-
Posts
2,699 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Petar Petrenko
-
No one vector/bitmap based apllication hadn't (powerful) layout features when they started. And they need not any of them if the company offers separate layout app. It was OK for Freehand because Macromedia didn't have other kind of apps. What Adobe does is insane. Soon they will have three separate apps with same capabilities but with different approach. You can't work the same way with text in AI, ID and PS. And this is same with other features. PS has some text effects that even ID doesn't have. This is very stupid. And what if I use 3D modeling app? Do I have to ask Affinity to add such features in AD or APh because they are essential for my design work? And they must have it to be Maya or 3D Max killer? So, it would be better if pixel feautures are left to Photo, vectors to Designer and text and layout to Publisher, or much better -- only one app (yes, I know you don't agree). Separate apps with mixed features can lead to many mistakes and problems.
-
Hey, it was very fast since last update. Thank you very much. Can I say that we are counting days for the final version?
- 49 replies
-
- designer
- public-beta
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
TonyB wrote: Please find below the current feature roadmap for Affinity Designer. The list is a selection of features from our own internal roadmap we would like to share with our users. If a feature you would like isn't on the list then feel free to create a new post so everyone can discuss it. We read all the feature suggestions and consider each one very carefully. The idea is the list will never get longer. As we complete and release features then we will replace those features with new ones. But, there are still not new ones.
-
As you can see from the attachment, only "Layout" and "Type" menus (and few panels) are those that make the difference between the layout and vector kind of apps. So, if you and the others insist in puting some Publisher features into Designer and Photo, there would be no need from Publisher, because as you can see there are already some of them into Designer and maybe in Photo (but I am Windows user so I don't know that).
-
Thank you R-C-R, but I think you are too much worried about others. Let them have their own experience. it is the best way to learn. What are people risking using beta software? Their lifes, their computers could be broken in two parts? So what if they lose some file? Even the "old" software like InDesign, Quark and others can be "dangerous", too. Have you ever read any software agreement when instaling it?
