Seweryn

Hi, +1 for Markdown. Especially in context of preparing notes in Obsidian and then extracting them to Affinity Publisher. Would be good to avoid quite error prone "copy-paste" process. Regards, Seweryn.

Hi, Thanks for the feedback. I am happy to help you. Best regards, Seweryn.

Hi, Photos are uploaded: https://www.dropbox.com/request/Engu0X17MkJkULxdHfiY I am using Affinity Photo 1.10.4.1198 on Windows. The problem is that somehow photos in NEF format are more RED, or they have strange RED artifacts. Especially, in my case, I did them in 1600 ISO, so it might be also bug reported in (*). You will see screenshots from: Fast Stone Viewer (free tool), Light Room and Affinity Photo. Displaying is getting worse in the same direction as listed here. I have not very strong theory, that in fact green color is shifted to the left, at least I have such a feeling by looking at histograms, but this is not scientifically confirmed. So the dominance of the "red" is only an optical effect. And those errors are nor possible to repair by simple levels, gamma changes or white balance changes. As well as decreasing of the clarity does not help at all as it is not really noise, but shifted to red areas. If you need more examples, I have a couple of more shots like that. Thanks in advance and regards, Seweryn. (*)

Hi, Thanks for the response. I will describe all in the ticket which might be also related. Best regards, Seweryn.

Hi, Thanks for the proposal. I found some older ticket where my problem is also mentioned and still not solved. I will use your link and place photos there. It might be like this: Or this: Best regards, Seweryn.

Hi, Due to GDPR I can not publish photo on the forum. How can I report a bug related to such a photo? Do you have any storage with NDA, that data will not be shared? Best regards, Seweryn.

The same problem I observe on Windows :-(.

Hi, Is this somehow solved? I have the same problems. BR, Seweryn.

Hi, Is this problem solved? I have the same effect. BR, Seweryn.

Hi, I am working on some leaflet, where separate chapters/sections comes from different authors (text files). What are best practices to work in such a case? As I have to glue the document, whenever I got new text from any author I have to recreate his or hers chapter from scratch (text flows, fonts styles, ...). Are there any options, not to do this all over and over again? Remark: The main reason for my question is that for images, the workflow is pretty clear in that case. One shall use linked images and operate on resource manager. Best regards, Seweryn.

Hi, Thanks for helping me. I am attaching the complete project. It is my "private" photo, so feel free to experiment, as I was starting to do :-). BR, Seweryn. _DSC3408.zip

Dears, How to use layer masking in Affinity Photo 1.10.1 (AP)? For me, this tutorial (https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/tutorials/photo/desktop/video/332168517/) does not work at all. At the very beginning, AP v. 1.10.1 behaves differently. Mask in the icon in layers panel appears not in the place, where it is painted. Mask does not create any transparency between layers. Are there any significant changes around this topic between AP version 1.9 and 1.10? Best regards, Seweryn.

Hi, On Windows I am using FastStone: https://www.faststone.org/FSViewerDetail.htm I am not what "selling point" would be to have it in Affinity Studio. It shall be a kind of separate tool, which serves for all Studio parts. Regards, Seweryn.

Hi, Simply: "Liquify for designer" :-). I think this would be great to have. Regards, Seweryn.

Hi, I have a simple question. Is any of the tracers good enough for complex shapes? What would be your rating? I have not used all of them, but I tried few free and commercial ones and at the end I was never happy with the results, because: worked only for demos or simple cases*, which I was able to vectorize myself by hand; having this traced shape, I never can efficiently work with it except very trivial resizing or so. So finally I took glass of water and patiently draw what shall I draw ignoring this fancy feature. What was anyhow good for design, as I might rethink the symbol, logo or whatever. *) simple shapes, only few colors. Best regards, Seweryn.