Michail

Linking live filter layers seems to work now. But there is no link icon in the corresponding layers. This is very irritating because linked layers are not identified as such. In adjustment layers, the link icon is displayed correctly.

Ich vermute, es ist so gewollt. Symbole machen immer dasselbe. Du kannst aber ein Symbol im Symbol-Panel abtrennen , dann ist es allerdings kein Symbol mehr. Wenn Du hingegen die Synchronisation aufhebst , bleibt es ein Symbol und Du kannst die Symbolebenen separat ein- und ausblenden. Denke daran, die Synchronisation ist immer Eigenschafts-bezogen. Alles, was Du im nicht synchronisierten Zustand tust (z.B. ein- und ausblenden), kann später nicht mehr synchronisiert werden - alles Andere schon.

Okay. Then they haven't removed it yet. It's important that Serif knows that. Maybe in the next beta ...

This happens automatically. You don't need to worry about it 🙂

The beta version is a pre-release version. You can install it independently of the normal version. In the beta you can observe bug fixes and future functions (current beta: https://beta-downloads.serif.com/download/affinity-photo-customer-beta-1.9.2.997.exe). The transition from a beta to a release version has been a bit bumpy in the past. The more people watch the beta, the smoother the transition.

The purpose of your white layer was already clear to me. How about this layer arrangement?: As a group, it would look like this:

I think it's great that you can organise levels of adjustment into groups. I would not have thought of placing a pixel level in such a transfer group. Is there a particular reason that you did that? Possibly it is only for organisational reasons.

As for me, I can recognise the person very well !!!

Aha, now I know what you mean. I had thought that the blend ranges (gear wheel) no longer worked. But now I see that the applied blend ranges lose their effect - regardless of the value size. I can confirm this behaviour. It also happens with other filters, but only with live filters. That's why I think it's a bug. The question must be answered by a mod. In the video, you can also see a jump behaviour of the controller. I also see this on my computer.

Do you mind making a little video (or meaningful screenshots)?

The blend ranges work as expected here. Possibly the cause is again the ubiquitous hardware acceleration. Deactivate it for a test: Edit -> Preferences -> Performance.

KeyboardState (On-screen keyboard).txt KeyboardState (Keyboard).txt

Yes, that is how it is.

Hello @Dave Hayes If you want to post another topic later on, what will you call it? 😉

It depends on the way you change the brush attributes. For example, if you change the size in the context bar or by clicking on the "More" button , it does not work. But if you double-click on the brush in the Brushes panel or click on the "Edit brush" button , it works. I don't think this is intentional.

First read thread, then write!

I can confirm that, and it's a good catch. On the other hand, since it is possible to create a new style with the same line width and a different fill, it is probably not intentional but a bug. Unfortunately, changing the name does not work either.

It does have something to do with the graphics card (GPU), but the option I am talking about is in the Affinity Photo settings. When you open the programme, you will also find the menu item "Edit". You don't have to screw around at your graphics card 🙂

Yes, it concerns the graphics card Menu Edit -> Preferences -> Performance -> Option Hardware acceleration:

I cannot confirm this. Does this always happen with the same image? If so, can you provide us with the image?

Many here have problems with hardware acceleration. Disable it to rule it out as a cause (Settings -> Performance).

Not if you save the modified macro under a different name. But the user is not allowed to do that either.

But what is the logic behind it ?!

Many here have problems with hardware acceleration. Disable it to rule it out as a cause (Settings -> Performance). If that does not help, it would be helpful if you could provide us with the image.