Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

summertimeflag

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    summertimeflag reacted to iconoclast in Expand Stroke Error   
    The source of the problem seems to be that you created the shape with just two nodes and then finally clicked on the first one to close the shape. If you create the shape from at least three nodes, it doesn't happen, as far as I can see.
    Edit: But to be honest, it also works with two nodes. Why it didn't in your case - I don't know. But as it seems, you can repair the shape with an additional node. Just one more click before you "Expand Stroke".
  2. Thanks
    summertimeflag reacted to Pšenda in Expand Stroke Error   
    Yes, same problem with Expand (regardless of whether the leaf is in or out of the group).


     
    Edit: Interesting - just expand the leaf slightly, and Expand already works.
      
     

     
    P.S. I created an identical leaf anew (line, bend, close curve, bend) and it gives the same error.
      
    Leaf, problem with expand.afdesign
  3. Like
    summertimeflag reacted to redonwhite in some visible hairline that irritate   
    Hey guys,
     
    I was pointed here by MEB from another thread about this effect. Adobe Illustrator really has this figured out, see below for comparison.

    I think Affinity should move in this direction too, even simple work becomes challenging if you have to deal with these hairline fractures. Every drawing needs a labor-intensive extra step to be production-ready (my current workaround is duplicating offending objects a few times, works well unless there is transparency involved), and once you add all the extra objects you lose ease of editing.

    Below is what it looks like in Ai
     
      Of course, I have no idea how your anti-aliasing rasterization works, but my guess is you have to make some kind of a special case for edge overlap? Or maybe do rasterization on whole image instead of layer-per-layer basis? Or run some extra post-processing to make sure total alpha = 1 for every pixel?
     
    Hope this gets some love in future versions!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.