ljredux
-
Posts
13 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by ljredux
-
-
I wondered how long I would be able to keep this email account spam free when I created it over five years ago. I'm surprised it lasted this long given the sheer number of contacts, so well done, I guess. When I check https://haveibeenpwned.com/ in a few weeks, I expect Affinity to be the first name to appear on the list of shame.
-
I guess I'll check-in every couple of weeks to see if there's any news. I'm not buying V1 now if V2 is imminent and I have to buy it all over again to stay current.
Thanks for the replies. 🙂
-
One year after trialling Photo and Designer and deciding I wasn't quite ready to migrate from Photoshop and Illustrator I finally have time to make an effort to migrate to the Serif products. The possibility of a looming 2.0 release is now stopping me though. Gotta wonder how many others are hesitating over those Buy buttons.
-
Problem is, there are so many file formats and most of them seem to be problematic. I'm trialling AP and spent all my free time over two days trying to get better results with resizing (resampling) and exporting to various formats, but Photoshop simply does it better (whatever the format) with the exact same files. I have more control over the exporting process too. I hate Gimp but even that does better with resampling and exporting. Maybe I'm expecting too much from software at this price point..., I don't know.
-
Windows natively supports mice with up to five buttons: left, middle (the mouse wheel button), and right, plus two additional buttons called XBUTTON1 and XBUTTON2. The Windows Messages that need to be handled are listed here. Bloated mouse utility software (which add latency) shouldn't be required to support those two extra buttons.
I would love to be able to shift those horrible so-called 'shortcuts' which require a simultaneous left click + right click over to the additional buttons. Getting the timing right and avoiding context menu popups is a pain.
-
I just want to check that this will continue a trial started yesterday with version 1.9.2. I'm sure it won't be revoked, but I'd like to make sure nonetheless.
-
17 minutes ago, Pšenda said:
10 days is the standard trial period. Only during the coronavirus crisis did Serif provide an extension to 90 days (along with a 50% discount).
Yeah, I figured it out after I posted. No worries anyway. When I have more free time, ten days will be enough.
-
Uh, it looks like I misread something somewhere and was being premature anyway. I didn't realise the trial was only ten days so I'll wait until I have a reduced workload later this year before evaluating and working out whether it's a good Photoshop + Illustrator replacement for me. Thanks again for all the info.
-
3 hours ago, carl123 said:
You don't have to pay. The version you buy will continue to work until the day you die or Microsoft releases Windows 12 (whichever comes first!)
I was referring to the next major update. Ie 1.x > 2.0. I feel compelled to stay current, so it would grate if 2.0 was released within 1-2 months of purchasing the Affinity 1.x suite. MEB answered my question anyway, but I appreciate you trying to help. I've already decided to start trialling the products immediately. 🙂
-
Thanks MEB. I appreciate the quick reply. 👍
-
On 3/19/2021 at 4:50 PM, MEB said:
It's not known yet, sorry. The next major update is still a few good months away.
Months not years (from March 2021)?
This uncertainty is putting me off trialling the software. Don't wanna discover after three months that the three programs I'm interested in meet my needs... only for 2.0 to be within 1-2 months away. It would suck to have to pay an upgrade fee for three programs after such a short amount of time.
Forum Security Alert: Important Information for All Forum Users
in Customer Service, Accounts and Purchasing
Posted
All of those data breaches that happen every day are still completely unacceptable and 100% the fault of the company in charge of the data. Yes, it would be nice if all end users understood best practices, but the fact of the matter is, many will always be less tech savvy than others and that's partly why regulations are so important. Data operators have a duty of care. Unfortunately, time and again, we find that many weren't taking that duty seriously enough. Rarely do we get an unfiltered, completely truthful explanation for data breaches because it's in the data operator's interests to present a perspective that shows them in the best possible light. Only when a regulator investigates (because a breach was particularly damaging) do we usually get the truth, and it's almost always more disturbing than the original explanation.