Vex
-
Posts
85 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Vex
-
-
Since v1 and v2 are not intercompatible in any way, why not use a different file extension, or offer the ability to save in the older version of the file format?
I use Mac and PC, but I do not use the latest MacOS. I need 32-bit support, so I'm using Mojave forever, and v2 won't let me save files that I can open on my Macs in v1.
I definitely understand why there are incompatibilities due to new features and the like, but Adobe has an advantage here - every Adobe app I use allows me to save files in older versions of Adobe's file formats.
-
In any event, the panels take up way too much space on a low-resolution display. This is one feature Adobe has and Affinity needs.
-
Just here to add my feedback on this (old) suggestion.
I use Affinity's Mac products on some older hardware with super low-res displays - my 13" MBP is only 1280x800; my 11" MBA is only 1366x768.
It makes for a cramped UI - vertical collapsing would be super useful.
-
Thank you! I will definitely play around with this the next time I make a cutting project.
-
Is there a way to specify the output dimensions when exporting to SVG? I make a lot of SVGs for cutting and engraving, and I've had a terrible time getting my finished project from Designer to other software - the dimensions are always off, and I usually end up having to import the SVG into Illustrator to set the dimensions by inches (or mm) so I can cut/engrave it properly.
-
Count me as a user who would love EPUB export. I'm working on digitizing a rather large book, and for the time being, InDesign is still the best option for him, because it allows managing both the print and digital versions of the book from one application. He's not a techie, he's an author and an artist, and when you've got non-tech people using software, the fewer applications they have to learn, the better.
Amazon just announced they're ending support for MOBI and AZW, and they're finally moving to EPUB. I think supporting this format is more relevant now than ever before because of Amazon's switch.
As far as the format: I'm unconvinced it would necessarily be difficult to implement the HTML and CSS serializers to generate an EPUB file. Affinity Publisher documents are highly structured, if you create them properly. That makes it pretty trivial to convert to HTML/CSS - every entity on every page already contains all the information you need to include it in the final EPUB. Designer already supports continuous-flow text, which is what an EPUB requires, since ebook readers have no concept of physical pages (unless you force it, which isn't a good experience for the reader), and paragraph and text styles can readily be converted to CSS styles.
If Affinity Designer supported EPUB export, it could be the software print authors turn to for their layout and digitizing needs. It's certainly a lot cheaper than any of Adobe's pricing options.
- Ramon56 and pixelstuff
-
2
-
-
-
I haven't run it yet, but when I preview it, it's not rotated properly.
Since posting this I've been working on a version with the page itself rotated, and a couple cards which were scanned differently from most are rendering improperly, due to the rotation issue:
I did finally run this to see what it gave me, and the images are still wrong. In the below I've rotated the page view 90deg to make it easier to work with the result.
-
I have a directory of scanned cards:
I have a layout in APub that's just an image frame on a page with the margins I need, the end goal being to embed an image on each page.
The cards were scanned sideways, and rotated in Windows Explorer, which I belief changes the image's metadata rather than actually opening, rotating, and saving the bitmap itself. It appears APub is ignoring this:
Is there a way to set the image rotation, so when I run the data merge on all 64 images, it will be properly rotated? Or do I need to use some other means to rotate the images (something I can do if necessary) first?
Also creating this as a bug because I believe APub should respect the rotation data. APhoto opens the images with the proper rotation without issue.
-
On 6/10/2021 at 5:11 AM, stokerg said:
Yup its a bug and i've just logged it with the Dev team to fix.
I've also moved this over to the bugs section of the Forums, so it's easier for the QA team to track
Any update on this?
-
Thanks for the tips. I haven't had a chance to do all the clean driver remove/install stuff, but I disabled hardware acceleration to see what might change, and I definitely think you're on the right track - perf is noticeably better without HW acceleration enabled. That's a pretty good sign it's a driver issue.
So I will get to the GPU stuff as soon as I have the time!!
-
I'm seeing serious perf issues when working with complex files (lots of pages, layers, etc.)
For instance, I'm making adjustments to this vector image - a series of 26 straight paths from a center point, with four circle paths. There's also a number of hidden layers in this particular project.
When I'm actively working in Publisher and Designer on this project, perf is just terrible:
This machine should be able to handle things just fine - I have a 4GHz i7 6700K, 48GB RAM, and a GTX 1080 with 8GB VRAM. This machine generally doesn't have performance problems this bad in other demanding applications (like Adobe's stuff, Office, Visual Studio, etc.) I have hardware acceleration enabled.
It's not causing perf problems to the point that the software is unusable, but it does mean there's a noticeable lag between clicks and responses to clicks.
I seem to have far fewer problems with the same version (1.9.2.1035) running on my laptop, which is an AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U with 32GB RAM and AMD Radeon GPU, so it might be something going on with my local machine, but I'm unsure what to look at first.
-
3 hours ago, MikeW said:
Here ya go.
Works perfectly. THANK YOU!
-
I can't seem to make simulated caps work with this font. 😕 I've attached the font (Rye Regular).
The small caps is working for the other font I'm using in this file, and the available glyphs appear to be identical or nearly so.
-
Does APub support emulating small cap(ital)s for fonts that don't have specific small cap glyphs?
I'm using a free font that only has a basic Latin alphanumeric character set.
-
Wonderful! Looking forward to the patch. I'll delay finding a different solution for my project and hopefully will be able to just use the fix.
-
Count me in for wanting a crop-to-selection functionality. This is a key feature of Photoshop that's still missing. I was happy to see a similarly key feature of Illustrator make it into Designer, so that at least makes me optimistic that the mods/admins aren't ignoring us entirely.
I've been getting into the habit of using Affinity over Adobe whenever I start something new, and this is one where it's just easier for me to go back to Photoshop to accomplish this task, rather than trying to find a convoluted route in Photo.
- Jaguda and pixelstuff
-
2
-
Ruh-roh - that makes sense, but puts me in a pickle. The files I'm working with were created by someone else, so I'm trying to avoid adding any steps to this whole project that involve me having to tediously edit the formatting of every italicized word/phrase in the text.
Is this still a bug, then, or a feature request? It'd be sweet if Affinity's products could properly interpret faux formatting applied to text layers (if that's even possible; I know nothing about the PSD format).
In the meantime...any thoughts on how I might mitigate this without manually editing ~700 pages?
(Oh P.S. Pink Floyd was right about time.)
-
Sure, I've attached a PSD and AFPUB with an example. Interestingly, I also just discovered that if I go to edit the PSD within APub, the italicized text becomes normal. If I open the PSD in APhoto, there is no italicized text.
Yes, this is a bug. Sorry for posting in the wrong location!
-
My source file is a PSD with text layers. I'm using Affinity Publisher to import these PSDs into a document, which I'm then exporting to PDF.
This has been working out very well for the most part, but I've discovered that some (not all) inline formatting isn't being preserved during the export to PDF. Italic text is a particular sticking point, as seen in the example below. PDF on the left, APub on the right.
-
Just now, LondonSquirrel said:
It hasn't. I've been hearing and reading the same arguments for 20 years. The same arguments are regurgitated with a different veneer.
Yes, it has. You're basing your opinion based on past arguments you've had with people in the past two decades. That doesn't mean anything to the conversation we're having right now.
The work Valve has put into compatibility has made tremendous inroads for cross-platform Win32 application support. In case you're unfamiliar with this, that means real, paid, genuine, educated, skilled software engineers work on Linux compatibility full time, and that's a pretty recent development - even since that one Affinity employee made that comment in 2016.
Your entire premise is based on obsolete information and a really obvious prejudice against Linux users, for whatever stupid reason.
I will grant you that most OSS devs are hella obnoxious, but your characterization of the regular people who use Linux is beyond ridiculous.
-
2 minutes ago, D’T4ils said:
Are you guys that naive that you keep playing this toxic person's game? JEEZ!
I'm procrastinating on the project that got me into using Affinity's products in the first place.
-
Just now, LondonSquirrel said:
No, I'm not a mod. And neither are you. But I am at least quoting Affinity whereas you are not.
And as I have pointed out multiple times, that was nearly six years ago. A lot has changed in the Linux world since then - things you know nothing about, and therefore have no credible opinion to offer.
So you can keep repeating something an Affinty employee said six years ago like a YakBak, or we can actually talk about what potential there is, given the numerous developments since that single employee made that single statement.
Critical Error: Edit Affinity Photo 1 file with Photo 2 -> Save -> Not opening in 1
in Affinity on Desktop Questions (macOS and Windows)
Posted
It's better than nothing, but it's making it unnecessarily difficult to work on projects between platforms.,,