Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

pulse

New Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Hmm - yeah, this does work and it's actually easier than the rectangle method. Still, that's *a lot* of extra steps just to select a few tiles on a grid accurately. A snappy behavior with the marquee tool would be a lot quicker and intuitive. But I'll guess I can live with this - thanks for the suggestion.
  2. This actually helps, thanks! This one I do know of but it's still a bit of a clunky solution since a lot of my workflow depends on quickly rearranging tiles and tilesets. If there's no other workaround I guess I'll use this, although I have to say the workflow is a lot smoother in GIMP just because the selection automatically snaps to the grid and you can for example quickly move a bunch of tiles around. Thanks though!
  3. Hi. First time posting here. I got myself the Affinity suite recently as I'd like to finally switch from GIMP to something more powerful. There's two features I really miss in Affinity that come standard in GIMP. First one is marquee adjusting: As you can hopefully see above, it's very easy to adjust the current selection by simply clicking on it and then dragging the corners, resizing it in the process. In Affinity I haven't found a way to do it, other than going to the Transform pane and then setting X, Y, W, and H manually. Granted you can do it by pressing down on the labels and moving, but it's not as intuitive. The other feature I REALLY miss is snapping selection to grid. It works something like this in GIMP: I work with tiles and a lot of my workflow involves creating tilesets, which means I usually have to copy a lot of grid-locked pieces from source graphics to create a tileset. I haven't found a good way to do what the GIF shows above in Affinity, the only way I've found is to use the Rectangle tool, create a rectangle (that one DOES snap to grid), ctrl-click the layer to create a pixel selection, and then remove the rectangle, which is just cumbersome and takes a lot longer. Please let me know if there's easier workarounds around these issues that I haven't found, I've only been using the Affinity suite for a very short time so it might be that I just haven't figured it out. Alternatively it would be really awesome to get something like these features integrated into the software. I do love Affinity, these two things are the only things that really jam a fork in my workflow.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.