Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

conrad2k

Members
  • Posts

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    conrad2k reacted to Ben in Which Mac Computer?   
    I just got a 27" 5K 4.0GHz iMac - and it absolutely flies.  Worth considering now while you can still upgrade the memory yourself, as it seems Apple are removing the possibility for users to upgrade their own memory in newer models.  I put 24GB in it for just £64.  The 21" 4K has pre-configured memory, so you'll end up paying Apple a lot of money for 16GB of RAM.  It also can't be spec'd up as high as the 27".
     
    Also - if you are looking for a new machine and a 27" 5K display - this is a no brainer.  There is no display better than this for the money.
  2. Like
    conrad2k reacted to Mark_A in Straighten + inpaint   
    When cropping a panorama, there's the option to inpaint 'Missing' areas. Please could you build this into the straighten tool too?
  3. Like
    conrad2k reacted to BlauerClaus in Stacking: Noise Reduction, Optimum number of images   
    Conrad2k, your question caused me to experiment a while. A very general answer is: there is no optimum. An optimum assumes that there is a number of photos from which on the result gets worse. This is not the case. Every additional photo improves the noise reduction. But the contribution per photo gets smaller and smaller, and the calculation time gets higher and higher.
     
    While adding pictures to the stack, my observations are (observed with 100%zoom):
    - the first 4 pictures significantly contribute to the noise reduction improvement, wow!
    - the 5.-8. picture can be considered as polishment, they raise the noise reduction of the picture to 90% of the overall  result. 
    - the 9. and 10. picture only slightly contribute to improvements, i guess it is now about 98% of what you can reach.
    - the 11. and 12. picture brings quite invisible improvements, its more the light than the noise that changes slightly
    - the 13. and 14. picture are the last pictures where I remark any visible changes at all at 100% zoom
     
    For more pictures, I have to zoom in:
    - the 15.-18. picture bring, visible with 170% zoom, still slight improvements on pixel level 
     
    Finally it is a trade of between quality, computational power, hard disk space and time. If you want maximum quality and you have a zoom of 150%, you see still noticeable noise reduction improvements between 14  and 18 pictures. 
     
    Another perspective: 
    - at the zoom level "overall picture" (cmd 0): the 11.-18. pictures do not bring remarkable improvements
    - at the zoom level "100%": the 14.-18. pictures do not bring remarkable improvements
     
    As you see,
    - 10 pictures provide super results for the overall picture zoom,
    - 14 pictures provides super results even for 100% zoom, and
    - 18 pictures are for purists. 
     
    Here the examples for 1, 4, 10, 14 and 18 pictures. Click on them to see them full size (each ca. 220kb)
        
     
    In any case, thanks to the Affinity Photo development team for this powerful feature. The noise reduction is impressive.
     
    Best regards
    BlauerClaus
  4. Like
    conrad2k reacted to Callum in Stacking: Noise Reduction, Optimum number of images   
    How conrad2k
     
    Most people use 10 images when stacking images for Noise Reduction. The image attached was achieved by stacking 10 images :)
     
     

  5. Like
    conrad2k reacted to MEB in Apple Photos Extensions   
    Hi talkgtr,
    Welcome to Affinity Forums :)
    Affinity extensions were revamped in the latest update (v1.4) last week. It now includes 6 new extensions for Apple Photos. Check this video tutorial for more info.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.