Chris_06
-
Posts
72 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Thank you, but there is no need. I have figured it out. The workaround I posted works fine. The bug exists, nevertheless. -
Nope. That is exactly what I did. The problem I describe exists regardless.
-
Chris_06 reacted to a post in a topic:
Would like to be able to list all Notes similar to how Indexes are listed
-
Adding this here with the hope of getting the dev team's attention.
-
Numbering is buggy as well. Changing the Restart every option after the fact results in very odd numbering in which the main text and note body numbers are very out of sync. The problem appears to be that the underlying code does not reformat after the change. Changing the Number format option to any other format and then back corrects the number sync issue. Any option change made in the Document-wide settings should force a reformat of all note after every change.
-
This does make a mess of all individual note formatting as @philipt18 states. This should be a priority bug/enhancement IMHO.
-
Chris_06 reacted to a post in a topic:
Would like to be able to list all Notes similar to how Indexes are listed
-
Chris_06 reacted to a post in a topic:
Document-wide settings for Footnotes, and differences between footnotes on the same page
-
HCl reacted to a post in a topic:
[Work around found] Object unexpectedly changes position during data merge
-
That fixed it right up. Thanks @NathanC! Suggestion: When adding a new feature, have it default to the current expected behavior and announce it loudly. But then, maybe it was loudly announced, and I was away at the coffee pot at the time.
- 4 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- merge
- merge tool 2.6.0
- (and 3 more)
-
And this may yet be in reality a bug depending on if one needs a full spread data merge... It appears that the rotated text frame and rectangle objects are somehow being drawn relative to the spine in the spread. Although there is not property to control positioning like that that I can find. I have attached a copy of the merge template file to this post in the off chance that someone wants to have a look. 53-01_Back_Mailing_Info_bug.afpub
-
Fixed. Solution... In the template file: Document Setup > Model: Uncheck 'facing pages' Document Setup > Dimensions: Set 'Show dimensions of:' to Page (rather than Spread) Maybe that's current knowledge... somewhere.
-
AP 2.6.0 Merge template: Spread resulting from the merge:
-
Vertical Text Selection … ??
Chris_06 replied to Rigorious's topic in Feedback for the Affinity V2 Suite of Products
+1 -
JJM reacted to a post in a topic:
Make object styles editable (like text styles)
-
Chris_06 reacted to a post in a topic:
Problem with printing from Affinity Publisher
-
Find and replace on object styles should also be a basic feature.
-
Chris_06 reacted to a post in a topic:
Make object styles editable (like text styles)
-
This basic capability is still missing... 😑 And we are many iterations away from v 1.
-
That was pretty much my conclusion. It still seems a bit buggy, but this works fine. Thanks again for your help. Have a great new year!
-
@NotMyFault Thank you for your kind help with this. My apologies, I should have posted pics of the print copy to clarify where the lines are. Here are shots of print copies of the garland with and without associated layers. On my screen nearly infinite zoom still does not show them.
-
If this is what's happening, we should have an optional 'hard edge' available to apply.
