Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Tupaia

Members
  • Posts

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tupaia

  1. Dear Affinity team!

    Can we get an official statement if the IDML (InDesign markup language) file format will ever be supported for export from Publisher?

    'Ever' like in the next few years...

    I assume you are aware why this is important in a mixed team with Adobe products. It's great to be able to import from InDesign, but as of now it's a one way ticked. Not being able to export from Publisher to InDesign means the whole team might be forced to use the Affinity suite, if just one member decides to use Publisher. That often results in the decision to not use Publisher at all.

    It would be desirable to leave the choice to the user, of course.

    In my book, the Affinity suite in the meantime is on par or superior to the equivalent Adobe programs (disregarded any cloud AI features etc.), but it's super hard to convince our office superiors to switch.

    If roundtripping would be possible, the matter would be a very different one.

    Even if IDML might not be fully feature complete compared to the .indd or .afpub formats, it is feature rich enough to work as a common ground. It surely would for our needs.

    It has been asked before, I know, but I could not find any definite answer to your company policy in this regard.

    Thanks a lot!

  2. +1 for IDML export from Publisher!

    I would like to introduce the Affinity suite in our architectural office, which uses Adobe traditionally. It super easy to open existing InDesign booklets in Publisher, but it's a one-way-ticket. That is why I could not convince people fully.

    Even if the format would not guarantee 100% compatibility, it would be a tremendous help.

    Thanks!

  3. On 12/14/2020 at 4:05 PM, MEB said:

    Hi luispedrofonseca,
    Only the management/developers know, sorry.

    Hello MEB!
    Sorry to say, but that's a ridiculous statement! Who else if not you has a 'direct wire' to the developers/management? This is an important feature, and not too hard to implement. It's there already, actually, but the fact that after isolating an object, any click on the canvas will un-isolate it again renders it useless. Take my word for it - I work with Rhino3D each and every day, which has a good implementation of this. Would go crazy if isolate wasn't working. AutoCAD, 3ds Max, Illustrator, ... they all have this. It doesn't make a difference if it's a 2D or 3D application - same principle. The point of an isolate tool is to be able to work on one or a few objects more easily in a complex document.

    You see, I love to work with the Affinity products, and use them whenever I can in our architectural office, and advertise it to whomever I can, but things like this are nasty spoilers.

    You have heard complaints like this maybe a 1000 times because this or that hasn't been implemented yet, but this feature is really ripe for fixing at last after years.

    Sincere thanks!

     

  4. Hello!

    A quick question without thorough research (sorry for that):

    I have a Publisher document with lots of linked images. The file size has grown rather big nonetheless (1,5GB as of now).

    The whole idea of linked resources/images is to make automatic updates possible, and to keep the file size low - which seems not to be the case, really (automatic updates work, however).

    Where could the huge size come from? Bug? Embedded preview images or something?

    Thanks!

  5. At least someone who gets the point... 😃
    Thing is: people usually don't miss what they don't know. Or in other words, we tend to stick what we are used to.

    SHIFT inverts the selection? Aww, allright, always did... Could it be any different? If there's a situation where this does not get me what I want, I used to click around until I have it selected... so what...
    Believe me, guys, the moment you are used to clean selection add/subtract, you won't want to miss it anymore.

    A more general comment:
    I work both in architecture and as an illustrator. Both fields intermix in many ways, of course. My first and foremost weapon of choice is Rhino. Boy, do they do things like this right! You can 'fly' with that program, if you get what I mean. Reason is that they did their interaction basics right, where it counts - selection / being able to have a mixed selection on component and object level at the same time / snapping /easy command invoking (shortcuts, aliases, icons) / modelling logic / modelling axis / great mix of 2D and 3D / precision / a certain 'dryness' and 'directness' about working in the viewport (ok, I'm drifting...)
    Anyway, the way they implemented the concept of 'window' and 'crossing' selection (like AD's surround select thing), combined with reliable selection subtract (CTRL) and add (SHIFT) is close to ideal. It's supposed to work like this. Anywhere.
    Many Autodesk programs do it the same way. 3ds Max, AutoCAD, Revit...

    What do these CAD programs have to do with illustration? A lot actually. Affinity could learn from them (and vice versa)! I don't understand why the moment it gets 'artsy', software tends to get 'sloppy' in a way, in it's user interaction. Same with Adobe Illustrator, or CorelDraw.
    Please, developers, think also outside of your box (if you don't already) and take highly developed programs like Rhino etc. as an example for things like selections. (same goes the other way around - Rhino isn't perfect, too, of course, in areas where AD shines).

    Thanks!!

  6. Hello!

    AD 1.8.0.555.
    I'm using a Wacom Intuos 4 for work, with the rocker switch on the pen assigned to middle and right mouse button. Have been working smoothly that way for many years now, in all kinds of programs (3D, CAD, Adobe, ...)

    2084024797_screenshotWacompanel.png.d444150fb624fb682c0b1637b5db3426.png


    Since Affinity switched to Windows Ink, there were issues, some of which have been fixed in the meantime. However, some remain:

    1 - On a panel (not the viewport), still a bubble is displayed when clicking with the pen-right-mouse-button.

    2 - In the viewport, when right mouse clicking with the real mouse, the context menu is shown at the correct location next to the cursor.
     But when right clicking with the pen, the bubble is still displayed, and the context menu pops up quite far off the cursor.

    3 - It seems not to be possible to resize the brush width of the Pencil or Vector Brush tool by using ALT-LMB-RMB-drag.image.png.08a98f38779d4655a0036007d7075bba.png
    The moment I click pen-RMB, the bubble shows, and there's no way to resize the brush width.

    When fixing this, please be so kind and test this functionality with the Wacom pen rocker switch assigned as above.

     

    4 - Also, as always on such an occasion, I'd like to suggest implementing a simpler shortcut for the functions "decr./incr. brush width with on-screen readout" and "decr./incr. brush hardness with on-screen readout"!
    RMB + ALT + LMB + drag is unnecessarily complicated! I'll keep reminding you of this until it's finally changed, with utter patience and insistence...

    Sincere thanks!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.