Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

PaulEC

Members
  • Posts

    2,683
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PaulEC

  1. AFAIK you can't change the settings for the default new documents. The easiest thing would be to create your own presets exactly as you want them, but you seem to be against that for some reason. Personally I don't have a problem changing the margins for each new document, it's not really a major problem and it makes it quicker if you enable the "uniform margins" lock so you only need to enter the size in one box. I'm not sure why you're using a gutter setting when printing labels, I would have thought it better to use guides, but that is also really quick to adjust with the mouse wheel in the context toolbar.

  2. 36 minutes ago, gw_westdale said:

    I would suggest that it would be better for Crop to do a trim as well in some future version.

    Personally I prefer cropping to be non-destructive, so that's it's possible to change the crop later if you wish. It really isn't that much effort to rasterize and trim. (You can set up a keyboard shortcut if you want to.) Maybe it could be an option, but I really would not like all cropping to be destructive.

  3. 12 minutes ago, Joachim_L said:

    Foot- / endnotes are things I NEVER needed the last 35 years in business.

    This is really the problem. Everyone has their own ideas of what is "essential"! Until we started working on this current book I would not have considered footnotes/endnotes as "essential", but now trying to add them manually is proving more trouble than it's worth, (when we can just use InDesign instead). It depends on what type of work you are doing. For years my main DTP work involved posters, brochures, booklets and that sort of thing. This is the first time I've worked on a full length "scholarly" type of book, and it's proving to be a completely different ball-game! For my part, I rarely use forms or tables, when I do they are very simple ones, but I can see that, for someone else, better functionality in them is essential.

  4. IMHO - I think the biggest shortcoming in APub is the lack of footnotes and endnotes. I've never needed to use these until recently, but I'm currently working on a book with my wife which needs quite a number of footnotes. I was intending to use APub, but we are probably going to have to use her copy of InDesign instead just because of this issue.

  5. 31 minutes ago, Mignolyx said:

    MI sembra vergognoso che non si possa scannerizzare direttamente dal Affinity Photo. Davvero, la trovo una mancanza grave per un software di questo livello

    Please read Walt's post above. The problem is due to Windows lack of scanner support, not Serif.

    Personally I've always found it better to scan using the scanner's software, rather than taking a shortcut and scanning directly into any application.

  6. On 7/3/2020 at 12:54 PM, Patrick Connor said:

    It keeps the slider having a useful smaller range and therefore finer increments, without stopping other larger values being typed in.

    This is a good idea, but maybe it would help to have a tick box to multiply the effect by, say, 4 or 10 times? Not really sure, but some other software does have this sort of thing, so you can chose between "big" effects and fine tuning.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.