Jump to content

larsh

Members
  • Content count

    354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by larsh

  1. larsh

    change images?

    Hi, 1. it is not possible to mark more than one image, if I see it right. Once I gave new pics into the folder, there starts a column of symbols with the names of the pics automatic and seems to read every pic; but it is not to see in the pages with the images. And I think the PDF does not show the new one (but I´m not shure about this point, can´t test it now). 2. It is said above, the hoke in the references does not work, i found it too, not suddenly, not after a newstart of APu. 3. There happens nothing, if images are deleted; the old mirrored image is seen, so no information about the problem is told (may be in the PDF they are missing). 4. The question: if one will locate missing files comes nearly every newstart of a AFPUB, it has no function, I think. Say NO and nothing will happen, the known files are included. There is one more problem: if one say: YES, one must locate every image itself; here should be asked: would you locate the folder. For my work – it is not a bussiness one – creating workbooks with photographies, the last had 230 pages and one image per page, it is ok, really to read the images new if Apu is new started. If all pics are new or some of them doesn´t matter then. My test projekt today has 30 pages, and the AFPUB has 150 MB; so I think it includes the pics, but the setting in the document setup say: prefer linked. Bye, lars
  2. larsh

    bug export

    Hi, export a single page as a JPG it holds the px from book and change not to what I write in the form. Would be fine to fix the last settings. lars PS: TIMES is accepted by blurb.de (not: Times New Roman)
  3. larsh

    change images?

    No Video, sorry, Sean. If I make a book, there is a folder with all images coming say out of Capture1. Then I see this pics are not ok, may be the color... what ever. They will corrected. So, if really images are linked (and not embedded) to the APu file and I delete all the images in the source folder, stop APu and copy all new into the folder, start APu again, it should be clear that now the book shows the new images. But it is not. There is (only if select an image?) the button: replace image. This one I would like as: replace all. Thanks, lars
  4. larsh

    bug export

    Hi, Walt, your are right: export a JPG for printing. I select page 1 of a publication, form 1 comes up: Then I change to form 2 (420x360; Lanczos 3; 85%) what I get: 2888x2475 px in 300 dpi (in: Vorschau/ View). I want 420x360 px. Best, lars
  5. larsh

    a bug in Export 72 dpi PDF?

    OK, blurb.de accepts the images (it´s only 46 MB), but not: Times New Roman. But I will check it later, there is a print with accepted characters... Bye, lars
  6. Hi, my some PDF in 72 dpi shows pixel in the images (out of Capture One 11). Not in 300 dpi. It starts, I think, with the houses; see: http://www.larshennings.de/down/larshennings.de-still-01-19.pdf pages 86ff Reg. lars
  7. larsh

    a bug in Export 72 dpi PDF?

    Ja, es klappt jetzt. Mir scheinen 58 MB für 90 Seiten in 300 dpi ziemlich wenig (früher hatte ich 150...). It´s all fine now. Here is the link again: http://www.larshennings.de/down/larshennings.de-still-01-19.pdf I will check if the 300 dpi print will run with blurb.de in the day. Thanks again, lars
  8. larsh

    a bug in Export 72 dpi PDF?

    THANKS TO ALL! Lanczos3 (sep). Says not to click to: for Web. 58 MB for the 300 dpi 90 pages is not to much! Bye. By the way. Deleting pages so that left page becomes right the images not longer stay with the margins.
  9. larsh

    a bug in Export 72 dpi PDF?

    Hi, did it with embedded files. larshennings.de-teil.afpub
  10. larsh

    a bug in Export 72 dpi PDF?

    Hi, the print is done with 300 dpi; that works now and before. The problem is the WEB-PDF, which makes – now and not before – the trouble as you see above in the blue house, where not only the horizontal wires are wrong as Tomaso shows. And I see now, he thinks too, there is a preview used. Is there nobody who can make a JPG to PDF? So let us see what the friendly staff says. Best, lars
  11. larsh

    a bug in Export 72 dpi PDF?

    Hi, thanks a lot – but it is to much for me. Walt: 108 or 450 are set in the pre-settings. The problem is, that there are PDF which worked in 72 dpi: http://www.larshennings.de/down/larshennings.de-detail.pdf . Done with APu a version before. It worked in printing too, a book is on my desk! The book I make now, with APu 1.7.0.227, is the same empty form/ Vorlage as this one in the link above. What I do is as before: from Capture One 11 are made JPG: 300 dpi, 2550/ 1700 px and set to APu (the printed images are 21 x 14 cm). Before I did it, the JPG are OK in Vorschau/ View, then made to PDF in Vorschau, read again with it; fine. This JPG are read in OpenOffice too, fine. EDIT: And it is read by APh, fine. Then this JPG are set to APu and export to PDF with 72 dpi as I did it many times before: you see the result above. Export with 300 dpi it is OK too. I did not change settings or whatever. That´s why I think there is a mistake in APu 1.7.0.227, or a new pre-setting. There is one thing more: If the JPG comes out from Cap. O. in 72 dpi, I can see the problem in Finder in the small button. In RAW files there is a little JPG included (that´s all I know about), is there a little JPG inside the JPG? And reeds the new APu this one? Regards, lars
  12. larsh

    a bug in Export 72 dpi PDF?

    Hi, it is not for prints; that works. It is seen if made for WEB; look to the link, please; there only the last pics, p 86ff. lars
  13. Hi. 1. It would be fine after opening the image table by the button left and move a pic to the book, NOT to fix this table until esc is used, but move the book up and down and put pics into it in a first step. 2, better to free the table window to set it to the side with allways first position. 3. to show in this table which pics are included in the book till now and show the page number there. 4. the mouse should stay at the pic which was choosen last if the table is opened again; often I use the next number then. So I could choose the pics in a first step to the pages, second making it exact. Reg. lars
  14. Hi, what is the command: moving inside? If click on the pic is gone. I hoped to move it inside the frame, if the frame is smaller as the pic. Thanks, lars
  15. larsh

    Moving inside?

    Ja, thanks, that works. Better was, to click in the pic double and to get an arrow then and a main frame in the layer field, as it is on the frame layer. But for me it is ok now. Regards, lars
  16. larsh

    Moving inside?

    WUNDERFULL!!! If one – as I allways do – not make the frame first and then include the pic, but moves the image using the: include image button direct to the page, the pic becomes a frame. Two movings and the pic is where it shall be (1. up to left edge of marvins, 2. right down to bring it to the right marvin). But in the layer-table is no special second layer shown with the image. Is there a way to do my way and then open the second layer? THANKS, lars
  17. larsh

    Moving inside?

    No, I would like to move an image inside of the frame if the image is bigger (!) then the frame. So I can first see and then say in APu what I want to show (and must not go back to APh to change the pic). There may be a part of the page I will test the design: so or so or others... So the frame can be changed: smaller, longer... And the image should be move into the new form of the frame with its best part. Ich möchte den Rahmen beim Design ändern können, ohne erst eine neue Grösse des Bildes zu machen. Den Rahmen verändern, kleiner, länger. Und dann möchte ich das Bild entsprechend der Komposition neu im Rahmen positionieren (um am Ende vielleicht zur ersten Form zurückzukehren). Gruss, lars
  18. larsh

    Moving inside?

    Hi, please think about this, I asked month ago: to move a pic inside the frame, if the frame is smaller as the pic. Thanks, lars
  19. larsh

    Moving inside?

    WE TRY AGAIN
  20. Hi, if we look up to a skyscraper we see the floors getting shorter.A wide lens makes the floors longer. An ultra wide lens can make the highest floors higher than that one on the ground, which are in reality (meters/ feet) both the same.Is there a way, what I not see (perspective and meshes do not), to make the highest floors shorter floor by floor a little less, so that all floors in the image at least are on the same high? Thx, lars
  21. Ja, thanks. I used it before vertical but did not recognice that a second line stops the moving. lars
  22. Here it is! In the meshes tool (what shows no meshes) it can be done. If one set two lines horizontal the movement only works between them!
  23. Hi, yes, an adaptor, but only to shift, without tilt. The camera stands vertical, then 9 mm shifting. I tried DXO, found it as Plug in using in Aperture. And it break down soon. The DXO has the problem to short the floors below too, not so much as above in my pic done but it does. And with the perspective tool in APh it seems to be more below than DXO. It is possible to go down with the basic line too a little. Better would be to set the meshes free and only in a part of the pic (therefor: Beta?). I hoped to see the pic not so small... The way Filter/ distortion/ equation I did not see before and don´t understand; /deform does not work. Thanks a lot! lars
  24. Hi, John. The shown pic is not modified by me. I used a shift adapter and the lens nikkor 2.8/ 20 mm AiS. And the floor on top grow up by the lens – to much. If the growing would be the same like the shrinking of the floors in the perspektive it would be ok. I tried Liqify, Meshes and Perpektive. But the last tools makes the hole pic smaller and the proportions are nearly the same. Or one must compress so much that the first third of the house is deformed too (no window squares any longer). I need a mesh to lay it on a part of the pic (may be half). And by compress it it shall compress the pic above more then below step by step, at least floor by floor, that all floors become the same high, and the pic becomes less high. Please think to the tool Perspective with the meshes. If I could compress every mesh individual ist could help. Starting say in the middle (meshes = X) it could made the next X-y, then X-2y, X-3y... (in exact mathematics it is a little more complecated I think). If not autmatic (saying X= and Y=) it could be made by hand. Thx, lars
  25. How to set the camera? Automatik in RAW file? OK. But using a shift element with non digital lens? How to set the lens? Thx. lars
×