Jump to content

Petar Petrenko

Members
  • Posts

    2,987
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Petar Petrenko

  1. No one vector/bitmap based apllication hadn't (powerful) layout features when they started. And they need not any of them if the company offers separate layout app. It was OK for Freehand because Macromedia didn't have other kind of apps.

    What Adobe does is insane. Soon they will have three separate apps with same capabilities but with different approach. You can't work the same way with text in AI, ID and PS. And this is same with other features. PS has some text effects that even ID doesn't have. This is very stupid.

    And what if I use 3D modeling app? Do I have to ask Affinity to add such features in AD or APh because they are essential for my design work? And they must have it to be Maya or 3D Max killer?

    So, it would be better if pixel feautures are left to Photo, vectors to Designer and text and layout to Publisher, or much better -- only one app (yes, I know you don't agree).

    Separate apps with mixed features can lead to many mistakes and problems.

  2. ...Is there a way to make your red bleed rectangles not show up when exporting? Some programs give you that option. Another feature I would like is the ability to export just a portion of an artboard. With the project I am currently working on I have a front and back cover on a single artboard but sometimes I just need to export just the front or just the back. I think this was possible with FreeHand.

     

    Just use guides instead of rectangle.

  3. TonyB wrote:

    Please find below the current feature roadmap for Affinity Designer. The list is a selection of features from our own internal roadmap we would like to share with our users. If a feature you would like isn't on the list then feel free to create a new post so everyone can discuss it. We read all the feature suggestions and consider each one very carefully.

     

    The idea is the list will never get longer. As we complete and release features then we will replace those features with new ones.

     

    But, there are still not new ones.

  4. Yes, I did read it, Petar.

     

    Point is, where do you think the basis for the definitions that Alfred gave you came from? Most all come from spot color definitions then tweaked to fit the output gamut--which is what converting them at output does.

     

    But, other than if Alfred had them on the tip of his tongue, how do you think he dug them up? Try Google, you'll get plenty of flat color mixes.

     

    Once, I used to scan books that contained gold colors and analize them in PS. So, PANTONE is not the only way to find gold color definition. In the other hand, experience has a big influence in defining colors to fit yours expectations.

    Anyway, thank you for your answer.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.