Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

iconoclast

Members
  • Posts

    1,670
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by iconoclast

  1. Habe es überprüft. "Gaußsche Unschärfe" gibt es ja mindestens drei Mal in Affinity Photo: destruktiv im "Filter"-Menü, unter "Unschärfe", und non-destruktiv als Live-Filter und in den Effekten. Bei mir funktionieren alle drei wie sie sollen, soweit ich feststellen kann. Kann es vielleicht sein, dass in diesem Fall der Gaußsche nicht auf eine Bildebene, sondern auf eine Anpassungsebene angewendet wurde? Dann würde nämlich natürlich nichts passieren.

  2. On 2/24/2021 at 7:23 PM, LibreTraining said:

    QuarkXPress has a similar feature. Makes it real easy to just drop a copy of the fonts in the same folder as the document.

    Even LibreOffice has a fonts folder (undocumented) which makes un-installed fonts available to use in documents.
    I test there first to avoid any font cache or other font install issues.
    Makes it very easy to test without any font problems.

    That's interesting. But where can I find this folder? Couldn't find it.  Does it also exist on Windows?

  3. What seems a little bit odd to me is that the preview of the layer in the layers panel is black. The image I have on my screen, that has a transparent background and a white layer with black lines on it, is white in the preview, with the checkerboard looking through the transparent areas, and verry thin lines. Could it possibly somehow have to do with the channels? Maybe you find some clues for the problem in the history/protocol (don't know how it's called in english).

  4. Hi lavender!

    Affinity programs don't content fonts, as far as I see. So the fonts that appear in your Affinity programs must already have been on your computer. If they are free for commercial use depends on their individual licence restrictions. It's the same with additional stuff for the Affinity programs, but the ones you can buy from the Affinity Store and the free ones you get with updates are normally free even for commercial use. The artworks you create with Affinity software will be free for your commercial use anyway, except you made it with the demo-version.

  5. This could possibly be caused by the certain brush you are using. Brushes are based on images. If the brushstroke on that image is shorter than the width of the image, it will in some cases not create closed contours. Doubleclick on the brush in the "Brushes" panel. At the bottom of the panel that appears then, there is a window where you can see the image. There are two vertical red lines. Drag them a little, so that they cut the brush.

  6. As I saw on your screenshot, you reduced the horizontal scaling of the text to 25%, possibly to get a condensed style. That could be the reason for that strange result. You shouldn't do that, because you will only get a false style by this way with destroyed proportions of the letters. It is a typographic no go.

    Hope I'm understandable. My english is not verry good.

  7. If you draw the wench, and then the hammer overlapping it, make a duplicate of the hammer. Then subtract one of the hammers from the wench, so that it will get a gap where the hammer is, while one of the two hammers disappears (- because it is subtracted). But the other one is still there. And whatever transparency you may choose, there will no longer be the lines of the wench looking through. And if you group the hammer with the wench, they can get the same transparency i n the same step.

    Subtract.JPG

  8. If you export your Perlin-Noise-Image as f.e. PNG, load it as Bump-Map into the Lighting-Filter, that you apply to the same image, and then play a little with the Texture-Ruler, it will look like this. The 3d-Extrusion-Filter in G'MIC wasn't a good tip (Sorry!), but there is also an Emboss-Filter in G'MIC (section "Details") that looks somehow similar to this. Is this what you are looking for?

    PerlinNoise-bump-mapped.png.d19bbd30ec3c8e5cbe789015b392b3be.png

  9. 23 minutes ago, Orbek said:

    Rasterization is not helping, but I noticed something strange. When I open, for example, a texture - the plugin works. When I create an empty document and throw in the same texture - the plugin doesn't work.

     

    Are you sure that it doesn't have to do with rasterization? If you open an image, it's already rasterized (see screenshot1). The layer name contains (Pixel) then. If you drag an image into a document, the layer name says that it is an (Image) (see screenshot2). So it has to be rasterized first, before you can start G'MIC.

    As I said, I can't tell you more detailed things, because G'MIC doesn't work in my Affinity Photo anyway. Here is a LINK to the thread about my problem. Don't know if it will help you.

    screenshot1.JPG

    screenshot2.JPG

  10. 7 minutes ago, Orbek said:

    The effect is the same for both RGB / 8 and CMYK.
    I have the entire Affinity package from the manufacturer (https://affinity.serif.com/).

    Is your image rasterized? If it is only an "Image" ((you can see that in  the layers name), G'MIC will not work. In that case you must rightclick on the layer and click "Rasterize" first, before you start G'MIC.

  11. Looks good in the video. But it is not easy to say if it will also work so nice in practicing. And as far as I could see, it's only drawing with two vanishing points, not with three as in reality.

    The painting software Rebelle also has an interesting solution for perspective drawing. Didn't test it, but it looks verry good in the demo-video. And it uses three vanishing points, as far as I remember.

    I think a usable solution for the meantime could be to have guidelines that are rotatable freely, like f.e. in Inkscape. With that and a little knowledge about perspective, you should be able to create perspectivly realistic scenes.

  12. 1 minute ago, alexanderklar said:

    Yes, I think so, too. Publisher should include all types of quotation marks for optical alignment by default. But it's great that you can customize the alignment for each character. For example using DIN with it's straight "Aufstrich" in C and G for example I de-activated the alignment. Very nice we can do it this way. 🙏

    That's absolutely cool. No doubt about it. And I think that it's obvious, that even germans and french would want to align their quotation marks by default. But I think it should also be possible to do your own general adjustments, not only for one document, but even for all documents, if you want.  And you should be able to choose then which way you would like for your actual document. That would be extremely cool.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.