Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

GripsholmLion

Members
  • Posts

    100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GripsholmLion

  1. 1. None of your business.

    2. None of your business.

    3. None of your business.

    It is thanks in no small part to that "relevant minority" – whatever that is supposed to mean – that I and many other members know how to get the most from this software. That in turn has allowed me to run my very small and insignificant business effectively and, above all, affordably.

    So drop the attitude, please.

     

  2. @MikeTO's very helpful chart from a year ago suggests that it was never in Photo. It seems a little bit odd to me: given the same two tools, I would expect to see the same functions at least somewhere to convert between either of them; unless there is some technical limitation, obviously. TBH, I hadn't even noticed the difference until reading this thread as I habitually use Designer for text.

  3. To receive a different answer may require a different question to be asked.

    34 minutes ago, dandyse said:

    [...] not answering questions, but questioning the author's ideas / intentions / way of working.

    You made a suggestion and received fair minded explanations of why that suggestion may not be very sensible.

    56 minutes ago, dandyse said:

    [...] I really think the majority of users would be fine with the capabilities of PDF

    That is a bold and very probably inaccurate assumption. I am often very supportive of feature requests, but I cannot support this one.

  4. I admit that I am not familiar with Objective C. But in those programming languages with which I am reasonably familiar, alphanumeric array sorting is trivial. So I looked it up and it did not take much effort to find out that there is a function for it in Obj C, just as one would expect. So if this were to be implemented, it should not present any "major problem". Languages do not need to be accounted for; and supported non-Latin alphabets, i.e. Cyrillic, should already have been accounted for – there is a function for that as well – when the translations were added. In other words: it's technically trivial.

  5. This is not a criticism and please don't take it as such; but your view of other people's choice of words reads like an instance of knowledge fallacy. Not everyone knows what you, I, or someone else knows, but it's normal for us all to forget that from time to time. Perhaps a lot of people don't know the name for the people tasked with making UX decisions; or that such roles exist and are a distinct part of development (I would argue that UX designers are still developers in the same way as I used to be a web accessibility developer); or perhaps some people just want a shorthand for the cohort who work at a software company while they get their point across. I hope you won't mind if I refer to all such related people as developers because, believe it or not, I do quite like brevity. 🙂

  6. That would be OK if was an opt-in preference, as you have suggested.

    I long ago used an image editor which worked in this way by default. The UX team probably thought that it was a super idea, but losing a complex selection with one accidental tap of a touchpad is not amusing even the first time, I can tell you.

     

    10 hours ago, Hangman said:

    I still had my vector hat on

    One size fits all... 😁

  7. Just bumping this up as it surely deserves consideration. Having just completed around thirty focus stacks for a client, the clunky folder browsing method which is forced on the user got quite tiresome, especially as it always opens the last output folder rather than the last input folder. All of the stack dialogues – HDR, focus, etc. – could use some work to make the process smoother.

  8. I very rarely ask for anything, but this issue is a long time itch which I cannot scratch.

    Would Serif consider adding a preference to re-enable LUT thumbnail previews in the adjustment panel?

    Because I really miss them. I often use LUTs as a quick and effective way of finally unifying photos for websites, but that has become so needlessly awkward since the thumbnails were removed quite some time ago (late version 1, I think?). As a consequence, I trimmed the list to an absolute minimum and renamed some, but it is hardly ideal.

    If there was a performance problem, then I can empathise with that (although my old Intel Macs never struggled with the previews – they run Affinity pretty well).

    But please provide the option to enable the previews for those of us who use LUTs.

    Apologies if this has been requested before, but I searched and found nothing here.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.