I remember the good feeling I used to have as a Serif user when I felt that the management were really keen to listen to and take heed of the suggestions and the feelings of its users.
Serif, now as serif affinity, gets larger and has made substantial inroads into Adobe profits from through superior and affordable know you are getting an yet software it also seems to the humble user that they are getting away from this friendly tradition.
There is a comparative newcomer on the software block that it would be profitable to take a profound look at, Scrivener.
It is taken up with alacrity and enthusiasm by the large number of people who would write fiction and other kinds of texts with the express end-purpose of publication. The slack for this has been taken up by many publish-on-demand firms who make large profits from this market.
With all its many uses and facility in organising text, Scrivener is not however quite as good at producing final PDFs for printing.
I'm sure there are many of these Scrivener users who would like to know the excellent means of making these PDFs offered by Affinity Publisher.
If you want to see the support for this program, all you have to do is to google "Scrivener" and "videos".
Lo and behold, a multitude of amateur and professional tuitional videos will appear by the many enthusiastic about this program. Most of them seem to be Apple users as well as long-term Scrivener enthusiasts. To me they seem to offer all the makings of potential customers for Serif.
They also tend to A New Marketingprovide extra evidence that the many exPageplus users who specialise in publications which are heavy in textual content should perhaps be better catered for in their requirements for editors and footnotes.
Just a thought that I felt could be of interest to those that make decisions.
John