Petar Petrenko

So, it would be the best if we get plug-ins originallz written for Affinitty trio than adopting Photoshop's or some others and have problems with them.

I have some strange feeling they are already on their way.

Hi, is there a way to non-destructivly resample embedded images in Publisher/Designer to make its files much smaller? If not, it could be a good idea when creating a new Publisher document to have a "Resample to:" feature when "Prefer Embedded" is choosen?

Yes, I agree. The real image resolution is its size (W x H) and DPI just inform us how many pixels are used per measurement unit for printing.

It is STILL not a feature of Publisher. It is planed for the future and it is not a feature of Designer and Photo at all.

BTW, Pixelmator Pro created an extension for Photos (on Mac) where complete Pixelmator is loaded with all features: https://www.pixelmator.com/blog/2019/07/23/pixelmator-pro-updated-with-incredible-new-photos-extension/ I think someone from Pixelmator is following Photo forum.

@GaryLearnTech I can't find it in Publisher.

Just to have something to correct.

I thought you new that “the” was just example. What abou t the word “superkalafragelisticexpialydoushes”?

Ohhhh! My fault. I didn't see the tiny small rectangle at the bottom of the list. So, I didn't scroll.

Great! And now make ALL the permutations of EVERY word in text you have to make corrections.

Yes, they are here now. In "Filters > Color" and in "Layer > New Live Filter Layer > Colors". I can't find "Procedural Texture" in "Layer" Palette under "Live Filters"? Is it OK or not?

This is faster than F/R. I saw it first in Papyrus and I found it very usefull. It is spell checker not spell corrector, Can you predict all permutations you can make during entering text?

That is while typing. What about if you have to check another ones text for errors?

Hi, it would be nice to have a feature, as a shotcut, for swaping characters. Something like: place the cursor between "h" and "t" in the word "hte"; press the shortcut key; the word has chnaged to "the".

That person is Catalina Furutuna (as I mentioned before) and you just commented on her post about the Ghent test.

Obviously, I didn't notice your FB comment. If so, I wouldn't start this thread. Sorry. BTW, why any app is going to fail on this test? I just wonder.

A Quark user Catalin Furutna counted 98 errors. I put this link for A-Team as a guide to make PDF export excelent.

I found this link to PDF test on an Quark FB page: https://pdf-aktuell.ch/pa/language/en/disastrous-pdf-x-4-compatibility-with-new-affinity-publisher/?fbclid=IwAR3RmRuzr2-OpoZe0z4PNKRlJ83mqilHNJjGgQ1kv-zVwUWbcHs_Vwpifns

Sorry, I didn't noticed.

I never said I'm dissappointed of Publisher. I just don't like how Studio Link is implemented.

I'm just complaiming for a job partially done. If they claim the complete apps are integrated, then they had to do that, not to ommit their personas. When I click on a Photo persona to edit a Photo document with multiple layers, I expect to start immediatelly to work on it, not to additionally click on "Edit Document" and then again on "Photo Persona". BTW, negative criticism is needed also, to keep the Team awake. They must not fell asleep as Quark did it when on v. 3.31 and slept for abount 7 years.

Oh, lucky me. I found another [By Design] feature.

Maybe I think a liquify tool as a specific function?

That way I would launch the appropriate app which is not what I want. If so, why do we need Studio link then?