Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Fixx

Members
  • Posts

    3,329
  • Joined

Posts posted by Fixx

  1. As operations are non-destructive it is possible to apply posterisation layer and place a curves adjustment layer below it. That way you can adjust posterisation result "quite" easily.

    Having adjustment tools right in the posterisation layer would maybe be easier.

    Anyway, I dislike the way posterisation works on each colour channel separately, it would be better if it would be more like applying indexed colour mode – you would just define how many colours you want. 

  2. Crop tool works only the whole document as AP is meant to be a photo editor (as opposed to Designer and Publisher where each object can be cropped individually).

    You can though mask each image layer in composite quite easily by drawing a marquee around the image area you want to keep and clicking Mask Layer icon in the Layers palette.

  3. It is possible that Serif will skip version 1.9 and release v 2.0 soon. But I think it is more probable v 2.0 will not come out this year. This is pure guesswork though. Also, there really is no real indication of pricing. Current app stores though do not support special upgrade prices. So far Serif has sold new versions at reduced price for all for a limited time after release. This may continue or not. Also, it is possible that price will change – maybe version 2.0 will be so much better they charge double price. Anybody's guess.

  4. Find out what is the optimal dpi for your printing project. Your printer service can probably tell and for cloth printing it is probably significantly lower than for normal printed matter.

    You can upsample your images with Affinity Photo: Document > Resize document... Use Lanczos method for sharpest result.

    Note that you cannot really add sharpness to image with normal upsample methods. Be sure to apply unsharp mask filter to regain some sharpness. Also it may be meaningless to try upsample image more than 150-200 % – it will look soft anyway.

    Exotic upsamplers like Topaz Gigapixel have algorithms that invent sharpness to images and results may be much better at larger percentages.

  5. 5 hours ago, Noj said:

    Exposure 5. Selling points for me are

    X5 has got some very food reviews. Loos like it is a lot like LR but faster. No import, it just sees folders direct and provides previews as you go. LR catalog import is very basic and some suff like HRD and panos are still missing, NR is nothing to write home about. (This all is hearsay, I have not yet tested.) Wonder if it has content aware fill? Possibly even automatic when doing perspective correction?

  6. 20 hours ago, Old Bruce said:

    This has to do with the difference between pixels and vectors. In short you cannot select half of a pixel.

    When doing selections the key is antialiasing. Selection brush seems to create not very well antialiased selections.

    If you make selection from layers palette (cmd-click layer) it should be smooth, but it works only if you can select whole object content of the layer.

  7. 3 hours ago, GarryP said:

    Fixx: I didn’t say that PDFs could have any ‘special effects’. I just said that Publisher couldn’t add any. I hope this makes it clearer.

    I know, sorry. I just emphasized that using "special effects" is not common or easy task with any other tools either. Currently the fad is to make such effects to a web-based lookalike HTML5 publication, which is PDF no more. (And not really usable, IMHO.)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.