Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

dominik

Members
  • Posts

    2,743
  • Joined

Posts posted by dominik

  1. 35 minutes ago, BlueOcean21 said:

    Yeah i know :)
    but this tool is way ahead in terms of creativity, it's like a machine for infinite and unique patterns, just try it yourself :D

    the current way in Designer seems more like a workaround than a feature :/

    edit: maybe it would better fit in AF Photo cause its pixel based 🤔

    If it's a workaround or a technique is a matter of taste. I set up a template and this makes it quite easy to start.

    The above linked tutorial indeed relies on a pixel pattern that was first created with vector objects. But one can stay in the vector domain if you use symbols instead of export to PNG. See this article at Affinity Spotlight:

    https://affinityspotlight.com/article/create-repeat-patterns-with-a-live-pattern-preview-in-affinity-designer-for-ipad/

    It not only works on the iPad but with any version of AD.

    Cheers,
    d.

  2. 1 hour ago, BlueOcean21 said:

    Would be cool, if there is a pattern generator integrated in Affinity Designer :)
    Maybe something like: https://repper.app/

    Hello @BlueOcean21 and welcome to the forum.

    You can do this in AD. See these instructions:

    https://www.frankentoon.com/post/creating-seamless-patterns-in-affinity-designer

    It is not a tool itself but a way to set up your document. There are other tutorials, as well.

    Cheers,
    d.

  3. Quote

    I know it's just that the beta is further than the last full version but thanks for your quick response on this.

    This was really just unfortunate timing. The release version was released just a couple of hours ago (I think) now days and there was no time for Serif to come up with a new beta.

     

    4 minutes ago, A.Gonzo said:

    The answer to the processing of the tables concerning the TAB`S would interest me much more

    whether there is a more effective operation in planning ?

    I did not answer to this on purpous because I simply don't know. As long as you don't see it mentioned in the release notes of the betas it is not know if they are working on it or not. They usually don't comment on it as well. All you can do is wait. Sorry.

    d.

     

  4. 31 minutes ago, kaliun said:

    When I use inkscape, I find that the SVG supports to change the position of focus for a radial gradient fill.

    The docs of SVG also shows:

    https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Element/radialGradient

    https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Attribute/fy

    The attributes fx and fy is the coordinates of the focal point.

    I wonder if Affinity Designer has the same functions.

    Hello @kaliun and welcome to the forum.

    You can grab the starting point of the gradient with the mouse and move it around. But to my knowledge there is no manual input of the exact position of these coordinates.

    d.

  5. 47 minutes ago, PaoloT said:

    The Resource Manager is great, but not quick. To find something in the Finder, you have to click the object in the page, see it selected in the Layer panel, and then go to the Resource Manager to find the Show in Finder command. A right-click on the object in page would be much quicker.

    I see. I missunderstood your request and assumed you do not know that this functionality is already there. Just not where you were looking for it 🙂

    d.

  6. 7 hours ago, PaoloT said:

    A very handy command found in nearly all Mac apps is 'Reveal in Finder'. You right-click an imported element, and the context-menu also offers this command. If choosing it, you are automatically kept to the original file in the Finder.

    I find it incredibly useful, to quickly locate files whose original place you are not sure about.

    Also, a way to see a list of all linked objects would be very useful, but I see this is discussed somewhere else.

     

    Hello @PaoloT,

    this is why we have the Resource Manager ('Document > Resource Manager...'). Try and see if this works for you.

    d.

  7. 4 hours ago, Jeremy Bohn said:

    I want a normal list in a plain font and a preview when I click on the font to the right or below, plus be able to quickly switch the preview between a customer phrase and all characters.

    Main Type does this. But it is Windows only.

    maintype.thumb.png.ac4a5bb8a5f6033a6ef190b746414dd9.png

    But the custom phrase is only available in the font list, not the preview. I do not know if this has changed in Version 9.

    Cheers,
    d.

  8. On 3/18/2020 at 3:03 PM, affinityfan said:

    +1

     

    41 minutes ago, B13eL said:

    +1

    Hi @affinityfan & hi @B13eL,

    would you please be so kind when posting '+1' posts indicating what you are supporting. Is it a 'Shape Builder Tool' or a better named thread or 'Feature Request' in general? Otherwise your postings have not much meaning to others. You could do this by quoting the part of the message you want to '+1'.

    And, of course @affinityfan welcome to the forum 🙂

    Thank you both,
    d.

  9. I think, @eab's suggestion could be an interesting enhancement to the layers panel. But at the same time I share @walt.farrell's point about layers stacking order.

    This could be solved with the addition of layer tags. Currently layers can be assigned colours. Layer tags would be similar to these colours just that they are keywords. Some of the these keywords could automatically* be generated from layer names or even text content. Others could be assigned manually.

    Additionally to layer tags add a filter and sorting feature to the layers panel. That way one can show layers in any custom way without changing the stacking order.

    What do you think?
    d.

     

    * Perhaps(?) all properties of a layer could be automatically layer tags. This could be one way to include the missing 'Select Same' feature that gets discussed and requested over and over.

  10. 31 minutes ago, Fritz_H said:

    nope.
    Usability-Analysis usually combines professionals from multiple disciplines, like technology, psychology, sociology and medical.
    Usability does not care about YOU but about "all" (or the average person) 

    e.g. since the human eye has less "sensors" for blue, this color is not suitable for alarms and signaling etc.
    We can see red very well. Because of that traffic-signs are mostly red with white and black.
    Why no green? because red-green color blindness is the most common one. Those people could no see the message of a Traffic Sign designed in red and green

    Usability-experts ask questions like: why do I have to feed the Bank-Card into the ATM correctly?
    Why isn´t the machine designed such way, so that I can insert the Card any direction?
    Solution could be easy: just put the Chip into the middle of the Card and add 2 Chip-Contact-Modules (top and bottom) into the ATM.

    absurd example?
    well, have you ever used a USB-Type A ? I guess, you also hate the people who designed that nonsense - esp. since we have USB-C

    Ever changed Toner in a copy-machine? you will notice that the a Toner-Cartridge only fits into the correct slot.
    Even if you are completely Color-Blind - you can not do it wrong. This is also Usability.

    Why do you think the Buttons of a copy-machine are on the right of the device?
    because most people are right-handed.

    image.png.dad5244c333583c10ba8d044ab662002.png

    In a Forum-Posting someone suggested to change the levelling-tool of Photo to work in a 2step-process, like the Crop Tool.
    Thats a good approach to increase usability since its stupid to force the User to keep the input-Device-button pressed while doing precision-work.

    Or take the new "new File"-Dialog of the Affinity-Applications:
    several fails: big static "Preview"-Icons but they are completely useless besides the Info e.g. "A4":
    all same size, all same color, all same orientation which does not adapt to User-Settings (portrait vs. landscape),  not sortable, no favorites etc.
    The Search-Box is also on the right, but should be above the useless big Document-icons.
    The important part with all the specs is squeezed to the right , even the Color-Profile-Info does not fit.

    image.png.14cf338df761d5d39446941a912a23cf.png

    Usability is a complex thing; keep in mind the rule: "don´t make me think"

    kind regards
    Fritz

    I think you make some valid points. But your very example of the copy-machine proofs that (product or software) design can only hardly serve all needs of all users. It leaves left handed people out completely.

    I do not want to fight about this. I think good design is a really hard thing to do. And thus it is worthful to add and collect ideas to improve things as it is done here.

    Cheers,
    d.

  11. 41 minutes ago, Aammppaa said:

    @dominik Feather only affects the edge of a shape, where Guassian blur will affect everything.

    On a simple shape, as shown there is no effective difference, but try giving your shape a bitmap fill, and you will see that this too gets blurred.

    This 2009 page from Xara shows the difference…

    http://outsider.xara.com/tutorials/may09/feathering.htm

    OK, this makes sense. This can be accomplished only with workarounds (e.g. an inner glow against a uni coloured background).

    In this regard it seems to be appropriate to support this request 🙂

    d.

  12. 8 hours ago, Fritz_H said:

    by Usability Experts 

    I still have not got used to what 'Usability Experts' have done to Microsoft Office with their 'ribbons'. I keep searching and searching.

    I am not against improvements and suggestions towards usability. But I question some of the things these experts come up with.

    Note: I admit that usability is a very individual thing and it is very hard to serve every one's needs.

    d.

  13. 2 hours ago, Lindsay Gibb said:

    The one thing I miss the most from Illustrator is "Feather"   (Effect/Stylize/Feather) I used it regularly, now I'm loving Designer and have been for quite some time, but would be over the moon to have that feature !

    Hello @Lindsay Gibb,

    what would be different from Illustrator's 'Feather' effect when using AD's 'Layer Effects > Gaussian Blur'? See screenshot:

    gaussian-blur.thumb.png.5042bb6b2ff4b2cb34d56baf1c7bcf91.png

    Cheers,
    d.

  14. 10 minutes ago, Als_Short said:

    I was thinking the lenovo was going to be a better machine if I'm honest. I'm guessing having a dedicated graphics card using it's own RAM has got to be better than an intergrated using shared graphics when processing images. 

    A general advice would be to have as much RAM as possible. I do not refer to the graphic card's own RAM but to the memory built into the computer. It helps to make working more 'fluid'.

    d.

  15. 13 hours ago, Display Name. said:

    Its March 2020 now, Affinity Designer update 1.8.1... Still no .dxf export possible?!

    When can we expect this to happen?

    Hello @Display Name.,

    welcome to the forum. In case you did not read this entire thread before posting I want to point you to the following statement (from page 5):

    In other words it is not likely to see this feature in the 1.X line of the software. But this is just a guess from my side based on the statement above. For sure it will not be available within a short time since it is not part of the current beta versions. Only features that are in beta are close to be included in the next update.

    Cheers,
    d.

  16. 4 hours ago, Mandu said:

    Simply pasting any text into windows notepad will make it plain and then copy/paste that text into any application will also make it plain. No need for some external programs.

    This is true and is something I do when at another person's computer where I have to rely on what is available. But one has to consider Notepad also as an external program in regard to Affinity. Only that it is already there 😉

    Cheers,
    d.

  17. Maybe you could create a version within your AD file where all text is converted to curves? Then hide the original. Then you spare the extra step of exporting to PDF as Walt suggested.
    You could keep these seperate in two folder layers. One contains the original design, the other contains the vector only version. This should not be too much of organisation.

    I assume hidden layers will not get exported from APub.

    d.

  18. 10 hours ago, Robin Rowland said:

    Specifically turn off the spell check and just see any other potential problems.

    Hello @Robin Rowland,

    unless I am misunderstanding your request you can do this. In the Preflight panel look for the little menu icon right to the profiles dropdown. There you select 'Edit Profile' and close to the bottom of the list you find 'Spelling'. There you set it to 'Disabled'.

    d.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.