Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Jocarnail

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jocarnail

  1. +1 for GREP styles. I have recently moved completely away from Adobe's suit and this is among the tools I am missing the most.
  2. This is not what Nested styles are. They are not about style hierarchy, but about automatic formatting. They are basically a form of GREP style. The most similar thing in Affinity is Initial words, that however do not have the same amount of control that is paramount to nested styles. For example you can only apply one character style. I don't think I can explain it better than with a link. Here is a site explaining what they do. And here on adobe site And here is a video on the argument
  3. I have never used Scribus, but the Story editor should be similar to what I intended. The last part of your first paragraph also would be interesting to have. I am not aware of Affinity having nested styles, could you provide a link to them? I think you are conceptualizing nested styles as a style based on another style, but that is not what they are in InDesign. They are a paragraph style that apply different character style to sections of text based on some elements found in the text. For example a Bold style from start to the first ":", then normal test, and then another character style lets say after a tab. They are really useful for texts that have a complex-yet-regular formatting. Here is another more in-depth discussion on nested styles specifically. As for object styles: having to manually copy the style of an object every time I need to change the padding for text wrapping doesn't make the work easier. I may have to repeat this operations hundred of times while working, sometimes just to discover that the adjustment wasn't right.
  4. Hey everybody, As an hobby I write and publish material for TTRPGs, working mostly on my own. I usually prepare my publications using the Adobe suit, or sometimes Latex — which I use a lot, but mostly for other stuff — but some time ago I decided to give Affinity a chance, and bought Photo, Designer and Publisher. The suit would be perfect for my workflow: I do digital paintings and vector graphics and I like to be able to use them easily in my text editor of choice. What I have seen since of the softwares is really great. I especially love the consistency and integration between the three softwares. I would like to move my workflow from the Adobe suit to the Affinity one. However, there are some features that I use a lot in InDesign that aren't implemented in Publisher and that I wasn't able to replace with consistent and comfortable features of Publisher. I think that as a whole the three softwares still cannot replace my workflow — jet — even if they are amazing. I would like to suggest here some of the features that I would like to see implemented, that I believe would be a great improvement — at least for how I work. Copywriting persona: The ability to work on text passages in isolation is of the utmost importance in my opinion. If I am working on a complex layout I need to be able to work on the text alone, and only on it. It would also be useful to be able to control the single passages of text, like if they were layers; import and export them, work on the single sections and move them around. This, imho, would improve significantly the ease of use of the software. Link text and md files: As an addition to the previous point. I often write my texts outside the program I use to layout, and I would love to be able to import the text as a resource, keep working on it, and have the changes done in Publisher also in the original file. I work a lot using markdown, which I usually then have to convert to paragraph styles semi-manually, and support for it would be a great feature. "Nested Styles" and GREP styles: Here I am using the Adobe names for it, but I use this feature all the time. I use them to create dynamic paragraph styles — that, I will admit , are more relevant in my field of publishing. I especially use them to give specific character styles to some parts of text, either using specific separators/end characters, or searching for specific bits/tags. It is very handy to be able to control and change them and apply them to all the text automatically. "Object Styles": I think this is another feature I miss a lot in Publisher. The ability to assign settings to an object, be it a text frame, picture, table etc. and update them for all assigned objects. I use it a lot for pictures wrapped with text, because I am not going to know right away how much space in between I want. I may change my mind while working and having to go back to every single picture is a nightmare. Sure, Styles in Affinity sort-of do the trick, but they are not linked to the objects and it is not possible to modify them directly. I think it would be great to be able to do so. Having a collection of all setting related to an object. It would also be great to be able to treat them as text styles, and have base styles, and styles based on that. This are my thoughts right now on the suite. I still think I am going to try and work more with Affinity, because there are many many things to love. I have worked a bit with Designer, and found it very good. I like Photo for digital painting but I wouldn't mind paying extra for a dedicated "Affinity Painter" if it were to push out better features than PS for digital drawing. I decided to buy the softwares even if I may not use them as my main tools because I saw potential in them, and wanted to support this developing company. I can't wait to see were the next updates will lead them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.