grapher

Why is this awfull bug stil here? after more than a year ...

Ok. never gonna happen i would find that alone thanks toltec

bah. Finally found it. Ctrl-K :o)

Hi, have a little problem cannot find a way how to jump to layer which contains selected object. I see only highlighted layer (if not expanded, then only highlighted group) in layer view, and i have to manually open the group, subgroup, etc.... use case - gui dev, have 40+ artboards, and 1000+ layers divided into many groups and subgroups ...

+1

mmm seems so. sorry for duplicity.

i have 20 artboards, zoomed to one specific, i want to drag symbol from symbols panel, designer zoomouts to all the boards...

+1

finally great work !

Sadly, lack of programmers is truth. we have aswell problem finding good programmers for our android dev department .

ErrkaPetti ohoho... now im payed great. Didnt know that... By adobe omg. yes. exactly. Cmon. Does that mean that when someone does not have exact same opinion as you, than he is wrong, trolling, payed? Personal attacks are allways welcome, when people have lack of arguments. To my "agony" posts - Yes, maybe someone from serif will read this and maybe, they will solve the things i (well MANY people if you read trough the posts dedicated to anchoring) see crucial. I hope for it, very much. So one day ill get rid of adobe.

mac_heibu - sure, you are welcome MikeW - thank you for your offer, ill take a look. On the other hand, i had nothing specific in mind, i just did some research few days ago, and did not find anything special that affinity have ontop QX so i was really curious what mac_heibu had in mind. Sadly, that part stayed without any answer. Errka Petti - im not whining. Im not understanding how anyone with 26 y of praxis doing DTP software can release this software even as beta. thats all. Its just my opinion. And people are starting at me. Fine, i will then explain my statement. But, you can have different point of view. Again, fine, have it. To be honest, i dont understand what you ment by WYSIWYG when we talk about software for professional use and not some fan project. I was looking forward to have whole my creative process in software from one single company. So simply yes, ill have to buy QX or stay with ID few years till AP grows up to meet my needs.

Petar, pease, be so kind and read my posts. you will find my answer there... i will not explain the whole thing again and again.... on the other hand, if you dont mind, i would really like to know which capabilities does not QXP have, because im at the moment in decision state if i will go for QX or wait on ID6 for publisher....

yea, noticed that aswell mac_heibu: How many times you think was QXP core rewritten? Do you really think that its running on core from y1987 ? No. Its constant development. And as you code, get feedback, you know what people need. And from time to time you simply rewrite even the basics.

1. you cannot compare programming 20y back and today 2. read the message on serif's pages: "Professional creative software" 3. do you know PagePlus? - they state on their web, that its successor (or alternative) is affinity publisher and pagePlus is now legacy. (Its first release was... hold on, tiger, 1991 !! If you can count, its 27y of development of DTP app) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PagePlus So, please. at least first try to get some info, before you start posting links to youtube(tm)

read my posts above and you will find answers..... sigh.... Enjoy it then ! With thousands !

inData is interesting piece of software, thank you for that. I havent met the problems you are describing, but its maybe because my work isnt based on data import, or such large data sets

well ID CS6 have great engine for tables and possibilities to theme them... Dont see why you would like to avoid it?

Sure, if majority will be satisfied with car with square wheels, yes, then its not for me On the other hand, look at forum, how many people are needing this feature..... tables are just a part of it.

somehow i understand that have cs6 collection, and to be honest, i really love to work with AF designer. only thing i need to be fully satisfied is rotating and scaling selected points and solved bugs with constrains, and symbols. Yes, i whined about points control some time ago, after being in roadmap for ages, without update. I work with many programs in different use cases. Like - making icons? have to use photoshop because of control of the points of curves, then import to designer. Webdesign - AF designer. DTP - small documents - designer, larger still IDcs6. Photo editing - capture one -> photoshop -> sometimes other one-function tools for enhancing.

no offense, but noone can explain to me, that flow of elements is not basic function for multiple-pages editor. In many cases other functions, even i NEED them for my workflow, i agree with you.

truth, but what i like about affinity is complexity - from designer and photo to publisher. All in one suite solution. For desktop publishing and web design i dont need more. You cannot find same approach in QXP nor in other apps (as far i know), excpt. adobe.

yea :o)

Mike, well, look at the development of designer. How soon you think there will be versions 2.x ? 1.5 - 1.6 took over year in designer, 1.7 isnt yet released...

I agree. Still, anchoring is extremly basic functionality for dedicated professional multi - page layout software. Noone can explain me why its not there. Sorry. I would understand data merge (hard, but yes, its not basic for me, even when i really need it), arrows or other tiny things.