calculations, then this can give a more predictable result. I think that the formulas should be more complicated and the algorithms are smarter than those that I suggested. But stretching the area to fit the document without taking into account the shape of the selection is daunting.

Perhaps due to the difficulties of translation, I could not convey my idea correctly. I'll try to show it to a picture Let me explain. When forming the image (perspective) Coordinates A and B are not taken into account. Although they are related to the image. But perspective is stretched to X and Y dimensions. As a result, a figure with an aspect ratio of 1:16 will be displayed in 1: 1 with the strongest distortion. The aspect ratio of the object (A: B) is not taken into account when calculating the image, and instead of (A: B), (X: Y) is used. This leads to severe distortion. The cat side can become long and the long one short.

The projection, regardless of the shape (proportions), is distorted to match the original proportion of the image. The video is more clear. Even if you create a 1:16 dinomical projection plane on an image with an aspect ratio of 1: 1, it will stretch and shrink it to a 1: 1 square. la.mov

When switching from pixel to vector mode, the selection remains active. And if you change the mask, you get what you see in the video. Без имени.mov

Thank you. As a temporary solution, yes. I would like in AP to be able to change the size of the palette.

I do not understand if this is an idea or a mistake. There is no way to resize a panel with a color wheel (palliter). You can change the size of the palliter in width, but not in height. As a result, if you want to accurately select a color on the color wheel, especially with a mouse, it turns into a fascinating attraction. I would like to name the ability to scale the color wheel (palliter), in this version it is extremely small. Even if I collapse all the panels, I will have an empty unnecessary distance at the bottom, but the palliter will not resize. The screenshot shows how it looks in Krita and in AP. In Photoshop, if I'm not mistaken, you can also scale the panel and choose a color without aiming like a sniper. I myself do not draw and this function is not critical for me, but the subscriber paid attention to this and wrote a comment. I tried how it works in AP and other programs and I'm sad. 🙁 The palette is where size matters.

Nvidia has been added to Geforce Experience Affinity Photo and Affinity Designer and Affinity Publisher has not yet been added. In general, good news :-)

I have 1660 Super. Graphics acceleration works under Windows 10.

Photo Customer Beta 2021.03.16 - 19.37.00.01.mp4

In principle, I cannot get two identical images. Tried it on different files, but it always turns out not what you save. I started recording the lesson, and I ran into the problem that the grid, when applied to the same image, but with a different resolution, changes the image. As a result of the lesson, it was postponed until the problem was fixed. The file turned out to be very large. Test.7z

When trying to replace the image with a raw file, the program closes. Desktop 2021.03.15 - 19.36.16.03.mp4

Yes. This is the same image. I changed the resolution to it when exporting.

There are two images. 1. High resolution image. 2. Low resolution image. 3. I deform the object into a low-resolution image. 4. Save the grid. 5. Apply a mesh to the high resolution image. 6. I get a different deformation. Photo Customer Beta 2021.03.12 - 19.03.35.07.mp4

Yes. In the help, I read this information. But this did not help me understand what this setting affects.

I did not find an answer to the question of what and how the brush mix modes affect in the help. I would like to figure out how it works. By the test method, I did not understand what and how this setting affects.

Artifacts with ripple tool in AD. Acceleration on the video card is enabled. Designer Customer Beta 2021.03.12 - 14.23.30.04.mp4

Now I have tested three modes. The problem manifested itself in the "Low Precision" mode.

I hope that the moment will soon come when the mix brush will work properly.

I have an idea to record a lesson on frequency decomposition (retouching leather, metal, fabric options). But if you record now, you will have to show the program with bugs, and I will not be able to show some of the tricks at all to AP, because for this you need a shift, at the moment they will only work in Phhotoshop. Of course, I can record at work in Photoshop and insert a video into the lesson, with the words "this will work in AP when the brush is repaired" but it will be strange to say the least. I would like to inspire love for the program in my videos, and not scare away with bugs.

As I understand it, these errors are not registered?