Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

tnargs

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tnargs

  1. 11 hours ago, George H said:

    For Mac users...

    After a lot of searching, and many trial and errors, I found "Raw Power" to be an excellent Adobe Bridge alternative that I am able to tie into Affinity. It is $29 at the MAC app store. I would prefer free but the cost is reasonable when you consider that once you buy it you can install it on all of your Macs. There is also a cheaper IOS version. It is fast, able to view large numbers of raw files, ties into Apple Photos if you are into that, or you can simply point it to a folder.

    I found the iOS version too limiting. And you can’t just work on files in a folder: you have to import full copies of the photos into either a RawPower library or Apple Photos library. That really annoyed me, along with not being able to have the library anywhere other than the home drive of the iOS device, which inevitably means the home drive will fill up before long for the keen photographer.

    The MacOS version is probably far more flexible.

    Cheers

  2. Hi, my MacBook died and I bought a PC (tough times...)

    I can no longer use my Affinity Photo licence on a Mac. Quite happy if it gets cancelled TBH.

    So I need to transfer it to my PC.

    Been having no problems making the transfer from my purchased Mac OS licences to PC for numerous commercial products: FastRawViewer, RawDigger, VueScan, JRiver Media Center, for example.

    But how do I do it for AP?

     

    thanks

  3. 19 hours ago, Patrick Connor said:

    To all participants in this thread

    This to and fro stops now.

    You come here to express your own opinions to Serif, about Serif (software). Criticizing other people's opinions will not change Serif's view and may get you banned.

    As deeply as I sympathize with this (firm) request, and welcome it, I cannot help but think that it would never have happened if only Serif were a little more forthcoming.

    At the start of this thread, Serif staff said that the DAM is "planned". A mealy word that invites misunderstanding. An invitation that was accepted.

    20 months later Serif staff said, again in this thread, that the DAM is on a long list of to-do's and in front of it lie "Affinity Designer for iPad, Affinity Publisher and next betas/updates to Affinity Designer and Photo for desktop (1.7)." This looked like a substantial setback for eager followers.

    Another 15 months have passed, and it looks to me like all those prior projects are done. So, what are we to think? Does that mean it is at the top of the to-do list? Or have another four major projects arisen and pushed it back again?

    How about giving us a crumb, please? Preferably something not agonizingly vague. I respect your need not to over-commit. But it has been a long wait, with mixed signals. Don't we deserve some news? Something that is fair to both Serif and us?

    regards

  4. really can't agree with this, "AP in this thread led customers to believe that a DAMwas in the cards in near future". People might have misled themselves, but all I ever saw from Serif/AP years ago about DAM in Affinity Photo, was a statement that it was on a list of things that they might get around to looking at one day, but it was definitely not on their priority/action list, and don't expect anything any time soon.

    As far as I can tell, it has never gotten onto their priority/action list, and they have never said that it has.

    cheers

  5. Seeing some serious aliasing in Sigma x3f files from the sdQ when processed in beta 11.  On a positive note, happy not to see those pesky pdaf black dots.

     

    Yes this is the same issue I raised here, and opened a thread for, which contains links to online examples, but so far not even an acknowledgement. Complete silence. It has been a couple of weeks now.

     

    Does this mean they don't see the issue? I'm imagining it? Or I am a nobody and don't count? Who knows?

  6. I'm posting as a beginner. I would like to be able to synthesise the effect of a wide-aperture lens.

     

    I assume it involves accurately selecting the area that I want to remain sharp, then working on the unselected area.

     

    I would like to be able to transition the effect, either sharply (near subject against a distant background), or smoothly (subject against a receding background).

     

    thank you

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.