Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

jmac

Members
  • Posts

    246
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jmac

  1. Exporting a PDF means that many things will be missing in Illustrator, for example ordered and named layers. Much work gets lost. The agency will not be lucky. ((((If you just have to import a few curves this is not a big problem.))))

     

    The issue of compatibility and reasonable work arounds between Affinity and the current industry standards is a concern to me BUT, I get PDF files from clients all the time that I open in Illustrator. No the layers aren't named and sometimes the font formatting gets chopped up. Sometimes drop shadows get rasterized but I have never had a situation where "Much work gets lost". I may have to spend a little time putting things back together but the file is editable and the information is there to work with. Missing fonts...that is a whole other issue.

  2. I find it ironic to hear Windows users feeling the same frustration Mac users have known for years...discovering a great piece of software only to find it is Windows only. I would be surprised if Serif did not release a Windows version simply because of the potential profit. But I do hope it is after Photo, Designer and Publisher have been matured and polished for awhile.

  3. Mike,

     

    I have Affinity Photo 1.3.5. I opened an image and called Topaz B&W Effects. Other than requiring me to enter my serial number again it worked. After applying an adjustment I returned to AP and called Topaz Simplify. It also wanted the serial number again but it also worked, I applied an effect and returned to AP without problem. It seems that those that were working are still working. Same for those that weren't working.

  4. Matt,

     

    It sounds like you were using photoshop to do some things a design software like Affinity Designer was made to do. But you also need the photo editing capabilities photoshop and Affinity Photo are best at. If buying both Designer and Photo is an option for you, as MEB and LilleG said, that would be your best bet. If you have to choose just one, Photo might feel more like what you have been using though it does do some things a little differently than photoshop. Something to keep in mind though, based on the type of work you described, is that Designer will give you much greater flexibility and artistic choices when it comes to text for things like album art and posters. You cannot put text on a curved path in Photo like you can in Designer for example. Also in Designer you can create work using vectors which can be scaled to any size without worrying about resolution, which could be very useful for banners.

  5. ivykok, If you look at your first attachment showing the brush you made you will see a small menu button to the right of the "Basic" brush palette. Click that to bring up the brush editing panel. There are quite a few adjustments you can make there to get your brush to behave the way you want. It looks like A_B_C has his brush spacing and other adjustments set up differently than yours.

  6. This is omitted by design. Photo and Designer are different apps, and each has features that the other doesn't have. However, they can both open each other's files, so you can sometimes create a feature in one app and then edit it in the other. That's what's happening here. It's not an oversight or something we're planning to change.

     

     

    I have to say this mind set seems oddly rigid and unsupported by the nature of the 2 applications. While they each do have "features that the other doesn't have" they clearly share many, many others, some of which you would not expect. Like being able to "create a feature in one app and then edit it in the other." This does not set them apart from each other. It sets them apart from Adobe. This feature compatibility between the two apps and the pixel persona in Designer specifically, is much more advantageous to designers who often work with photos and vectors than it is to photographers who I image rarely need the design capabilities of a vector app. There is clearly a need, even if only now and then, by photographers, and I would imagine digital painters as well, to make attractive text within their images. This is a feature that makes sense to include in Affinity Photo. If you not going to allow text on a path because "Photo and Designer are different apps" then why include text in Photo at all? I really don't understand the logic here and forcing photographers to buy (even at a very reasonable cost) an additional application to access this one feature doesn't seem reasonable.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.