Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

IanSG

Members
  • Posts

    1,450
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by IanSG

  1. 1 hour ago, Pipit said:

    I don't want to convert the files to any other. I only want to open them up straight out of camera.

    I understand that, I'm just pointing out that there may be better ways of managing the current situation than using DPP4.  

    <edit>

    On a whim, I've just tried downloading a few 6D MkII RAW files from DPReview - AP handles them without any problems!

  2. 4 hours ago, Poohbear said:

    Thank you,

    I want to use XnViewMP as a DAM as it will read affinity files. I would like to do all the editing in Affinity and just use XnView to view all the thumbnails. If I am only opening the embedded thumbnail will I still get full size images in Affinity? As you see I am feeling my way since leaving PS

    Ken

     

     

    No problem - XnViewMP is displaying the embedded thumbnail, but it doesn't seem to access any data other than the thumbnail and whatever's held in the file header.  When you edit the file in your chosen editor, XnViewMP just tells the OS to fire it up and passes the file name as a parameter - it has no involvement in actually editing the file.

  3. 2 hours ago, mzzfdrc said:

    Why do you think open source is currently dominating web development or server software?

    It was open source from day 1, and it works well. So what - I'm challenging the blanket statement that "open source is even better".  Just because OSS works well in one sector doesn't mean it'll work across the board.

    3 hours ago, mzzfdrc said:

    But yeah, keep ignoring that OSS pushes innovation forward.

    No, it's an enabler, not a driver.  

  4. 11 minutes ago, mzzfdrc said:

    Competition is good, and open source even better,

    Sorry, you'll need to explain that - why is open source better.  And better at what?

     

    13 minutes ago, mzzfdrc said:

    but I suppose it's too hard to understand when you're used to thinking about computing as sports.

    Here's the thing - I don't think about computing as sports, I think about it as a business.  Yes, competition's good, but open source is just another competitor - it's not "special", it's not "morally superior", it's just another way of getting things done.

  5. 58 minutes ago, msdobrescu said:

    I see people here coming bluntly and saying "Serif will do that, Serif won't do other". Well, I know what Serif states, but I don't understand why serif allows them to speach for itself, as they are no employees and not empowered to carry Serif's interests. Or are they?

    Serif's employees are identified as such - the answer to "Or are they?" is a simple no.  The reason people seem to be siding with them is that their position makes sense!  Whether or not something can be run under Linux, whether or not an application can be developed at some arbitrarily determined cost, and whether or not there's some sort of market for it doesn't matter - the people whose job it is to gather the data have gathered it, the people whose job it is to analyse the data have analysed it, and the people whose job it is to make business decisions have made them.

  6. 37 minutes ago, walt.farrell said:

    It may just be a Windows thing, Ian. It is possible for an install that uses the Windows Installer functions to fail, and to invisibly leave the system thinking that the install is still in progress. At that point you can't install anything else that needs the Installer until you reboot. I have had that issue once with an Affinity program (some other silent, invisible install/update of a running program had failed) and once with another program.

    Interesting!  It's not something I've ever come across, but I can see how a compromised Installer Service would cause problems.  But it's not an Affinity problem though :) 

  7. 2 hours ago, NNois said:

    So If tomorrow let says a big studio contact serif and put enough money on the table I assure you Serif will make the conversion.

    Let me paraphrase that - "If it was commercially advantageous for Serif they'd make the conversion".

    1/  Serif know this

    2/ They're not making the conversion

    What does that tell you?

    As an aside, some might question the wisdom of being so dependent on a single customer.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.