Matterdor
-
Posts
13 -
Joined
Posts posted by Matterdor
-
-
I purchased a number of licenses for my family members. I want to get them upgrades to V2 but would like to first move theses licenses across to an account for each of them so they can get the bonus upgrade stuff. Is this possible?
Edit - I know that there isn't an official upgrade but there is some free stuff that V1 users get when buying a V2 license.
-
On 11/28/2022 at 10:00 AM, walt.farrell said:
The Affinity Suite has never provided backward compatibility. Even in V1,
- 1.8 could not open files saved by 1.9
- 1.7 could not open files saved by 1.8
- 1.6 could not open files saved by 1.7
- etc.
V2 simply carries on that behavior, and 1.x cannot open 2.x files.
I just got bitten by this while testing and I am only a casual user. I have bought one V2 upgrade while I wait for the full installer. My wife has V1 on her computer. I fixed up a photo and sent the file to her and she can't open it.
V1 version upgrades are a very different situation compared to V1 to V2. Anyone sharing files has to make sure they are all on the same version. With V1 and the generous upgrade model, that wasn't an issue because people could just tell the other person to upgrade to the latest version. Now that upgrade involves a payment.
-
12 minutes ago, Dangerous said:
I can't understand why people are so against it as an app.
You don't understand because everyone is different. For example, I have different drives and different folders on my system. I have all of my general utilities under D:\Tools and my development tools under D:\DevTools. I have general purpose software in C:\GeneralApps. This helps me with backups and management of the stuff that I work with. It's easy for me to configure the various applications when I need them to integrate with each other. It's the way that I am comfortable working and fits in my workflow and processes. Affinity is the first serious application that insists on being a Windows App. Can I work around it? Sure, and I have, but that's not the point. You aren't seeing something as a problem for you and are extrapolating that onto everyone else. Sure, it's possible to work around these issues but people shouldn't need to.
For me, I really appreciate what Serif has done by providing a very good non-subscription alternative to Adobe. I also appreciate their extremely fair upgrade policy. I have no problem paying for an upgrade. I am going to get 1 license of V2 to support them and hold off on the other 3 until I see what happens with the installations.
-
1 minute ago, rvst said:
Try the script in the post just above yours. It unsandboxes the app for me and makes it function like a normal Windows app
There are much better options than that. Changing permissions on folder is not a great solution and it could effect upgrades.
-
4 hours ago, Mark Ingram said:
This is a common statistic from Microsoft across all MSI installations. This is just one of many reasons why Microsoft want application developers to migrate to MSIX.
I understand your desire to move to MSIX for the reasons you listed but would you consider a MSI under "advanced downloads" for people who want more control over their installations.
-
1 hour ago, myclay said:
I just wanted to make sure that you (a fresh account with no name (yet) to it) are not trying to steal my and other peoples bank data.
Using an EXE file would be a big risk even if the account was an old one with plenty of posts and a name. There is no guarantee that the person who build the EXE file didn't have a virus on their computer. Software from Serif is different because they have a build and signing process and we are already trusting that process by running their software.
-
49 minutes ago, s.auler said:
The msix install files are digitally signed, so you can be sure that they come from serif and aren't manipulated by anyone. That's a major security advantage.
That is the case with the V1 installations too. No reputable software developer should be releasing unsigned installations.
-
4 hours ago, myclay said:
I narrowed the issue down a bit, I got it working via : renaming the msix to zip, unzipping it and using the path to that unzipped exe.
As long as the properly installed and original msix Version is open and running, The I/O will go now straight to the msix program.
3DCoat will now sent the files as it did before in V1 now with V2.Thanks. This got me working in a way that I can test properly. Note, you don't need to run the original one for this to work.
-
As per the title. Will V2 always try verify the license on startup or is that only at the time of activation.
-
For anyone battling to get this working. You can find the real location of the exe file by starting Affinity Photo and then going to task manager. If you right click on "Affinity Photo" in the task manage and choose "Properties", a dialog window will pop up that gives the exe file location next to the "Location:" text. This should work with the other applications too. You may need permission to access this folder but in my case, it worked without any permission changes.
-
4 hours ago, Deschdy said:
Look here:
That means: The Affinity developers can't solve the problem. No good news!
I really hope they reevaluate the choice of installer or at least provide an alternative installer for users. I would like to support Serif by buying the new version but this makes it really difficult to do.
-
Add me to the list of people not happy with this change. I have 4 licenses and was about to purchase the new version when I noticed this change. I have put my purchase on hold. I don't like the App Store system as I store my applications in different folders based on their purpose. Please give us a regular installation.
- PattiR, SpiffinJay and Corgi
-
3
Forum Security Alert: Important Information for All Forum Users
in Customer Service, Accounts and Purchasing
Posted
If you need information on the TOTP standard defined in RFC 6238, the algorithms are widely available and I can provide you with additional information. It's only about 20 lines of code IIRC.