krbo

yes, at least it's interesting. There are some things I can try, will report if any success And I see some beta HD 630 driver. It would be nice to see some other HD630 report. meanwhile I've just tested pathetic old Radeon 5670 at work, it's GPU is just 3.5x faster then CPU but real picture export with several filters were really 3x faster with HW acc

Just to inform you that my setup of Win10 2004 build 19041.508 on internal Intel HD 630 (I5-7500 CPU) and OpenCL is a complete disaster. Unusable at all - GPU enabled slows a lot even RAW opening (from 1s to even 10s), simple mouse wheel zooming jumps, jerks, hickups, block and even hangs AP Video drivers are latest from Intel (have a Intel utility to watch updates) No panic here as this is a first test of HW acceleration of Win AP version, keep the good work!

more info: it's almost invisible in Photo persona RGBA/32 (HDR) after developing RAW it's much more visible in opened jpg @ RGBA/8 - this example is at 21% zoom after open (value by AP to max fill workspace) to me it looks like 0,1 value applied

there is something connected with zoom level but only with destructive filter - as zoom level is changed forth and back (with 0 value) sometimes pixels are visible sometimes not live non-desctructive - always a uniform grey, no pixels with 0 value

hi, noticed this after latest beta but it's also present in a release version: if we use non-destructive High Pass filter with value of 0 there is a nice, even, clean, grey screen without any pixel visible but if we use destructive High Pass with 0 level there are pixels visible like it don't start from a real zero. not a big deal, maybe even feature - I don't know.

I think this is a case of misunderstanding how raw file should look. Camera does not show raw file but developed jpg also as Faststone does not show raw file but embeded jpg from it. Only question is what's with tone curve and exposure bias setting in develop assistant.

I suspect .NET problem as it's error is also in my event log together with one I posted above first fires .NET error then kernel oh, and I must point out this is my first ever install problem with AP since the first public 1.5 beta on Win OS - it's a remarkably excellent job during these years!!!

first more info for Win7 x64: - I've made two downloads - same behaviour (stopped) - updated .NET framework from 4.7.2 to 4.8 - not helped - install stopped now I tried it on second location with Win 10 x64 v1909 and fresh download - no problem at all - successfully updated! tomorrow I'l bring this download to the first location

error from an event viewer: Faulting application name: SetupUI.exe, version: 1.8.4.647, time stamp: 0x5e8b26df Faulting module name: KERNELBASE.dll, version: 6.1.7601.24499, time stamp: 0x5d011905 Exception code: 0xe0434352 Fault offset: 0x0000c5af Faulting process id: 0x22b4 Faulting application start time: 0x01d60d91d2df5eab Faulting application path: C:\Users\nkrbavac\AppData\Local\Temp\AffinitySetup\10228658-7985-11ea-9efe-902b34a0b454\SetupUI.exe Faulting module path: C:\Windows\syswow64\KERNELBASE.dll Report Id: 12a5711d-7985-11ea-9efe-902b34a0b454

I'm confirming a problem, Win7 x64 (no SSD here) will try again later on another location

tested with full set of pictures (109) from the top post - everything went great! nice fix, thanks to the team!

Fresh beta 1.8.1.595 lists among other fixes: must say it was quite fast, will test it later - it's 01:00h now here

thanks a lot for your efforts - deeply appreciated!

no progress at all (latest beta tested) and I just had to search for another stacking software as AP failed again in a case of 400 images pity

yes, I was also confused as I do focus merge at least twice a week since AP for win was released and never ever saw that I hope devs will catch up the bug thanks for your assistance! regards!

Certainly, 50 images are waiting for you!

hi, I've stumbled to a bug using Focus Merge option, will report it here in beta but it is also present in latest retail version. Made a series of pictures - it was a handheld sequence so there are some shaking and moving between them. If I load all of them (50 for the test) AP makes merging but drops out first 16 and starts result from #17. (pic1, pic2) If I try merge on first 16 only all is OK, first 20 is also OK, but first 30 - bang - this time it drops last 14 pictures and stops at #16. (pic3) There is obviously bigger difference between picture 16 and 17 so AP gets confused but in any way no auto-dropping should be done - I should/would like to be a judge what to leave out in next merge attempt. No other stacking software I tried behaves like this so I would like very much to have this fixed, it's not easy to check in a bigger stack are all my pictures in, or AP had his thoughts what's OK

no need to register as Walt said and about "what to do" - it's not a clickety-click-mouse app, in brief: - you open HTML with it - you add CSS stylesheet - you add pictures if any (cover at least) and then you start to make an epub by adding CSS classes to paragraphs, divide chapters, insert graphics...

I was under impression it was solved (don't know why really) and somehow reappeared again. That's why repeated report

clarity and particularly clarity+high pass in a live filter chain are export killers reported that before - a little speedup was done but it's still slow

hi, already reported beta bug in reversing macro chain of old 1.6.5 macros reappears again in retail same as difficulties in managing filters order with mouse - impossible to move filter to first position in a chain with it ("Arrange" menu icons works OK)

yes, well known free LensFun project LensFun home

from here: https://av.jpn.support.panasonic.com/support/global/cs/dsc/ to https://av.jpn.support.panasonic.com/support/global/cs/soft/download/index.html#pfs I think this is latest Silkypix for Panasonic: https://www.isl.co.jp/SILKYPIX/english/p/

Silkypix is different story - it is official Panasonic camera software and they make new version every time with a new camera model (you can see a lot of versions at Panasonic download site). Usually specific for some models (you can't even download it if you don't enter valid serial number of the camera) Why they do that? Because they put correction data into a Silkypix itself and give you a highly Panasonic customized free version of software to be used with specific camera model. All other software vendors may or may not have (money!!!) that data.