Jmoney1536

I would definitely pay for another license for a Linux version of both Photo and Designer. Since making the switch back, I've been using Gimp and Inkscape and they are good programs, but nowhere near as good as Affinity. And I believe there is a market for good apps that are not free on Linux; good example is Davinci Resolve. They make a Linux version of both their free and paid versions that are the same as the Windows versions....EXCEPT, on Linux, only the paid version has a totally open codec support library (meaning ability to import mp4 files, etc...). Is this a way to strong-arm the Linux community into paying $400 or whatever it is for a paid license of their software? Yep, but the point is it's there, as an option for those who want it, and Serif would be wise to follow suit, I think they would be pleasantly surprised the number of people who would be willing to pay for a license.